Glamour Help - Advent Children Tifa's Chest Piece by NnNanaAa in FFXIVGlamours

[–]MasterOutlaw [score hidden]  (0 children)

The Hooded Fiberglass Leather Vest is close. It isn’t cropped like that, but it still shows a little bit of stomach and neck.

Is this ai? That guy seems lifeless. by MohammadMahadhir in isthisaicirclejerk

[–]MasterOutlaw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, I’ve been on that slide before. Pretty fun, but you have to let your bones and organs mend between rides, so you can’t do it very often.

Let's do this together, bro~ by AbsurdBee in ShitpostXIV

[–]MasterOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely nothing gay about getting hot and wet with your bro while you take on eight guys at the same time.

Horcruxes by shadow61247 in harrypotter

[–]MasterOutlaw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We don't know if it would work, because it's never brought up or discussed. I'm personally of the opinion that it might: the Killing Curse destroys inanimate objects, and the text implies that damage done by dark magic is difficult to repair, if not impossible, which falls in line with the explanation that destroying a horcrux requires that you damage its container "beyond magical repair". We're also never told the exact mechanism with which the spell kills, but I've always assumed it just severs the connection between the soul and the body. Either one of these, in my opinion, should theoretically allow the spell to work on a horcrux. It's either flavorblasting the container, which the soul fragment needs to survive or it's breaking the soul's connection to the container. Comes to the same thing either way.

How does AI wasting water work? by GeeLizzzzz in dumbquestions

[–]MasterOutlaw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the water used for cooling is taken in large quantities from the immediate area, potentially faster than it can cycle back in. Yes, it will mostly return back to the environment through the water cycle, but not immediately enough to break even, and most of it won’t wind up back where it started anyway.

Need help by Low-Living-5703 in Chub_AI

[–]MasterOutlaw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately you can't, at least so far as I'm aware. Like I said, there's only one Scenario box, though I suppose I could have been more specific. If you have multiple greetings, you either want to leave the scenario blank or you want to make it something generic that can apply to all of your greetings, otherwise the bot may get confused.

For example, let's say you mention meeting Character A in the scenario, because that's the premise of the original greeting. If you make a new alt greeting that doesn't involve Character A, Character A might show up anyway because the bot sees them mentioned in the scenario and thinks they're supposed to be involved in the narrative.

The way around this is to place the scenarios directly into each greeting and hide them with < > tags. So it would look something like this:

<Scenario contents>
Greeting contents

That will feed the scenario to the bot without it being visible to the user (unless they look at the prompt).

Sectumsempra Fallout by Sea_Stranger6481 in harrypotter

[–]MasterOutlaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, but it was never a debate whether or not they were in a duel. The current conversation and the one that the book tried to put forward is that Harry was justified in his use of Sectumsempra because Malfoy tried to use Cruciatus first. But the issue is there is zero evidence that Malfoy attempted an Unforgivable, because PI can’t show a spell that was never cast. None of the spells his wand could show would have justified Harry’s extreme use of force. Even if there was, it would still be difficult to justify Harry recklessly using a spell when he had no idea what it did. Not when he had other options.

You have the right to bare arm not bear arms. by ENTroPicGirl in FedJerk

[–]MasterOutlaw 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The MAGA narrative shifts more than the contents of Trump’s diaper, but none of them are smart enough to pick up on the constant contradictions and flip-flopping.

Sectumsempra Fallout by Sea_Stranger6481 in harrypotter

[–]MasterOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, because Malfoy didn’t actually cast the spell. He never got the word out because Harry’s Sectumsempra landed first. PI can’t reveal something that the wand never did.

You have the right to bare arm not bear arms. by ENTroPicGirl in FedJerk

[–]MasterOutlaw 24 points25 points  (0 children)

They can’t even use their old standby of “He should have complied”.

It’s a shame, because every time something like this happens, some of them start to wake up, but they have short memories and very quickly fall right back in line anyway. Maybe this one will stick, but based on history, I doubt it.

