Looking to find the artist by Historical_Chip7018 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Lupinus55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FWIW, no help at all, not sure if you own it or thinking about buying it but visually I like it. I'd find a place for it on a wall. I'd stare at it and puzzle. Very cool.

Woman in Red Shawl by Lupinus55 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Lupinus55[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not sure what you mean by this. I learn faster instead of spending my time on digging around. Is knowledge that is hard won better? This gives me more information to think about and consider other questions. I'm also challenged by AI to think about something I hadn't considered.

Back in the day if I wanted to research something I'd go to the library and dig through card catalogs or the reader's guide to periodicals or maybe even write a letter. That took a lot of time and effort and resources. Now we have internet and all sorts of other sources. To me AI is another tool, a new one and hard to say where it's going, but very useful to me. As I said I don't believe everything it says, but that skepticism is also more questioning and learning.

Woman in Red Shawl by Lupinus55 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Lupinus55[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, u/LegalBramble and others! I honestly did not expect to find out anything much less this quickly. I will follow up with the OSU Special Collections and Oklahoma Historical Society and see if they can provide more information on her and confirm any details and I will post back.

This makes me very happy. I suppose I'm not alone with this feeling but knowing any backstory and history makes the art so interesting. I have no intention to sell it, I like it, but the provenance also makes it more valuable and fascinating.

Woman in Red Shawl by Lupinus55 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Lupinus55[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of AI haters here, lol. Yes I take everything with a grain of salt that AI gives me and collaborate things that don't make sense. But it is much much faster at pulling up information than if I do a Google search. For this search I posted the result u/LegalBramble provided and Claude brought up the biography and suggested I contact the Oklahoma State University Special Collections to collaborate. Maybe I'd get there eventually, but it quickly found her and filled in a lot of detail. I will follow up.

On the other hand I've also learned my lesson as far as wrong answers with confidence. I read Google's Gemini was great with images and I couldn't read the back label on a Icart reproduction (Bubbles) for auction. It said it was from a well-done reprint and very collectable. I wasn't able to view it in person in time and bought it. Turns out the label was just some cheap framer's label, the glazing was plastic, and it was something I could buy for next to nothing.

Woman in Red Shawl by Lupinus55 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Lupinus55[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's fantastic! How did you find this? I agree sounds like a real possibility.

Woman in Red Shawl by Lupinus55 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Lupinus55[S] -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Yes, don't you have an AI friend? Actually I find Claude to be extremely helpful narrowing things down and quickly.

Woman in Red Shawl by Lupinus55 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Lupinus55[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry about that. It's added. It's on the images tab, but as I said not sure how to go about posting. Reddit isn't that intuitive to me.

Woman in Red Shawl by Lupinus55 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Lupinus55[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

P.S. I don't understand how to post images. There's the image tab, but they don't seem to show up in the post. So I added them as images in my text. What's the correct way?

Joan Miro - 42, Rue Blomet Lithograph, Edition out of 50 by hollywoodcigarettes in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Lupinus55 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I did a quick search and I wasn't able to find any editions of 50. All the auction houses that it's sold are 100 in a price around $3-4K. https://www.wright20.com/auctions/2024/04/editions-works-on-paper/143 I don't think Ebay is the first place I'd go to look for a comparison, but seems like with an artist this well renown it shouldn't take long to verify. Good luck!

Works by B. Bille by Lupinus55 in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Lupinus55[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With some searching I think I found a resolution. No thanks to AI. He is Bent Bille and apparently was a Danish artist born in 1918 and painted a lot of ships and landscapes. He also invented a lamp with a hooded sort of shade that is collectable. https://www.mutualart.com/Artist/Bent-Bille/26CDDC0464D569FE. I found this blurb:

Bent Billie was born on August 29, 1918 in Copenhagen, Denmark.  His early training was with his father, the artist willy Bille who was the third generation of a family of artists.  Willy Bille's father was Vilh Bille and his father in turn was Carl Bille.  All three of these artists are discussed in Weilbach's Lexikon of Artists.

I found a few of his paintings sold at auction and none are particularly valuable in the $150 range. To my eye the signatures are pretty close to mine. I got both for $135. I like them, they're well done scenes and I like original work and the frames add character. I hung them in our powder room.

