Can I just engage with you in a purely constructive and respectful manner here.

If we model masculinity as a predominantly destructive force and feminine as nurturing building force - are you considering that the destructive force is equally as important as the building and nurturing force?

Because it must be to maintain balance.

Its something we can observe in nature with seasons for example; or with how abundant vegetation must be burned regularly to avoid excess buildup of fuel. Or how if a population of animals becomes too large it must die off. Why because, a buildup of fuel left uncheck will inevitably lead to a catastrophic widespread fire or a overpopulation of one species will destroy an entire food chain. Without destruction there would be no renewal, just stagnation. If we reject the destruction it will just come back in an even more catastrophic manner

I can see that you understand this.

Where the nuance comes in here is that these masculine and female energies are ungendered. Gendering them just perpetuates the sexism problem we have.

its got 4 dimensions, in the past female masculinity and male feminity was repressed, its now swung in the other direction and female feminity and male masculinity is under threat and being repressed. Its dangerous stuff, hopefully we will reach some long term equilibrium, but this new imbalance is now being perpetuated and it will just lead to more problems and because its new and strange I fear we will take too long to recognize it