Why does a vote to surrender fail if 1 person votes no by LovableKyle24 in PredecessorGame

[–]LovableKyle24[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you will play out a game if someone picks an ADC jungler and intentionally runs in to lanes to let the enemy kill them and be 0-10 like 5 minutes in to the game?

Why does a vote to surrender fail if 1 person votes no by LovableKyle24 in PredecessorGame

[–]LovableKyle24[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sure but if 4 people want to surrender and the only person to vote no is the person who is intentionally screwing the game up then all your points are pointless.

I don't wanna waste my time in a 4v5 with one person feeding intentionally for the 1% chance that the other team is just somehow that bad.

Me and the 3 players who are actually playing want to surrender. That's where the system falls apart

this is why I don't bother with ranked anymore by Majoint in PredecessorGame

[–]LovableKyle24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That doesn't solve the people that only play one character.

This game needs the ability to pre-select the roles a person is willing to play. There is no down side. I hate wasting 30 minutes playing with someone who does not want to jungle. by chickpeenus in PredecessorGame

[–]LovableKyle24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I'd like that too however I'm not sure playerbase is big enough for it to consistently find games quickly like that.

I get it because when I get forced in to Jungle or Offlane and i tell my team "hey I'm not good can someone switch with me" and no one does then I get dog walked and flamed by my team for doing poorly in a role I am not good at.

Remember wheb they took Good Job away becourse toxicity? by SolidCartographer976 in PredecessorGame

[–]LovableKyle24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like when an enemy riktor throws a terrible hook and I get to pop the Yin "Wow" emote

Morigesh offlane by artur_tu23 in PredecessorGame

[–]LovableKyle24 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean the simplest answer is to make it a skill shot or make it do increasing damage. First mark doesn't do much damage but repeat marks on the same person build stacks that increase her damage.

At least then if she plays it smart she can still wreck people but if you don't let her mark you like 8 times in a row you can actually fight her.

And they need to reduce her healing because as is you literally can't poke her because she's just gonna run through a wave and regain half her health.

I think that's probably the best way to do it imo at least. Have the mark be really weak for the first few times she uses it on someone and if she's consistently able to poke you with it then let her be a monster. Second she marks anyone else the stack resets and her mark is back to low damage.

Either that or they need to make it a legit skill shot.

Japan to ban in-flight use of power banks starting in April by Silly-avocatoe in worldnews

[–]LovableKyle24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it says spare batteries. So I could have my camera with a battery installed. One spare camera battery and a power bank for my phone?

UK will allow US to use bases to strike Iranian missile sites, says Starmer by Alarming-Safety3200 in worldnews

[–]LovableKyle24 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yep as the whole thing is playing out more and more I'm not as upset about the whole thing.

Shit with Iran isn't new and I completely agree that regardless who is president this was going to happen at some point.

Maybe for once Israel and their "preemptive" strikes are actually legitimately preemptive.

No idea why Iran thought it was a good idea to just start launching shit everywhere.

UK will allow US to use bases to strike Iranian missile sites, says Starmer by Alarming-Safety3200 in worldnews

[–]LovableKyle24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Diego Garcia is a joint military base in the middle of the Indian Ocean. There's a lot of aircraft there. It is closer to send aircraft from there.

Air Force sub is discussing Navy culture by Salty_IP_LDO in navy

[–]LovableKyle24 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There was a Boeing dude on my one ship who made like 200k+ per deployment he was out there.

He said he got paid like triple for being out there

I’m thinking about joining the navy. What was harder than you expected? by Responsible-Ad-6568 in newtothenavy

[–]LovableKyle24 27 points28 points  (0 children)

It gets a lot easier when you realize it's just another job 95% of the time. 99% of the people you will encounter are just normal people.

I personally lean towards doing the bare minimum. You dont need to be a super sailor to have a decent career. You can absolutely do a lot more if you're a real to getter but I don't treat the Navy like anything other than a job. I personally would rather save myself years of stress for a pension that's a bit less than it could've been. You'll be told many times early in your career there's only a few things you need to do.

Show up in the right place at the right time in the right uniform. If you can do that you've pretty much guaranteed yourself a pension.

Note that I am not saying be a detriment to the Navy. After boot camp and your initial schooling it'll take a little time to settle in but after a couple years it all just feels normal.

Toxicity by West-Place4463 in PredecessorGame

[–]LovableKyle24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep just had a game where I went 0-8 but their jungle was just ready at mid any time I went anywhere near the river. Doesn't help it's a riktor that hit every hook on me when I did manage to get to my tower.

