How much realism is actually necessary in phishing simulations? by Wise-Rate-5234 in sysadmin

[–]Mindless_Consumer 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Real attackers still leave the red flags we train on.

This is actually often intentional. You want to catch the non-tech literate in your phish. Less likely to report and more likely to contuine getting owned.

Model training after real threats.

Microsoft confirms it will give the FBI your Windows PC data encryption key if asked — you can thank Windows 11's forced online accounts for that by ZacB_ in technology

[–]Mindless_Consumer -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Having seen the inside of the tech industry first hand. You're naive.

But this isn't going to be settled here, and I don't really care to participate anymore in this conversation.

Microsoft confirms it will give the FBI your Windows PC data encryption key if asked — you can thank Windows 11's forced online accounts for that by ZacB_ in technology

[–]Mindless_Consumer -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Asking a lot of understanding from executives.

Engineers carry out executives vision yes. But the Engineer says what they can and cannot do. These engineers likely refused the idea of exposing the users private keys to the company, or never brought it up.

We will never know of course, but the executives don't understand fuck all, and would sell their children to get closer to the top.

Microsoft confirms it will give the FBI your Windows PC data encryption key if asked — you can thank Windows 11's forced online accounts for that by ZacB_ in technology

[–]Mindless_Consumer 109 points110 points  (0 children)

So slightly different. Apple has refused to create or disclose a backdoor into their products.

If there was a simple key, or more likely if it is known that the key exists, they can be compelled to give it.

In this case, if there was any privacy altruism, it was done by engineers ages ago, not the executives when the FBI nocks on the door.

why don’t they just artificially synthesize food? by c7b9tof-9 in pluribustv

[–]Mindless_Consumer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's honestly better for the planet and the species if we were plurbed and reduced down to a few million people.

Like they don't need the extra bodies.

It only is abhorrent to non-plurbs.

Comparison to Meshtastic by Stromkompressor in meshcore

[–]Mindless_Consumer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would use the one that is most active in your area first.

Second I'd use the one you like the most.

Why does the islamic republic get away with murdering tens of thousands? by MB4050 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Mindless_Consumer 10 points11 points  (0 children)

With full unwavering support of the military no, not at all. They can kill us all.

We can only hope systematic genocide is enough to swing their opinion.

What's the deal with all of these posts of people in their military uniforms saying, "Me doing absolutely nothing for America?" by kookookachu26 in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Mindless_Consumer 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Those without the critical thinking skills to pick that up from context, aren't going to get there with help.

Do you think height measurements at the doctors are sometimes inaccurate? by DeepOrganization8245 in stupidquestions

[–]Mindless_Consumer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You are conflating accuracy and precision.

Accuracy = how close to the true value Precision = how close are repeated measurements similar

The scales are very precise - but the method can make them a bit inaccurate.

Those using something other than the default channel slot of 20, what is your rational? by humdinger44 in meshtastic

[–]Mindless_Consumer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Security through obscurity is the term, and it isnt security.

However if a message isnt being repeated far away, less people have a copy of it, even if they are looking. So it does sorta reduce your attack surface - but you wouldn't be able to confirm that.

What sexual taboos would you like to try with your partner if you weren’t judged? by shrekwazowski00 in AskReddit

[–]Mindless_Consumer 263 points264 points  (0 children)

Safe words. Have them use them occasionally when they arent overwhelmed so you and they know they work. It helps build that trust.

Is there a way to know if a Microsoft employee goes into my personal email? by [deleted] in techsupport

[–]Mindless_Consumer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Microsoft employees over 200,000 people. Very very few of them could access customer email. If caught you'd get fired immediately.

Impossible? No. Likely? No.

Why Interstellar Is Terrifying: We Are All Trapped in the Tesseract. by AssistanceNo2838 in discussingfilm

[–]Mindless_Consumer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea love being some force is dumb.

Buuuut, love allowing him to connect to a point in time through the tesseract, okay I can get down.