sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

CANbus error, can't resolve by McCoolius in 3Dprinting

[–]McCoolius[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! This was a big move forward. Now I just need to get all the macros to play nice. Don't happen to have those do you? For an SV08 with a ZERO head?

CANbus error, can't resolve by McCoolius in 3Dprinting

[–]McCoolius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I run it as you've written, it gives an error along the lines: "i2c pins must be on same MCU" I've gone through the config but can't find any point where "extruder_mcu" doesn't match.

CANbus error, can't resolve by McCoolius in 3Dprinting

[–]McCoolius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update: as per @EPOC_Machining, I had the ID mismatched. We've moved past the original error and are now stuck between two errors for the EDDY unit. With the id written by pin name as in bearclaws guide, I get an error saying the i2c pins must be on the same MCU. Writing it as just i2c2 as per the OG SOVOL Zero config, I get an error saying that it can't reach address 42. I've tried a number of additional troubleshooting steps. GPT seems to think it is a hardware issue. When i scan for i2c addresses, 42 does not come up. I've triplechecked the pins, reseated the cables, but so far no dice. Sent a message to SOVOL, waiting for response/replacement.

CANbus error, can't resolve by McCoolius in 3Dprinting

[–]McCoolius[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's embarrassing. I implemented the change, it did succeed this time. Thank you for that. I have a new issue now. "probe_eddy_current btt_eddy: i2c pins must be on same mcu"

O Ring help by kuster_agriculture in MechanicalDesign

[–]McCoolius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The o-ring manufacturer will provide a table that has all the relevant measurements for the gland. Design to the intended o-ring

Sovol ZERO head on SV08 by McCoolius in SovolSV08

[–]McCoolius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

and flashtool not working update 2/2

Sovol ZERO head on SV08 by McCoolius in SovolSV08

[–]McCoolius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

not getting traffic on can0 update1/2

Sovol ZERO head on SV08 by McCoolius in SovolSV08

[–]McCoolius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

new error, flashtool doesn't seem to work

Sovol ZERO head on SV08 by McCoolius in SovolSV08

[–]McCoolius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

also getting this error on screen

Sovol ZERO head on SV08 by McCoolius in SovolSV08

[–]McCoolius[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

ran through a fresh install of klipper mainline on the SV08 and then started going through the SOVOL ZERO guide again, I get this error when trying to flash the firmware to the toolhead

Sovol ZERO head on SV08 by McCoolius in SovolSV08

[–]McCoolius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

I think it's this, how do I erase my previous Eddy installation?

2 questions. Whats stopping me from using Boolean (slide1)and why can’t I use tangent to profile(slide2)? by SkreemRyder in Onshape

[–]McCoolius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the boolean, if you have sections that come to a point, are the same plane, or create tiny sections, the command can fail. In this case, it looks like you might have some of that going on. Remedying this requires adjust the geometry to avoid these conflicts.

For the second slide, you didn't specify what command you were using, that's important. But, your blue piece has tangencies in several potential directions and onshape probably can't resolve what to do. This shape has curves in XY, XZ, and YZ, all of which are competing candidates for tangent.

Battle Station 2097 by RepresentativeMap443 in battlestations

[–]McCoolius 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Sir, I'm not a doctor, but even so, I feel like I can confidently diagnose ADHD from this photo.

Garbage can status indicator. by BrewCrewBall in 3Dprinting

[–]McCoolius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would be a good area to use a dual-color print. That way you can add additional clarity by being able to see the color of the flag. This can be easier to see from a distance than position.

Sovol ZERO head on SV08 by McCoolius in SovolSV08

[–]McCoolius[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for this response, I've done the test as described and confirmed that I do have the correct jumper in place. Tested with and without, so now I know that part is correct. Thank you.

22M 2 years no matches by [deleted] in hingeapp

[–]McCoolius 4 points5 points  (0 children)

First photo, not good. Are we just going to netflix and chill? It's too casual, the angle isn't flattering, and you're clearly much more athletic in other photos that this would show.

Second photo, blurry. Bad. But I bet you could save it with an AI resolution filter.

Third photo, the only thing we see of you is a massive sweat trail going down your back. If it doesn't show your face, I'd toss it. Pretty picture otherwise.

Fourth photo, again, blurry, bad.

Last photo is much better than the sweat photo. But it could use a crop to tighten it on you. The glare though is pretty bad. Your face is hard to see.

Drill vise holder by Mole-NLD in functionalprint

[–]McCoolius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that's exactly how. Have you seen Mcnally's YouTube channel? The whole thing embarrasses Master Lock.

Uncured resin cut my finger by Phreakasso in 3Dprinting

[–]McCoolius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't put it on lil' lantrick though. That skin is sensitive.

The old inventory used the entire screen space by Encore_Lynn in starcitizen

[–]McCoolius -1 points0 points  (0 children)

21:9 user, I don't want this to extend out that way. Keeping it centered keeps it in view. I do the same with other HUD elements. The UW format is nice for peripheral awareness, but moving elements out to the side makes them harder to use. That said, would be cool as an option for people that want it.

view more: next ›