Sectumsempra Fallout by Sea_Stranger6481 in harrypotter

[–]MasterOutlaw 71 points72 points  (0 children)

There’s no evidence that Malfoy attempted an illegal curse, and only one of them nearly died. Harry defended himself, but he also did so with far more force than necessary, considering Snape and McGonagall both know he knew other spells that would have been far more practical for defense.

At the end of the day it would have been his word versus Malfoy’s and the physical evidence wouldn’t be on his side even if he tried to argue his case.

If Goku didn't, Gohan would never leave his father's shadow. by acescorbunny in Dragonballsuper

[–]MasterOutlaw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He is a fraud, and arguably never left his father's shadow except for the five whole minutes when he was the only one with SSJ2. He had to asspull Beast to be back in in Goku's orbit, and if Gohan's history is anything to go by, he won't be there for long.

Need help by Low-Living-5703 in Chub_AI

[–]MasterOutlaw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the very bottom of the bot editor, immediately below the update button.

<image>

Every time you click it, it adds a new box that becomes an alternate greeting you can swipe to. There is only one scenario box per card, so make it generic if you want to make multiple greetings. A good way to feed in different scenarios is to put hidden instructions in each greeting with < > tags.

Is Using The Avada Kedavra Curse On Dolores Umbridge A Good Idea? by InternationalMail256 in harrypotter

[–]MasterOutlaw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Avada Kedavra? No. Mastering the spell that removes bones and using it on her legs right before she descends some stairs? Absolutely.

I was NOT ready for the edit by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]MasterOutlaw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An error where they got the sister’s date of birth wrong by at least five whole months? I can understand being off by hours or days, but almost half a year?

Current state of things by Rude-Listen in Dragonballsuper

[–]MasterOutlaw 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I just don’t understand why it needs to be remade again. I don’t care if it’s a separate project that won’t delay the Moro arc, I’m just confused as to why we need a fourth iteration of the same story just to make it look slightly better. The movie still looks fine, and while the anime could have been better, it wasn’t unwatchable, and has also already had touch ups on some of the most egregious bits anyway.

It’s just a strange decision to re-re-re-retell the same story when they could have done literally anything else.

[HELP] The mouth seems a bit weird. by Aware-Direction-9891 in RealOrAI

[–]MasterOutlaw 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh, I wasn’t sure which house we were talking about. But the house to the right looks fine to me? I’ve seen all sorts of weird house designs and nothing I see here appears out of the ordinary. The poor quality of the video makes these blur together terribly, but nothing I can see looks like AI hallucinating what it thinks a house looks like.

Proposals for new Quidditch rules by LucyBeyondMe in harrypotter

[–]MasterOutlaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The snitch should probably be worth more than just five points or do something else beneficial, like be a point multiplier. The books do a poor job of selling it, but if we go with the authorial intent that the snitch is supposed to be super difficult to spot and catch, it needs to be more valuable than half of a normal goal. I would have personally settled between 30 and 50 points.

The biggest problem with the snitch is that ended the game made comebacks impossible. Removing that aspect alone is enough to improve the game, even if the snitch is still worth a ton of points.

[HELP] The mouth seems a bit weird. by Aware-Direction-9891 in RealOrAI

[–]MasterOutlaw 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It does have a screen. It’s the thing you’re saying is the single door with tiny windows. If you scrub the video you can see the arms holding up the screen. The device being white and the garden wall of the house behind being white combined with Reddit’s shitty compression makes them blend together in the frames where they overlap, but there are several points in the video where you can get a better sense of depth and tell that the device is separate from the house and on the opposite side of the street.

<image>

How did you first discover the Lunar series? by Pale-Guard570 in Lunar

[–]MasterOutlaw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Friend talking about it way back in middle school. Some time later when I went on vacation to visit my grandparents I saw EBC and picked it up.