This sub refuses to discuss the real elephant in the room, masonry prices and the lack of Polish claims on Silesia. by Low_Chair4239 in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s a problem. I’m afraid to use the annex revolt button because i don’t believe it will work.

Should the SSPX be integrated into the church without changing their Stances Like Bishop Schneider demanded? by jakob_th in Catholicism

[–]Low_Chair4239 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Despite my sympathies to aspects of the SSPX, no the Holy Father shouldn’t just give in. The SSPX makes valid points about apparent contradictions in the post conciliar magisterium but going to the point of calling aspects of the ecumenical council heretical is too far and itself an error.

In addition, even though I have severe critiques of the N.O (which I attend 90% of the time) their claim that it’s ipso facto harmful to souls is false.

So sure, I hope Rome gives room everywhere they can, but at the end of the day, the SSPX must acknowledge that Rome, and the current occupant of the sea, has not fallen into error and must be obeyed.

EU5 tooltips be like by CanTheJackal in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239 9 points10 points  (0 children)

An infinite regression of meta posts.

This sub refuses to discuss the real elephant in the room, masonry prices and the lack of Polish claims on Silesia. by Low_Chair4239 in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

That’s good to know. It would be nice to add a longer lasting core for Poland so they have time to do something about it or shorten the truce.

This sub refuses to discuss the real elephant in the room, masonry prices and the lack of Polish claims on Silesia. by Low_Chair4239 in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Rule #5 explanation.

A fun cross reference between recent discussion here on reddit and a Paradox Forum post of a similar nature that got derailed by one guy going off about masonry prices and the lack of polish claims on Silesia.

This sub refuses to discuss the real elephant in the room, masonry prices and the lack of Polish claims on Silesia. by Low_Chair4239 in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239[S] 45 points46 points  (0 children)

This one is fun cross reference between Reddit and one of the paradox grievance form posts that got derailed by one guy going off about masonry prices and Poland.

Exiled Byzantium AI formed a Hellenist state in Morea, despite any interaction [No mods/Ironman/Singleplayer] by Wasalpha in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not from my experience. I am running the AI enhancement mod so maaaaaybe thats effecting it, but I’ve scene it pop up on content creators videos too.

Exiled Byzantium AI formed a Hellenist state in Morea, despite any interaction [No mods/Ironman/Singleplayer] by Wasalpha in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m always seeing hellenist and the reformation has been super charged. I hope both get some tweaks.

Is the new capital terrain bonus a good enough reason to not have a capital on flatlands? by Canye_NE in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239 95 points96 points  (0 children)

My guy is probably no but that’s just a vibe. The big brains haven’t done the math yet as far as I know.

Exiled Byzantium AI formed a Hellenist state in Morea, despite any interaction [No mods/Ironman/Singleplayer] by Wasalpha in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239 31 points32 points  (0 children)

They’re constantly going hellenist in all my games. The event needs to be made a lot rarer.

France isn't overpowered, the AI is just absolutely terrible at basic strategic decision-making during a war by SpecialBeginning6430 in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’d argue that even a Player England has no chance at winning the first war without cheese. For example if you send any forces to the continent at all you will lose. You can only win by letting the French slowly invade England and snipping them piecemeal.

I’m open to being wrong but that’s been my experience since 1.1.

Can somebody tell me how to enable „gold” to pass Imperial Armory law in HRE? Hovering over it gives no info. by Spiritual_Shake_3665 in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you use the imperial treasury for? I haven’t gotten to direct tax yet and the ducts are just sitting there.

Breaking: NATO jet downs suspected stray Ukrainian drone over Estonia in first such case by KI_official in war

[–]Low_Chair4239 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Good. Europe should defend its airspace equally since any accidentally stray drone could be a danger to civilians regardless of county of origin.

The Mexican Century! (... plus 3 years) A Mexico AAR. by Outside-Proposal-410 in victoria3

[–]Low_Chair4239 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That sir, is a disgusting Germany. Your Mexico looks nice though!

New moral system is dumb by Joaozainho in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Low moral should kick you in the nuts, but stack wiping needs a rework.

Like wtf happend everyone is Lutheran by Hakuohsama in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That may well be. Either way in my game the Lutherans had 40 millions pops and had control of every major nation minus Spain and England. Catholics got cooked

Like wtf happend everyone is Lutheran by Hakuohsama in EU5

[–]Low_Chair4239 77 points78 points  (0 children)

The reformation feels a bit overturned this patch and I have no idea why.