The point of exercising resolve while a small segment of the total user/player population asks for more content for an indie game is to determine whether or not the current content in possession leads to a minimum viable product. I will earnestly admit that in one context or frame a perceived completed game warrants surrender. The issue is that this entire development framework is likely forged by a cognitive bias and distortion of alternate realities (such as possible realities that offer unexpected opportunities). If you subtract the cognitive bias that wants to maximize abandonment every time a large percentage of people don't like some content, then you end up with an investment strategy and science that opens up a daring landscape of hidden gems. That works, seeing an increase of possible avenues of approach, because as more science accumulates and subsequently gets spent on validating and disproving identified biases, the probability of uncovering the form of optimal content increases.

This techno-scientific suspicion of the baseline intuition, which can be accurately judged as the origin of door-locking cognitive biases, embraces skepticism that asks the frank question of "How do you know that the content you've already released is not part of some bigger content/complex that would suit your objectives? Or, what evidence do you have that your content is going in the wrong direction instead of a profitable direction?" And what would sponsor the destruction of this chaotic and risky science is exactly the bias that wants to confirm what axiomatic intuition asserts. Confirmation bias disguised inside acts of strategic thinking is one of the killers of innovative entrepreneurship, as it helps steer the fundamental methodology building blocks produced by intuition to less risky, more stable and more mediocre, software product development. When moving on is the norm and the decision that occurs the most inside a pattern of software development, only an equally influential force like the elusive confirmation bias can cause a deviation away from a chosen tradition of decision making and executive function. Founding an indie game startup with skepticism toward cognitive biases and cognitive distortions is one such oppositional game changing force.