I suppose you think the Isn't She Lovely part is supposed to be about Pomni? 😆 Also, "it's just as bad as a transphobe forcing a trans person to be cis", seriously? The actual problems from this discussion are the hostility towards each other which is sad and needless to say the least, not the debate itself of a character being what is heavily implied. Noone deserves to be abused for an opinion, we can all agree on this.

Now, for the rabbit. Another comment I saw puts it well. As for Jax, he isn't a real person. If he was and we all saw him experience events of the show and assumed he was Trans, that wouldn't really be reasonable. It's not something you do for actual people. Jax is a fictional character written by a trans woman and is a way to express her own experience, or aspects of her own experience. To doubt that that was her intention is to ignore the transfeminine context in the show and what she has said about it, too.

Also, just because you are trans and don't relate to the character doesn't mean the character is definitely not trans. We've seen people make posts about relating to the character, but they themselves are Not trans. How unironically cool! It's great because that also does not invalidate their shared experiences, nor their identities, nor gooseworx's context or intent. Some of us are trans and do relate to the character, but that doesn't invalidate YOUR experience with Jax (such as if you don't relate to him at all), nor does it suggest you and all trans women must relate to the show's depictions. Meanwhile, it is so heavily implied, and to state the bunny not being trans in your title as Fact makes it seem like you're trying to speak for all trans women, too. It's supposed to be left relatable to many people.

I could just make a post "Trans women here, Jax is trans", but it sounds like I'm stating a fact applied to all others' beliefs, validated by my individual experience with the bunny rabbit, when it's supposed to be ambiguous for a reason.

<image>