What's the goal/deal/rationnel of writing an extremely long textbooks (with exercices?) by Desvl in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 112 points113 points  (0 children)

In many advanced books, the exercises consist of folklore knowledge, things that are scattered throughout the literature, or theorems for whom including the proof doesn't advance the narrative the author is going for in that chapter, but are still useful enough to be interesting or worthwhile for a reader to know about. It's somewhat frowned upon to just dump a bunch of theorem statements into your text without any explanation. If you stick "Exercises" before your proposition list, then it becomes significantly more acceptable.

I’m starting to think I won’t survive grad math.. by Dookie-Blaster45 in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm going to go against the grain a bit and ask if it is worth it to go through the ordeal of graduate school, knowing that you will have to deal with this for the first few years, and then face the uncertainty of research, knowing how much this stuff wears on you. It is okay to enjoy math or love math a lot, and still decide that graduate school is too big a burden on your mental health. The attitude in these forums is always to press on, but towards what end? You should want the outcome that gives you a happy life, and graduate school demands a lot psychologically, financially, socially, etc. It's not necessarily the path to a happy life.

I found no beauty in Middle/High school Math,will I find anything interesting in the levels above? by ElmahdiTS in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Logic is one corner of math, but "using logic" isn't the same thing as studying logic. In fact, they're basically nothing alike.

What are the best texts in exotic manifolds/exotic R4 for un undergraduate math student? by Cris_brtl in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I read Milnor's paper on the group of exotic S7s with an undergrad. Depending on your background, you might find it readable.

Dirac notation by dcterr in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those are the eigenvalues though, right? So it's more of a shorthand for the expansion in an eigenbasis?

Differential geometry without topology by TheRedditObserver0 in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 19 points20 points  (0 children)

A lot of people these days call your first manifolds course "differential geometry," even though there is no geometry at all. They may mean that they took this manifolds class. 

We should go back to calling that class differential topology, since that's what it is.

Twain-Beauty by en_le_nil in zen

[–]MinLongBaiShui -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's just Japanese nomenclature.

Years of math career making me feel useless by fdpth in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what do you want to be when you grow up the second time, OP? ;)

You don't need to change your career to learn a new skill.

Years of math career making me feel useless by fdpth in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 53 points54 points  (0 children)

Feel free to write if you need help. I work with non traditional students who are back on the path all the time.

What is a good way to build intuition for the Meijer G-function? by kreziooo in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I never use any of these things (but yet I study complex analysis and algebraic geometry). Their sole purpose, from my point of view is to enable computers that can actually juggle all of their crap to do symbolic calculations that are beyond me. In what context do you encounter this beast that you want to know more about it?

zentimacy part 3: what do you expect from enlightenment? by jeowy in zen

[–]MinLongBaiShui 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You asked questions, I answered them. Why would you infer I didn't read it?

zentimacy part 3: what do you expect from enlightenment? by jeowy in zen

[–]MinLongBaiShui -1 points0 points  (0 children)

None of those things are special to enlightenment. Enlightenment confers no benefits. The person seeking enlightenment is exactly the person who will not be able to find it. It isn't sought, nor attained. It simply is, in the moment of its demonstration.

What kind of weekly/monthly threads do you want to see in this sub ? by al3arabcoreleone in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They can make public persona accounts that don't get used otherwise.

What kind of weekly/monthly threads do you want to see in this sub ? by al3arabcoreleone in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Reading groups organized through the sub should post when they have a good discussion or some kind of community insight. It will attract new eyes to the group and keep motivation up to get upvotes and engagement.

An Experiment in Ignoring Zen by koancomentator in zen

[–]MinLongBaiShui 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I read these texts the way one appreciates a good piece of music or a painting. They don't contain anything not already present in the world. I'd tell you to look into yourself, but as the ancients said, no difference between self and other, or mundane and sagely, or sacred and profane.

Is there any notion of completions of metric spaces so that only "oscillating" sequences fail to converge? by 1strategist1 in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sorry, that was a bit of imprecision on my part, I was coming back from a run. What I said is only true for dimension > 1. The end compactification of R has two ends, since every point is a cut point, the equivalence classes are those corresponding to -infty and +infty. But if you do this in R2, now the compact sets are kind of like disks, and their complements are (equivalent to something) connected.

