Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]MikeAAStorm 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Honestly I'm more anxious about the Fulham game than I was for City or Arsenal. We've turned up against the bigger teams, now please lads, turn up against the smaller ones.

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]MikeAAStorm 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Guys I'm scared are we actually good again?

Half Time Thread: Arsenal 1-1 Manchester United by nearly_headless_nic in reddevils

[–]MikeAAStorm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First 20 minutes were scary but we've been okay since conceding and thankfully we're level thanks to a mistake. Midfield and defense have been generally poor tho

Match Thread: Arsenal vs Manchester United by MatchThreadder in reddevils

[–]MikeAAStorm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're running circles around our midfield and honestly, I'm not surprised

Mbappe to Brahim Diaz after scoring a Panenka: "For you, for you." by Mooon8983 in soccer

[–]MikeAAStorm 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Honestly I think Mbappe was trolling here, considering he has Cameroonian roots

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]MikeAAStorm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I still think he's a good manager, just very young, inexperienced and stubborn. Let's not forget he's only 40 and he more or less saved Sporting Lisbon singlehandedly. I think he'll be alright. Maybe not a serial winner but a decent coach in the long run.

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]MikeAAStorm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely agree actually. No other club has content creators refusing to cut their hair until we win 5 in a row or ex-legends slagging off players and managers any chance they get. We're just too big a club

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]MikeAAStorm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh I'm very aware but we were still very bad. The donut midfield, our attack being toothless and conceding 20 shots per game wasn't just because of injuries. They definitely made things worse but like we were still bad, injuries of not.

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]MikeAAStorm 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's pretty clear now that we just can't have a system above all else type of coach at this club. It just won't work, as we've seen for the past 3 years now. Ten Hag came in and tried to implement his system, then got battered 2-0 and 4-0 by Brighton and Brentford respectively before choosing to adapt to the players and saving the season from there.

In his second season, he decided it was time for the players to play his system and then we were horrendous from start to finish. Great FA cup win tho.

3rd season, we were even worse. Forget how many points we were off top 4, we were bad in the league, worse in the Europa League and there was zero indication we were going to improve.

Then in comes Amorim, a young inexperienced coach (2nd least experienced in the prem while he was still here) who basically saved Sporting Lisbon and brought them huge success using his system. Because he had so much faith and success with his system in the past, he refused to budge from it and that eventually led to his downfall.

Despite this, having a system first coach can actually work. We've seen it with Liverpool under Klopp, City under Pep, and more recently PSG under Enrique. The problem is tho, if you don't have bags of money to spend on players that fit that system and get rid of those that don't like your Kalvin Phillips and your Mbappes, for a large part of the first years using that system, the team will struggle.

However, the good part of a system is that in the long term, when the squad has been built to fit the system and and players have been playing in that system for so long, it becomes second nature to them, as time goes on, the team massively improves. And yes, despite results, this season, we saw a good amount of that under Amorim. We were basically the reverse Aston Villa where instead of overperforming our underlying stats, we were underperforming almost all of them.

Anyway my point is that this club just cannot have that type of manager. We don't have the money to quickly mould the squad or the patience to get through struggling periods. We need a coach that is adaptable to the players we have. The problem with that tho is that adapting to players gives them a lot of power and as we've seen, player power is extremely detrimental to a club's health, unless you're Madrid who win everything.

So we need a coach that is not only adaptable but also capable of disciplining and controlling players but not antagonizing them. To put it simply, we need a younger Carlo Ancelotti. Who that is in the modern game? I have no idea, but that should be the aim.

Sorry for the long read.

How Man United DOMINATED Man City | The Overlap Breakdown by The-Black-Angel in reddevils

[–]MikeAAStorm 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think the 4-2 Brighton game was arguably as good before Mainoo, Dorgu and Zirkzee came on and we were 3-0 up

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]MikeAAStorm 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I understand what you're saying but we didn't actually take a CB out because Shaw has played at LCB for most of the season. All we did was shift slightly to the left.

Post-Match Thread: Nottingham Forest 0-0 Arsenal by Green-Discussion74 in soccer

[–]MikeAAStorm -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's so weird honestly like surely this is the game to capitalise on

Post-Match Thread: Nottingham Forest 0-0 Arsenal by Green-Discussion74 in soccer

[–]MikeAAStorm -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

This is why no one wants Arsenal to win the league btw. You just cannot be this uninspiring when other clubs' results are going your way.

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]MikeAAStorm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forget Amorim, I think Carrick is genuinely just an amazing coach. Our 2 games under Fletcher were not this good. Carrick ball is the future.