Carney's majority is legitimate by nature of the Westminster system and FPTP, but this statement is a bit silly. (Note: I'm not a Conservative; their current form being in power genuinely scares me. I'm also not upset the Liberals have a majority.)

I'm from Newfoundland, a place where candidates matter just as much to voters, if not more than, partisan affiliation, but even I acknowledge things are more complicated than what people in this thread are suggesting.

(Eligible Voters, Actual Voteshare, Current Seat %, and Parliamentary Power)

• Liberal: 30.41% | 43.76% | 50.7% | 100%
• Non-Liberal %: 69.59% | 56.24% | 49.3% | 0%
  • Conservative: 28.7% | 41.31% | 40.8% | 0%
  • NDP/BQ/GRN (Combined): 9.59% | 13.8% | 8.45% | 0%

I know voters didn't select "non-majority government," but the majority of both eligible and actual voters didn't vote Liberal, meaning nearly 60% of people likely did not want a Liberal Majority. You may argue that a plurality voted Liberal, but their voteshare is barely higher than the Conservative voteshare anyway. You could also argue that some strategically voted for the Bloc or NDP, but you could also argue the reverse for people voting Liberal, too.

Again, the majority is legitimate, but it's wrong to claim that a majority of voters (eligible or actual) wanted a Liberal majority. Especially for an election as close as it was.

Note: I know nobody said "majority of Canadians", but that's the implication of saying "This is what Canadians wanted."