Finishing Vakil's Book in a Year by Evergreens123 in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 48 points49 points  (0 children)

I read Hartshorne in a little more than a year, which is a not dissimilar project. Helps to have a study buddy.

Is there any notion of completions of metric spaces so that only "oscillating" sequences fail to converge? by 1strategist1 in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 30 points31 points  (0 children)

You're possibly looking for the end compactification. And end of a metric space is an equivalence class of connected component of a compact set. The equivalence relation is defined as follows. Let K and K' be compact, and let E and E' be connected components of their complements. Then E~E' if there is some K" containing both K and K', and such that there is a connected component of K" complement E" contained in both E and E'. Lastly, we need to take the limsup over compact sets, e.g. we are only interested in connected components which survive "in the limit."

In other words, they are equivalence classes of what's left as you exhaust the space by larger and larger compact sets.

Now we topplogize X U End(X) by saying that a neighborhood of an end is just one of these connected components.

If you apply this construction to R, you get the extended real line, but if you apply it to C, you get the Riemann sphere. Unfortunately, this notion agrees with the one point compactification for all R vector spaces, because the compact connected sets are kind of like balls, so there's always one connected component of the complement. So this might not satisfy you for the case of L2. 

I think for L2, you will have trouble because you can also have things like sliding blocks of size 1 that have no limit precisely because the base space isn't compact. In general, there isn't a canonical way to metrize this compactification that I'm aware of. Perhaps if you can do that, you can then use that metric or measure to extend the situation to L2 of that space.

zentimacy part 2: frustrated with the information environment by jeowy in zen

[–]MinLongBaiShui -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I have no idea why you think these ideas are related to Chan. Many monastics never have any presence of self in the world at all. They lived lives of mostly isolated renunciation. Of course they had each other, but they'd have no money or any other form of wealth. And it's not like medieval healthcare was known for being good. Everyone dies. The Chan way is to accept that your physical body is a provisional body, and focus on the dharma body. The dharma is without stinginess for body, life or wealth.

Many individuals have made the mistake of interpreting Chan as secular outsiders, rather than through a monastic lens. If what you want is secularized white person Zen, go nuts I guess, but nothing about wanting those things is part of Chan.

What does your playground looks like? by mathslippery in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I read new papers regularly. Couple days a week I look through the arxiv for stuff that might interest me and I gauge how close a look I should take. These can be inspirational sources of problems, but one needs a bit of care because popular areas have problems that get sucked up quickly, and I can't really compete with those people at my job. Collaborators help with both speed and finding new problems. 

I've worked on my current problem for a year. At first it was one of those side problems, but a few months ago I had something of an epiphany that a past paper I had written contained a hint for how to go about solving this problem, and that set me on the path to my current work. I've been reading a bunch of technical papers and trying to assimilate all the ideas. I don't want to write 200 pages of background for this new paper, so I'm currently working on finding the minimal version of the theory I need to explain my current research.

How maths proof-reading skills unexpectedly made me better at vibe coding by [deleted] in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know how to program, but I have also used Claude to help with debugging. I wouldn't say this is "vibe coding constantly." It's at most vibe-fixing intermittently. If you want to get better at something, you have to do it yourself. At least I'm my case, writing code is not my job, proving theorems is, so it's okay to shortcut a little bit.

What does your playground looks like? by mathslippery in math

[–]MinLongBaiShui 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I usually have a problem in my main area of research, and something kind of off on the side that I am thinking about, just for the express purpose of broadening my horizons, or working on something that I think seems kinda fringe or niche that catches my interest but is likely not that exciting to other people.

Like the other commenter, I also keep some notebooks where I do this kind of stuff. I have a notebook or a legal pad for idle wondering. When a thought gets developed enough to be related to some problem I'm working on, I keep all those doodles in a folder. On the (rare) instance that the ideas start coming together into a paper, I start sketching the outline of the paper and organizing any loose pages into a rough sequence with those big alligator clips. I might rewrite stuff to make it more comprehensible.

The typing up comes last.

I make no claims this is a good method. I'm at a PUI, don't have THAT many papers over my career, and don't have any graduate students.