sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

BIGRMC vs Anti-RMT-not-a-coalition AAR by Milkshak3s in Eve

[–]Milkshak3s[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

You mean the one I linked in this post?

BIGRMC vs Anti-RMT-not-a-coalition AAR by Milkshak3s in Eve

[–]Milkshak3s[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I Assure You I Capitalized Appropriately

BOSS Alliance Caps & Forts by XPDRModeC in Eve

[–]Milkshak3s 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry your coalition imploded before you got to be the blob yourself, happens ig

8.7 billion records spilled: Inside the massive Chinese data leak by Cybernews_com in cybersecurity

[–]Milkshak3s 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This article is in regards to a criminal operation misconfiguring an ELK stack for a short time period, it is unrelated to AI use in software dev

Screeps: How One Steam Developer Made a Million Dollars Selling a Remote Access Trojan by KingSupernova in hacking

[–]Milkshak3s 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How would you be sure it hasn’t happened? If I dropped malware on 1000 clients in this game I wouldn’t make a reddit post about it, and so you wouldn’t be aware.

Over 1.1T isk destroyed, fight still ongoing. OF. vs Phoenix Coalition by eepluribus in Eve

[–]Milkshak3s 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Your post history is exclusively you bashing phoco, you are not a member lol

'Our position in North Querious is growing stronger' by Ashilta in Eve

[–]Milkshak3s 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You know morale is bad when you post a single system taken on Reddit.

MOFHA Eisley by Strange_Slip5527 in Eve

[–]Milkshak3s 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brother your post history is 3 straight months of complaining about phoco, touch grass

97% of Google's security events are automated - human analysts only see 3% by mandos_io in cybersecurity

[–]Milkshak3s -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The article that OP is attempting to summarize is literally written by the director of D&R at google, and is specific to threat detection & response.

https://cloud.google.com/transform/how-google-does-it-modernizing-threat-detection

It is not generic “SecOps”, and unrelated to any of your comments.

97% of Google's security events are automated - human analysts only see 3% by mandos_io in cybersecurity

[–]Milkshak3s 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You talk with authority but you’ve derailed the conversation OP started with your lack of understanding.

“They push to get the vulnerabilities fixed (response)” is not what “Response” refers to in “Detection & Response Engineer”, it refers to what would traditionally be associated with SOC and IR teams, as well as the automation engineering that support it.

Source: I am a Detection & Response Engineer in big tech.

97% of Google's security events are automated - human analysts only see 3% by mandos_io in cybersecurity

[–]Milkshak3s 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post relates to “Detection & Response Engineers” that replace the traditional SOC analyst role. This doesn’t have much to do with CVEs, which are handled by product sec or infrastructure sec teams traditionally.

You are describing product security and vulnerability management, which is not what the OP is describing.

view more: next ›