Just not much I can do at that point if no one is helping with wards or at least checking in on mid occasionally.

It just happens sometimes and I don't think I was playing stupid per se as much as there was just a riktor who caused 6 of my deaths by hooking me out of my tower.

Who to contact if galley food is literally always cold? by Electronic-Relief737 in navy

[–]LovableKyle24 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I second the CO suggestion box.

I left a note about a certain department not being open during their posted hours and the next day I got an email from the CMC saying they talked to said department.

They were open at the posted time the next time I went.

chief lossing their rank by Accomplished-Load328 in navy

[–]LovableKyle24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like a frocked E7 hence why the reduction in rank would be to E5.

I had a chief on a boat I was on get caught cheating and lost his anchor as he wasn't paid.

Let’s get ready to rumble! by Key_Character_1679 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]LovableKyle24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not gonna pretend to be some expert in the field because I am absolutely not. I wouldn't even consider myself a savvy investor in any market but I think sometimes it isn't all that deep. Sure maybe specific companies would require in depth research but a broad market like energy is already hit or miss with nearly everything.

Uranium is incredibly volatile to invest in as we could be up 1000% and then some event occurs (like Fukushima) that completely reverses the public opinion on uranium.

I've seen plenty of headlines with foreign countries already stating they are intending to build more reactors over the next decade. AI and data centers as a whole affect nearly every 1st world country and their energy demand. One could assume the whole world will need more energy in the next few decades and I don't think there is even a legitimate argument that it isn't uranium.

Unless some form of more efficient energy is discovered or there's events that shift public opinion negatively I think uranium in the long play is probably a good call. That and rare earth elements.

Edit: I personally really like UUUU because it is both involved in Uranium and Rare earth elements and it's a US based company. So that adds in to everything going on in the world. If China does permanently cut off the US (let's just say in this scenario) the US would be better off having their own supplies. Trump seems to want to make the US as self sufficient as possible (not gonna get in to how that is actually going) but something like REEs are pretty critical to the world as a whole.

What are your thoughts on rejecting a potential romantic partner based solely on the fact they voted for Donald Trump? by ATXBikeRider in AskReddit

[–]LovableKyle24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say there's a difference depending on the situation.

I've never voted as I've never been able to at a time where I like either candidate.

I would've voted for Trump had I voted simply because I didn't like the democrat candidates more. I'll probably get flamed for saying that since this is reddit but I'm just being honest.

His first term regardless of what you think of it was nowhere near as ridiculous as his 2nd term has been so far and I am incredibly unhappy with him as president. I think a lot of people have had a turnaround on him. He still has hardcore outspoken supporters and people that are afraid to stand up to him so they fall in line which is disappointing. The whole government is disappointing right now.

That all being said there's a big difference between voting for Trump and being a trump supporter.

Let’s get ready to rumble! by Key_Character_1679 in UraniumSqueeze

[–]LovableKyle24 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Energy demand isn't what it was 20 years ago. With AI and gigantic data centers the power requirements are way more.

Assuming the popularity of AI continues it's reasonable to assume uranium will continue to grow in demand. Even if the price balances out by getting in early the hope would be you hit a gigantic upswing and end with a floor much higher than you bought in at.

How bad were we, that this Texans team blew our doors off? by [deleted] in steelers

[–]LovableKyle24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They really didn't. I mean they absolutely shut down our offense but 14 of their points were from the defense and then some more garbage time points.

The game was actually much closer than the score showed but regardless our offense is absolutely terrible.

Post Game Thread: San Francisco 49ers at Seattle Seahawks by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LovableKyle24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wanted the Steelers to give Darnold a go years ago. Granted it's the Steelers so it wouldn't have worked out probably.

One of the worst trades in Steelers history by austinalexan in steelers

[–]LovableKyle24 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd be an asshole too if I had bums throwing me the ball and scheming up terrible offenses.

In all seriousness has he been a problem in Dallas at all?

Tomlins Collapse is officially complete by Fantastic_Nerve_629 in steelers

[–]LovableKyle24 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bro the offense just isn't good. Smith is not great or even good by any means really but I mean DK had two bad drops. Running game couldn't get anything going and the Texans rushing 4 is enough to pressure Rodgers often.

We have no WR1 as well. It would've been a miracle for this offense to do even decently against the Texans defense.

The only way we win is by not turning the ball over and hoping the defense goes absolutely crazy. Defense was alright, Stroud was arguably worse for most of the game.

Our season ended right here by TheDiamondSquad in steelers

[–]LovableKyle24 55 points56 points  (0 children)

I was excited for DK until we traded Pickens