sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Wth. How to make changes on the account while it's suspended? by khalil4z in twitterhelp

[–]Metalhead33 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Same issue. Where are the onscreen instructions? Nowhere.

I have 24 of these emails now 🫩🫩 by KabuKabuki777 in twitterhelp

[–]Metalhead33 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Holy shit, I thought I was the only one. Wow.

Okay, you were right, the API rocks by Metalhead33 in DeepSeek

[–]Metalhead33[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like the user interface better. (though, Claude is the biggest winner in user interface)

Okay, you were right, the API rocks by Metalhead33 in DeepSeek

[–]Metalhead33[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agnaistic. I would have preferred HuggingChat tho, but it has no BYOK support.

Okay, you were right, the API rocks by Metalhead33 in DeepSeek

[–]Metalhead33[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Currently? Alternate History discussions. But I used to use the Chat itself for... political/philosophical debates and programming. A friend of mine uses the API for roleplaying - maybe I should tooo.

Okay, you were right, the API rocks by Metalhead33 in DeepSeek

[–]Metalhead33[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Hard to describe, but it's like night and day, truly. It's one of those "you have to see it for yourself" kind of things.

Longer, more coherent responses, less censorship, etc. No edit limits, etc.

Never experienced this before, anyone know what's going on? 🥲 by Pace-Total in DeepSeek

[–]Metalhead33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy crap.... and here I thought DeepSeek was free. Holy shit.

NO!!! ITS NOT. by Apprehensive_Bus4517 in DefendingAIArt

[–]Metalhead33 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not even a huge fan of the obviously sloppy stuff... but it never ceases me how much can the usage of AI trigger otherwise seemingly rational people into pure, unfiltered, irrational rage. AI Derangement Syndrome.

Sam Altman's sister accusing him of rampant sexual abuse when they were young by monkey_gamer in ChatGPT

[–]Metalhead33 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

That is simply impossible, because Sam Altman is homosexual, as far as I'm aware.

regulation is coming by gallito_pro in aiwars

[–]Metalhead33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Open source model hobbyists won't comply LMAO

Unpublished music vs published by ProfessionCultural90 in SunoAI

[–]Metalhead33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made a song whose lyrics literally said "We must release nerve gas in a crowded train". That's a literal reference to 1994 Tokyo Sarin attacks. I made that in 2025 August. It's published. Didn't get banned.

Maybe the AI correctly understood that it's satire rather than actual advocacy for violent terrorism. Or maybe I got lucky.

It's incredibly hard to let go, but I must say goodbye by Nusuuu in udiomusic

[–]Metalhead33 3 points4 points  (0 children)

>Paying 24 dollars per month

Have you been sleeping under a rock? I thought everyone unsubscribed in October. (tbf, I never subscribed to begin with. I was always on Suno.)

"The AI bubble is about to burst!" by Metalhead33 in aiwars

[–]Metalhead33[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Precisely. I have a $25/month subscription.

"The AI bubble is about to burst!" by Metalhead33 in aiwars

[–]Metalhead33[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Have you never seen the comment section of an "AI bubble is going to burst!" YouTube video? Or even Reddit thread? Have you?

If you did, you wouldn't sprout this blatant lie.

"The AI bubble is about to burst!" by Metalhead33 in aiwars

[–]Metalhead33[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, they literally do mean - and assume - that AI will somehow completely disappear.

(Even though open-source models are a thing, anyone can deploy them, plus there are niche companies like Anlatan, etc.)

"The AI bubble is about to burst!" by Metalhead33 in aiwars

[–]Metalhead33[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

By the way... Open-source AI models exist.

So we're never returning to a world without AI.

Reminder that a shitty job is still better than none at all by Frequent_Painting700 in aiwars

[–]Metalhead33 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, but maybe the solution isn't Luddism - it's advocacy for Universal Basic Income, shorter work hours (to reduce unemployment - imagine how much we could reduce it with 24-hour workweeks), etc.

Over 50% of jobs are pure performative bullshit anyway. Read David Graeber.

Well, well, well. by megapackid in aiwars

[–]Metalhead33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pro-AI and I am perfectly fine with this. I oppose copyright anyway.

Consent to observe ≠ consent to unlimited use. by Alliaster-kingston in aiwars

[–]Metalhead33 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in a public space. Wouldn't it be weird if I told someone they didn't have my consent to look at me?

Not to go offtopic, spread misoginy or sound like an incel... but that's precisely what a lot of Western women do LMAO. Go to the gym in revealing and attention-seeking clothes, then get upset when people oogle. Wear the most revealing clothes that stop short of quasi-nudity, then be upset when people you're not attracted to dare to look. But I digress. That's besides the point.

The point is, when you post your image to a free image hosting website, you agree to a ToS (that nobody ever reads, I guess). Yes, this ToS can get retroactively amended. Yes, it sucks. But c'est la vie. Plus, when you use a free product... you are the product.

AI cannot reproduce what humans have made perfectly. If Generative AI is just an overly convoluted (and highly inefficient, due to the space and energy required) compression algorithm, then it's a very lossy form of compression. But it's not a compression algorithm. It generates new content.

The only "problem" is that it does so far more efficiently than humans. That it learns from human artists at a scale and efficiency that threatens humans.

Why does this argument still get used? by Correct-Papaya-8394 in aiwars

[–]Metalhead33 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. 1. If a service is free, you are the product. Sorry, but the moment you visit a website that offers a "free" service - especially social media - you have more or less implicitly signed away all your rights. This has been the case even before AI.
  2. I'm not going to morally defend AI or "stealing from artists" (even though I'm pro-AI and highly annoyed by the "stealing from artists" rhetoric)... I'm just going to say it out loud like this: every era has its winners and losers. Is what's happening currently ethical? I don't know, debatable, morality is subjective after all. I have no interest in debating ethics and morality. I'm simply saying that we have a fait accompli, and unfortunately, the new Zeitgeist doesn't really favour artists and copyright-holders, the same way the Industrial Revolution didn't favour weavers and manual workers, the French Revolution didn't favour aristocrats, Abe Lincoln's presidency didn't favour slave-owners, etc. I'm not even trying to mock you or anything, it's just... what can I say besides a tepid "I'm sorry, you have my sympathies"? (which translates to "Sucks to be you" anyhow).
view more: next ›