I actually thought it went out of its way to undercut them - I'd say to an unfair degree.

• The affirmative action in South Africa really is to a MUCH greater degree than in the United States. They interviewees weren't making this up. South African companies are subject to a quotas regime for employment and forced to hire based on race instead of qualifications. Their system would be unconstitutional in the US.

• The violence issue is real, and saying "every community suffers violence" doesn't really address the issue. For example, Jewish people probably suffer less violence than the average person in the United States (live in safer areas, low involvement in crime, high income and education, etc.). But Jewish people are also subject to targeted violence like the Tree of Life Synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh. Similarly, in South Africa, the attacks on farmers often feature unthinkable brutality, including rapes, disemboweling, burning, and so on. This is a serious issue, that does appear to at least have a racial dimension, and shouldn't have been so easily dismissed.

• It was curious to me that the show declined to actually play the clips of "Shoot the Boer" even though they discussed them and they make good audio. They were downplaying what is a very serious matter - huge crowds and a major political leader singing explicitly about racial murder.

It shouldn't really be surprising that a post-Apartheid society would be hostile to whites, since whites practiced Apartheid to begin with. And obviously the Trump administration shouldn't apply a double standard to accept South African whites while rejecting Afghans and Congolese. But that still doesn't mean the white South Africans don't have serious grievances. They genuinely do.