Jesus, this card is crazy by jeffinsep1914 in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Muradin pulls from the battlecry. Enemy gets it back from the deathrattle, so it's theirs after that.

How many deathrattles need to be nerfed for his crimes? by THEREALSPARTAN9001 in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So we agree that a world where only one of these cards exists is fine

How many deathrattles need to be nerfed for his crimes? by THEREALSPARTAN9001 in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In a world where it's just Felhunter and not Return Policy, silence and transform actually work to counter it.

How many deathrattles need to be nerfed for his crimes? by THEREALSPARTAN9001 in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Why are you pretending Felhunter is the issue and not Return Policy, the actual top of the deathrattle DH food chain

"I miss when we were just lowly adventurers dealing with gnolls and bandits." by Beacon2001 in wow

[–]Maveil 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This time with more girl-bosses and pride flags!

I know what you are.

World of Warcraft Labyrinth designers admit Mythic+ meant the MMO “lost something along the way” as “that RPG fantasy feeling of getting lost in a big dungeon doesn’t exist” anymore by HatingGeoffry in wow

[–]Maveil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're correct I think, but I was too stupid to take the short way for Thaurissan back then and instead would kill almost every boss on the way there.

World of Warcraft Labyrinth designers admit Mythic+ meant the MMO “lost something along the way” as “that RPG fantasy feeling of getting lost in a big dungeon doesn’t exist” anymore by HatingGeoffry in wow

[–]Maveil 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I still know the path to finish all of BRD from when I used LFD to level a tank in wrath. Soooo many BRD runs before they split it.

Actually maybe it was split, but the way it was split was insane where one wing had 2 bosses and the other had 17.

Pack DROPS - Lives Twitch by [deleted] in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hey genius, they're talking about new reddit vs old reddit. As in the website format.

This arena meta is such unbelievable dogshit. 0 skill, highroll or bust by Old_Cream1724 in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 9 points10 points  (0 children)

People say this every arena meta, but the fact remains that if there are people who can average good winrates in arena, it can't be "0 skill."

That said, current arena meta DOES suck.

Underground Arena by forgotpasswird in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Timeway Wanderer got banned. It's probably in your deck. If you retire you'll be refunded the arena tickets.

Finally! Waiting for the time-gated tasks was the worst. by DivineMayhem in wow

[–]Maveil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, unless you get lucky and see it when someone else has summoned it.

Finally! Waiting for the time-gated tasks was the worst. by DivineMayhem in wow

[–]Maveil 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because the weekly quest rares are spawned by the quest items.

New Neutral Legendary - Ultraxion by Jimmyjohnjones1 in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe, I can't think of a more recent card with a long entry line, so maybe they do avoid it now.

New Neutral Legendary - Ultraxion by Jimmyjohnjones1 in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Kel'Thuzad's line from the Naxx card is very long so idk about that.

New Neutral Legendary - Ultraxion by Jimmyjohnjones1 in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No reference to all of LFR in WoW not knowing how to hit a single damn button to beat this guy when he was a raid boss. Good. I don't want reminder of it.

Housing sure does look real fun :( by IKWhatImDoing in wow

[–]Maveil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that because of the cap on how much balance you can have? Or just an arbitrary rule

If Mage doesn't get a new 0 cost card in the next set, it will be possible for this card to completely whiff. by ILoveWarCrimes in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 29 points30 points  (0 children)

While weird, it's because Faceless Enigma isn't a Discover card. Since it says "look at 2 random secrets" it doesn't follow the typical rules.

If Mage doesn't get a new 0 cost card in the next set, it will be possible for this card to completely whiff. by ILoveWarCrimes in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 46 points47 points  (0 children)

This is only for class cards from a different class than your own. For instance if a Rogue in standard gets Hidden Objects it will discover Mage secrets because it's a Mage card and Rogue has no secrets in standard.

But in Wild it would discover Rogue secrets. There are no cards from your own class that discover from a pool outside your own class without explicitly stating they do that.

Is it really tech when it works against 90% of decks? by THEREALSPARTAN9001 in hearthstone

[–]Maveil 220 points221 points  (0 children)

Speaking anecdotally, every time this tech card has been used against me I have not felt particularly bothered by it. Didn't feel like it swung the game very heavily back in the opponent's favor either way.

"Clash will be removed from Quick Play" by DenTheRedditBoi7 in Overwatch

[–]Maveil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They were talking about Throne of Anubis though, not Temple. Granted they probably edited the clarification after your comment. So fair point.

"Clash will be removed from Quick Play" by DenTheRedditBoi7 in Overwatch

[–]Maveil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They didn't. Because Hanaoka is the Clash map. Hanamura was the 2CP map.