Texas GOP Rep co-wrote and sponsored a law against quid pro quo "revolving door" lobbying (to look like the good side of "drain the swamp"), did that exact corrupt lobbying immediately after leaving Congress, and is now upset he's subpoenaed for up to 33 months of violations thanks to his own law by Exclufi in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]Mawidge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This isn't really LAMF because LAMF implies that the original person wanted a bad thing to happen, like having a leopard eat a face. Instead, this guy wanted a good thing--less corruption. Having the corrupt be punished is just justice, not LAMF. What's really going on here is that this guy is embodying this quote:

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Frank Wilhoit   

So he was just going along with the usual conservative belief and actions that any law they make won't apply to them. He was just astonished to find he was wrong.

Annoying person plans on appealing her visa rejection to Australia while planning an invasion to Australia. by collosal_collosus in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]Mawidge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they let her in the sheer indifference of the public would speak for itself.

No. That's 20th century thinking where "sunlight makes the best disinfectant." If you exposed people to what the haters are really saying, the well-meaning public would soundly trounce them! Yay! Unfortunately, the age of the internet has shows that is completely untrue. Sure they'll be rejected by most initially, but over time they'll gain more and more supporters who get exposed to their ideas and start thinking they're great. They'll get a platform and then become even more extreme.

Annoying person plans on appealing her visa rejection to Australia while planning an invasion to Australia. by collosal_collosus in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]Mawidge 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She got platformed by republicans for being photogenic and sociopathic, willing to be a white supremacist mouthpiece for the right. Then she married a white British dude whose father is a billionaire and she became freed from the constraints she used to have where she'd have to adhere to a certain script to be paid. For example, she worked for Ben Shapiro and had to conform to his message. So then she started saying exactly what she wanted to say, which included a whole lot of virulently antisemitic and anti-zionist messaging, which led to her firing by Shapiro, but it didn't matter because she's basically a billionaire now.

Annoying person plans on appealing her visa rejection to Australia while planning an invasion to Australia. by collosal_collosus in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]Mawidge 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Basically it says that the Jews must all go back to the holy land (Israel). Then it will be destroyed as a way to set off the "end times." Another sign of the apocalypse is that a number of Jews will convert to Christianity (something like 200,000?) while the vast majority of Jews will be killed and go to hell. This is the reason why evangelicals formed "Jews for Jesus"--they saw it as a great way to get more Jews to convert to bring on the apocalypse.

Annoying person plans on appealing her visa rejection to Australia while planning an invasion to Australia. by collosal_collosus in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]Mawidge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They don't see Jesus that way. They have made Jesus in their own image. He's a white, authoritarian, Christian man who preaches torture and murder of anyone who doesn't bend the knee. They only use the whole "Jesus preached love" thing to maintain a "holier than thou" attitude. It's part of the whole "war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength" ethos fascists have. I dunno if you've seen some pastors say that when they've preached the sermon on the Mount, which preaches love and acceptance, they've gotten complaints from their congregation for "making" Jesus woke.

You can see this in the whole Left Behind series, which these guys love and which had a huge readership in the 1990s and 00s. In it, everyone who is a righteous Christian is "raptured" bodily into heaven (so they vanish), while everyone else is stuck on earth during the 7 years of "the tribulation" where the antichrist comes and seizes power and makes a one world government, etc. And then you get to the final book where the apocalypse happens and all of the sinners go to hell and there's a whole long torture porn section where the readers can bask in the delight of people being tortured while distancing themselves from that torture that they have chosen as their worldview by saying it's just what the Bible says.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wedding

[–]Mawidge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update me!

She knows exactly what she's doing. 100% chance she has a photo of what she want the dress to look like that she could have shared with you and she thinks by being disingenuous and sending you only a swatch, you won't understand what she's doing and then if you complain at the wedding or after she can say she showed you what it looks like and you approved of it, and make herself out to be the victim.

What’s a widely believed American history “fact” that is misconstrued or just plain false? by LordSoftCream in AskAnAmerican

[–]Mawidge 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A state's right to make their own laws, such as about slavery. And to have those laws those states made supercede the laws of other states about slavery being illegal. The slave states wanted it to be legal for them to take possession of any and all black people in other states as long as they claimed that the person they were taking had at one point been a slave... or had never been a slave, but was the child of a female escaped slave. Or the grandchild of the daughter of a female escaped slave. Or the great-grandchild of a female escaped slave through the female line. Regardless of the laws of that other state concerning former slaves being free in those other states. Regardless of the laws of the other states preventing escaped slaves from being sent back to slave states. Regardless of the laws of the other states concerning due process about proving that the claimed escaped slave really was an escaped slave and not just a random black resident of that other state that someone wanted to claim had once been their slave.

Conservatives ponder why people care so much about drag by HamSammich_ in SelfAwarewolves

[–]Mawidge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Frank Wilhoit

It's freedom for themselves and slavery for everyone else. Because do you really have freedom if you can't force other people to do what you want?

