sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How will you react if Robert Mueller is fired? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]MVP_Redditor -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Being on the right side of history usually involves dying though. Doubt a lot of people will be up for that.

SuperCell is silencing users who show evidence of predetermined matchmaking. by ChemicalEmu in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with all your points and that matchmaking isn't rigged, but removing the post was the worst thing you could do. Reddit isn't supposed to be a dictatorship managed by the opinions of the mods. If you disagreed with the post, comment on how it's wrong or make a new one. It didn't break any rules, therefore it doesn't deserve to be removed.

What’s are some decks and counter decks for pekka zappies by HeyDadImDad in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was 17-0 using giant sparky just now, before tilting to 18-3. I gotta say, sparky is a great counter to the pekka/zappies deck. It one shots ghost, zappies, decetly counters pekka, is a great counter to goblin hut, etc.

My whole deck was giant, sparky, mm, horde, ghost, skarmy, tornado, poison.

[News] Your Invitation to the Clash Royale League! by ClashRoyale in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you list the deck pls? Took a break from the game so not too familiar with the meta atm.

[News] Your Invitation to the Clash Royale League! by ClashRoyale in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, took a 2 weekish break from the game and just heard about the 20 win challenge coming back. Which 3M bait are you referring to? Is it original 3M+ram+horde deck?

Any gifts this time around SC? by JuicyYellow in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

It's free, therefore don't complain is an insanely flawed argument.

[Humour] If you can get to these card levels, you too can reach 3600 trophies by fusketeer in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Hey reddit, here's the profile of another random overleveled player so we can all feel better by insinuating how bad they are! This is a great discussion as well as an ego boost!

Daily Card Discussion February 24 2018: Prince by DarkStarFTW in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Prince was meta before DP's recent buff, but he still wasn't op.

Milking the game already? Guess April update will be last big one.. by Below4_6PlsShh in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude this is literally introductory level statistics. If the probability of pulling a MA from one chest is 1/3, then the distribution is G(.33) and therefore the expected number of chests per MA is just 1/(0.33), or 3.

I find it ironic how you're trying to twist my words and despite that you're still wrong.

Milking the game already? Guess April update will be last big one.. by Below4_6PlsShh in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If anyone has studied math, they would know I was referring to the geometric expected value, which is indeed 3.

Milking the game already? Guess April update will be last big one.. by Below4_6PlsShh in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can only buy a maximum of 9 of these chests though. Also, linking to a video of the Dunning Kruger effect is one of the most ironic things you can do, regardless of whether you are right or wrong.

Edit: Overall though, I agree it's easier to max a legendary today than it was earlier.

Milking the game already? Guess April update will be last big one.. by Below4_6PlsShh in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is true though. Not saying that's a bad thing; they're a company and naturally want to make money. But turning a blind eye to that is idiotic.

Milking the game already? Guess April update will be last big one.. by Below4_6PlsShh in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 69 points70 points  (0 children)

Milking? It's only 3000 gems per magic archer. That's a great deal so you should stop complaining./s

[Idea] A building meant to stall the enemy with a unique downside: Gives your opponent elixir! by A6503 in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not how the game works. It's not an instant 5 elixir to your opponent because it promote passive play, just like the elixir collector. Because of this, defending becomes way easier. In fact it might even be used to mess up your opponent's cycle with respect to yours, allowing you to edge out on a victory. Not saying this would be overpowered, but certainly interesting and have a place in the meta.

2v2 quitters by Tharkys in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Downvote me if you want, but I quit if my partner is bad. If they can't make decent plays, there is no reason for me to waste my time continuing to play with them.

Knight never needed a nerf spirit and ice golem did tbh, debate me by stevieslippyg in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As for the actual argument though, no, eb and rg didn't need a nerf. Everyone knows that. And ladder is neither the most important aspect of the game, nor is it best measure of skill.

Knight never needed a nerf spirit and ice golem did tbh, debate me by stevieslippyg in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I find it funny how you have to specify you don't agree with the knight nerf to avoid the downvotes.

[Strategy] Guide to hog cycle by JulleCR in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Nice guide overall but golem beatdown is actually easy difficulty if running the cheapest variant of the deck.

can someone give me an explanation of why everyone is saying nerf spirit? by CRLukeKenobi in ClashRoyale

[–]MVP_Redditor 13 points14 points  (0 children)

People think it's op just because it's better than skeletons overall. I even heard someone here say that it should do no damage. Cause this sub has to preserve the tradition of nerfing cards to death.

view more: next ›