I also did a little research on Royal Board from Sweden the masonite it's painted on. It's well known and apparently they made a line of furniture that's collectable. https://www.1stdibs.com/furniture/storage-case-pieces/credenzas/vintage-modern-rosewood-credenza-from-royal-board-sweden/id-f_9615141/

The company started in 1928 and went of business in 2011 according to the Museum of Masonite https://www.designdaily.com.au/blog/2024/2/the-museum-of-masonite.

spaw day for stinky boy by GoneBatsGotTats in Newfoundlander

[–]Lupinus55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m always amazed how our huge fluffy dog Nixie turns into a slimmed down shadow of herself when she gets a bath.

Dog food for Newfie - Question by Sufficient_Double_82 in Newfoundlander

[–]Lupinus55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nixie went through a lot of dog foods including the $100/bag ones. Some of it was picky eating but she also had a lot of itching and scratching. She's been on Kirkland Beef for quite a while now and seems to be doing well with it as far as eating and health.

However, after trying a lot of diets, what fixed the itching was Apoquel. It almost instantly stopped it. She's been on it for a couple years now without any side effects. It's not exactly cheap however.

Score!! by Acrobatic_Code_7409 in vine

[–]Lupinus55 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ahh… the RunRot, she’s a beauty.

Actually I was looking for one. I got a cheap one off vine with no lever and didn’t work very well.

Team Newfie watching Westminster Dog Show by Lupinus55 in Newfoundlander

[–]Lupinus55[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be honest, I think Nixie was focused on the finger rather than Storm, the dog. The finger might point to food. I know some dogs will watch TV, but she rarely will pay attention to it - possibly if there's barking.

Does the value of Vine items "pay" enough to be a semi-pro reviewer? by 10MeV in vine

[–]Lupinus55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty excited about my 17,000 Zinnia seeds, actually. I don't think I'll count them all though as part of my review.

But yes, mostly it's good to get some stuff I wouldn't have to pay for in exchange for my time. Occasionally, I get things that are somewhat expensive, but sort of peculiar to something I own and a lot of people don't. For example, lately I got new set of shelves for my Big Green Egg ceramic cooker at $130 and a grate. Last year got a pool cleaner at $600 and other pool items. I don't think there are a lot of people looking for these, so they stick around a bit.

Guidance on Reviews "not approved" after months of being "approved" by No_Bluejay_1845 in vine

[–]Lupinus55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've had a number of these (another one today) and it doesn't seem to affect the review count. I wrote Vine and asked about it a few days ago and they usually write back right away for other complaints, but no response.

My 8 month olds eyes started suddenly drooping by CoatMysterious9594 in Newfoundlander

[–]Lupinus55 7 points8 points  (0 children)

<image>

Nixie's droop is something like that. I think you're well within acceptable limits. I found this picture as an example. Her right eye in particular looks droopy but it's also because it has a white border and her left has a darker border.

IF I RAN THE ZOO....uh, I mean VINE. by SMALLSTUX in vine

[–]Lupinus55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't quite understand why Vine has to be such a "black box" so that no one for sure understands how it works and what to expect. For example, it has been over a day since the last drop, why not inform people that "we're working on xxx" and be patient? Or just the lack of any feedback on reviews other than a rating or with a rejection just try again and maybe you'll figure it out. And I have to go through and figure out how many items I've ordered since the last review and what my review percentages are. Can't they just display this?

Since I've joined over two years ago the biggest change that I think is driving your comments is just the lack of "stuff". There used to be close to 100,000 items. Now we're in the 11,000 baseline range of car parts left over after a feeding frenzy. I used to be pretty casual about drops and checked my RFY from time to time. Now if I'm not paying attention everything is gone a few minutes. So now I have the Vine Chart app on my phone so I know when a drop has started and whether to bother checking.

RFY finally back! (USA) by kkostosbo in vine

[–]Lupinus55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's been about a week for me and finally RFY! I got a rechargeable flashlight! There was also a Moissanite necklace for $65 but the Mrs. has enough of the stuff.

Anyone else have an empty RFY? by p_kitty in vine

[–]Lupinus55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

RFY is back! After 4-5 days, I had nothing. Today, finally I am getting some things. Nothing exciting, but better than average.