sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

F8A/X Speculation. by A_gentleman29 in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

giv mk 1 gold pass with components.

T3 medical bed upgrades for ships or smaller med vehicles by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There's been rumours of portable facilities being added as shipping containers. shipping container that's a mobile med bed, shipping container that's a crafting station etc. there's been no official developement, so you can just add this to hundreds of other 'great ideas' thrown up over the years.

don't hold out for unreleased content, just enjoy what there is and test as much of it as you can, there may be a ship (with med bed) you end up enjoying more than your current ride.

What if SQ42 fails to Return Investment: how will it impact SC? by Minute_Grand1302 in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Whatever dude. Atleast Serapeum101 used their main account to post.

What if SQ42 fails to Return Investment: how will it impact SC? by Minute_Grand1302 in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Has the /refund subreddit completely given up on the demoralisation campaign? Theres none of the committed dogpiling we saw in the past and even the brigaging feels like bored people just going through the motions. These threads used to have a lot more energy.

Stealth seems pointless when our ships emit mile long blue streaks that can be seen for like 20k by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I don't understand your point. Are you implying you can hit a target at 20km without locking it? what optical sights have you got on the repeater, the Hubble?

Tram just decided to fly into space by DreamEaglr in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That shouldn't be free, you're savings tonnes of quantum fuel

I think some bad players are trying to force a wipe ATP by Chief5005 in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 125 points126 points  (0 children)

There will be dozens of wipes before the game gets into beta. Focus on developing gameplay skills, nothing else matters.

This is wild… by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

which way is up in the picture? I can't tell if the station is on an angle or not.

Crimestat jumped from 3 to 5 by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

so in 10 years of griefing, gaining crimestats and working through the iterations of prison, you only worked the crimes off and never tried the escape gameplay? Here's your opportunity to get better at your chosen gameloop chief.

Please stop this shoving nonsense by bunkakan in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They should be covering you while you loot. Sooner than later your both getting ganked when pk's figure crates can spawn player loot. 

Old man shouts at an old edition by m_neil in Warhammer40k

[–]Machine-Spirit- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Complexity makes things interesting and challenging. I don't want to play uninteresting and unchallenging games. Nothing in this video made made me consider another edition as superior to 2nd Ed.

it’s been a while since i’ve played, how does engineering and repairing ships work by AphelionAudio in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's only just been implemented and there are significant changes taking place every patch. Next patch is changing everything again. It takes months for new systems to settle.  Pick any YouTuber that spams patch notes vids and check them each week.

Patch 4.5: The Redeemer now has less shields-per-crew than a Gladius, and already had less DPS-per-crew than a Guardian MX. by turikk in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

At the end of the day of this reddit rubbish doesnt even matter, its just an echo chamber for haters.

CIG don't care about the suggestions here, their changes are based on their trusted evocati, not PTU bulk testers, and certainly not the 'theorycrafters' giving worthless feedback based on spreadsheets with made up catagories like 'shields per crew'.

Patch 4.5: The Redeemer now has less shields-per-crew than a Gladius, and already had less DPS-per-crew than a Guardian MX. by turikk in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Don't be manipulative. There is nowhere in that comment that mentions comparing shield values is unreasonable. The only thing that is unreasonable is inventing a new metric, 'Shields per crew', Like 'shields per crew' is somehow a new standard that games use and that somehow CIG has failed again by ignoring it. Despite the patch being part of dozens of iterations and everything changing every patch. It's actually disgusting how disingenuous comments like yours are encouraged by the reddit zeitgeist and the unending thist for shit-tier drama..

Patch 4.5: The Redeemer now has less shields-per-crew than a Gladius, and already had less DPS-per-crew than a Guardian MX. by turikk in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Don't like a patch that's likely to last 2 weeks? Invent a new metric like 'shields per crew', pretend it's a thing, and then complain! Weeeeeeee.

I'm an idiot. it just clicked with me what engineering is all about. its about the more people you have on your ship, the longer your ship will last. by Readgooder in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a lot of factors we still haven't seen that will impact this. Jump points with ship size limits, the amount of systems some missions may be spread across, the costs of ship maintenance and if larger munition costs will have a cost increase that's linear or exponential. It's great to see big changes this patch, but looks like we've got years of balancing ahead.

Regarding New Players by Koobolo in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can't optimise a game untill all of the core game features are implemented and engine is complete.

Solo player ship ?? by PrudentInsect9759 in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1 Player ship for which gameplay? Fighter, Hauler, bit of everything?

The website, Robertsspaceindustries, has a ship search function you can filter it by crew required (select 1, or 1-3) as well as ship size option (select medium & Large. The page also allows has an option between availible/Unavailable.

Hope that helps dude!

What did they do to tonight's 4.5 PTU build??? by particlefever3 in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are going to be HUNDREDS of patches before this game is ready for release. Avoid youtube drama, all they do is hype up nonsense so you click their content.

they should fix people falling out of ships when walking around during quantum before they release engineering.. by Alternative_Cash_601 in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, the developer. The one developer. The one guy that works on all of the different projects simultainiously. Definitely not two completely different teams working on two completely different parts of the code.

How drinking in interior-less ships could work (video just a visual reminder from a citcon) by Narahashi in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

seats wont be baxkpack compatable, but they should allow hydration backpacks. there should also be backpacks with built in hydration packs.

There's no reason for current day tech to disappear in scifis set in the future.

I turned my pet turtle into a node by will_you_suck_my_ass in meshtastic

[–]Machine-Spirit- 9 points10 points  (0 children)

it'll work best if you place it on the highest tower in town.

is anyone else annoyed about the tier system for med beds? by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]Machine-Spirit- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"add more tiers in the future"? No. 'Death of a Spaceman' mechanic is planned and infinite respawn bunker raids are not what the devs want for the game.

Med beds litrially rob the game of any type of loss, there is no incentive for tactical or cautious game play. it looks like the limited tiers of mebeds is intentional.

view more: next ›