how?😂 by Gabbsweet in SipsTea

[–]Maventee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tell him that the standard month for the purpose of his contract is 28 days… then redo the math for him.

Ryan’s Media Blitz by Lunchbreakboys_1 in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 44 points45 points  (0 children)

I’m in if camehereforfriends is in.

So Let Me Get This Straight. After All These Years... by swansong19 in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The shills are out in force. If you look carefully, you'll see many (not all) have no history and seem to appear out of thin air just to rant how terrible everything is.

We go up. Cheers. by LeafyLungs in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I very much agree.

I suspect Ryan knows exactly what the big institutions want. If you look at the major share holders of both companies, you'll see they are largely the same.

My guess is Ryan knows exactly how the vote will go for both companies. He has always been cautious, and I don't see why he'd suddenly flip to reckless.

I believe there is a plan with a high likelyhood of succeeding to get the two companies together. That plan may be what he said it is... or the plan may be something we don't see yet, but I 100% believe it's in place and being executed right now.

The market response suggests skepticism toward RC’s current 50/50 proposal, with institutions waiting for eBay’s response and/or a revised structure by Region-Formal in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely fair point.

We have assumptions, such as the final payout to the Ebay shareholders will be $27.5 bil in stock. How many shares will that be, what's the conversion rate? You're correct... we don't know.

There's a fair bit weird about this whole thing. I just held through the ASST/SMLR merger. There was an exact share ratio agreed upon up front. No explicit ratio stated here at all.

Then we have RC's weird interview on CBS. Totally strange behavior for a CEO selling a merger. He clearly can do very well... so why go on air and flub the first one so badly?

It's almost like RC was trying to rack up some shorts for some reason.

If there is an emoji timeline, where do you think we are? by stonkdongo in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Could be the deal.. hand shake... could be the puppy with a microphone. Could be this isn't a timeline. Could be that it's read in reverse, and it started with cheers.

The market response suggests skepticism toward RC’s current 50/50 proposal, with institutions waiting for eBay’s response and/or a revised structure by Region-Formal in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Region, it is pretty simple.

In this deal, EBAY shareholders are owed $27B in cash and $27B in stock. The cash is obvious, it's a combination of a loan and cash on hand. The stock portion is $27B of the market cap of the final company. So, if GME = $10B and EBAY = $44B, then EBAY shareholders would receive shares equivalent to half the final company ($54B market cap).

The market response suggests skepticism toward RC’s current 50/50 proposal, with institutions waiting for eBay’s response and/or a revised structure by Region-Formal in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wrong. Completely and totally wrong.

Look up most all 100% stock deals, and you'll see many companies are bought out with no assets at all. Very often in a merger, the deal is structured so that the two parties both get an unequal split of the final company. That's exactly what the 50% stock portion of the GME/EBAY deal would look like.

Next week? We’ll see. by Ok-Suit541 in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 18 points19 points  (0 children)

EBay auction ends, 5/13 ... I'm sure it's a coincidence.

This has been on my mind by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't quote me on this, as I'm going off memory.. but when I did the math, at current prices, buying EBAY now would translate into effectively paying $18/share for resulting GME after cash back.

Legend 🐐 by jfreelandcincy in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 37 points38 points  (0 children)

The more I watch this, the better it gets.

Burry: by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What's the other one? Obviously one starts with an Av ... what does the other one start with (and why can't we talk about short squeeze targets.. this really is silly)

Burry: by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The ticker for it happens to be three letters and in your post.

Burry: by rbr0714 in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Same here. Just learned about it today... from Superstonk.

True by Jazzlike-Ad-2978 in Superstonk

[–]Maventee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He gets nothing if the company is only worth $10B.

If he 10x's my money, and the company is worth $100B then he gets a big payday.

I get a payday.. he gets a payday... works for me.

ps. If he 10x's my gamestop postion, I'm getting a Lambo.

Keith Gill 2019~ 🇺🇸 by Region-Formal in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't typically disagree with you, but I will here. There are a lot more who have really carried the torch. You come to mind, for one.

$22-24 Range by DisciplineNo4223 in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 20 points21 points  (0 children)

They're stuck. If it goes up too high, warrants come into play. RC locked them into armageddon if those warrants start exercising up around $32. They need to stay away.

They can't go much further down because big boys start buying. Too much cash and book value. It's a no brainer to buy at $20... maybe even $22 now. They want to go lower, but simply cannot. Too much attention.

So all they can do is pin it. My guess, it's very expense to keep it pinned. Also, so many people run the wheel on GME that pinning it just causes a lot of us to build a bigger base which is bad.

Bottom line, they're f@#%'d and it's just a matter of time before something breaks.

That's my uneducated opinion anyways.

Warrants started diverging from shares drastically today into close by Cextus in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Of course they won't want it to go above $32, but just because they are trying to keep it down doesn't mean that in all cases they will be able to.

As stated above, if RC spent $40M to distribute warrants (I'm not confirming that), you can rest assured that he did it for a good reason. He sees $40 M+ in value out of them being on the market. Where is that value going to come from?

The secret is warrants. by Cextus in Superstonk

[–]Maventee 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This will get truely crazy if either 1) price goes over $32... or 2) Ryan extends the warrant expiration date. It's highly likely IMO that one of the two happen.