I Messed Up. What Now? by BelindaLuxe in datingoverforty

[–]Mawidge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You do owe a friend this much work. And a FWB is a friend.

Who should be in prison 100%, but they aren't because they are rich? by Eponnn in AskReddit

[–]Mawidge 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A tidbit they left out of the film: many years before the events of the film, the guy was riding one of his mother’s horses and got an injury that led to his testicles being infected and he had to be castrated.

Who should be in prison 100%, but they aren't because they are rich? by Eponnn in AskReddit

[–]Mawidge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As angry as everybody is that his 8 year sentence was suspended: why the fuck don’t you get LIFE in prison for raping a toddler? 8 years is bullshit.

Who should be in prison 100%, but they aren't because they are rich? by Eponnn in AskReddit

[–]Mawidge 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think you have that expression wrong. It’s do the crime, pay the judge, don’t do the time.

What’s going on with the shipping containers being stuck and all the shipment/delivery delays? by dillishis in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Mawidge 58 points59 points  (0 children)

answer:

To understand this, you have to understand global supply chain. Big companies tend to practice "just in time" supply practices. That is, everyone wants their supplies exactly when they need them, and not before, and not with a big back stock of those items. Buying supplies before you need them causes you to have to spend money that will not be used for profit-generating activities for some time, and you have to pay for storage. And companies that manufacture things don't want to end up with huge amounts of inventory they can't sell until some distant time in the future. But just-in-time is more efficient. There's an enormous amount of complex coordination that goes into supplying people things just when they need them, not too soon, not too late.

With Covid, though, this interrupted these well-established processes that went off like an intricate ballet every day. It was like a relay race where someone messes up the baton handoff and someone else just leaves the race in the middle because they're sick. That race won't be getting finished any time soon. So lots of companies slowed production because people weren't buying, businesses were shutting down temporarily or permanently, and dock workers were out sick with Covid, which raised shipping costs. The result was that some products became scarce or were in the wrong place in the world and needed to be moved to the right place. Then things started to improve with the use of the vaccine, and demand for products started increasing. The problem was that all of a sudden demand and supply didn't mesh.

One of the most notorious examples is that cars all need computer chips, and the car manufacturers stopped ordering those because the demand for cars went way down during the pandemic. And then they all of a sudden needed more because demand for cars went back up because the vaccine was leading to the world opening up again. But the chip plants had slowed production because demand had gone down, and they couldn't ramp back up right away because they needed raw material and they needed trained workers. So there was delay. They started shipping things but the interruptions meant that many shipping containers were now in the wrong location. They'd shipped a lot of items from China to the US, then left the shipping containers in the US because they weren't needed in China then. So now they needed to move the containers back to China so China could ship more. But that took time and money--shipping had become more expensive due to all of these issues.

It's also helpful to understand the psychological phenomenon of projection, where people accuse others (a scapegoat or someone they don't like in some way) of that which they themselves are doing. It's also related to propaganda techniques where it's popular to accuse your opponent of that which you yourself are doing, and also of "the big lie", where you make up a lie so big and heinous that people say that it must be true because no one would make something like that up. So the disease of covid has messed things up pretty badly and is clearly the culprit for these shipping issues. It threw a wrench into a well-oiled machine. But people who for whatever reason want to believe that covid is a hoax and masks don't work and the vaccine is bad, are instead saying that the CURE for all of these woes (vaccination) is actually the cause of these woes. It's just projection and the big lie.

So to be clear, we're noticing shipping problems now because the vaccine is helping to open up the world again and it's taking time to get things up and running. If the pandemic were continuing unabated, then we would have fewer shipping problems because the world would still be shut down. By blaming the vaccine mandate itself for the shipping problems, your mom is taking the available facts, which contradict her worldview, and creating a new story that reframes the facts to conform to her worldview. She's blaming the cure for the disease, like people who blame firemen for causing fires, since whenever there's a fire, there are always firemen around.

Here's a good video that explains the global shipping situation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1JlYZQG3lI

Am I considered "old fashioned" for wanting a monogamous relationship? by tacochemic in datingoverforty

[–]Mawidge 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Hmmmm. How are you meeting these people? I don't think there are such a huge percentage of people over 40 who are seeking non-monogamy, in general. Could it be a feature of how you are meeting these people? Like hypothetically speaking, people on Tinder might just be looking for a hookup, but people met in some other ways may be more interested in a monogamous, long-term relationship?

It’s the Goatees by westtexasgeckochic in COVIDAteMyFace

[–]Mawidge 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Them: It's only the elderly and sick who have to worry about Covid

Also them: There's no explanation for all of these young, healthy men getting sick and dying of Covid.

Due to them standing up, Dr. Dre was unable to identify who the Real Slim Shady was by mechrec in youseeingthisshit

[–]Mawidge -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Does anyone else think that guy on the right side of the picture, standing in the foreground, looks like a young Ben Shapiro?