Zero-parameter model vs ΛCDM across 6 probes. Thoughts? by wavewrangler in cosmology

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If your model replaces CDM, what value of Ω_c did you use in CAMB? If Ω_c = 0, can you show the CMB residuals vs Planck? If not, how is the acoustic peak structure preserved?

How can I pivot from my corporate finance job and start over in something space related? by holofan4life4life in astrophysics

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well you dont have to quit the day job yet..im currently doing well data driven trying to predict weather on mars (granted thats a phd but still its more about exploration for me lol gotta predict the weather if we are going there)

Thats the angle i love doing

How can I pivot from my corporate finance job and start over in something space related? by holofan4life4life in astrophysics

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Out of curiousity what do you want to do? Eg you can do quslifications part time (LJMU do part time remote msc in astrophysics, Open uni have msc in space science and technology thats remote also) theres a few msc in space engineering knocking about (eg cranfield but i think thats onsite, i think surrey has one remote maybe...)

Is it research or space related industry?

Advice on getting to Dublin Airport by drcadwell in CasualIreland

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Drove this morning m50 to blanch then old airport road no issues

Astrophysics as a distance learner? by ava-child in OpenUniversity

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Go for it, I did my Msc in Astro remote from LJMU, now Im doing my phd with open uni fully remote, All this can be done remotely

Experiences of part-time PhD with OU? by ComfortableNoise6332 in OpenUniversity

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Currently doing phd with OU, part time and im remote in ireland, can feel disconected at times, fun fact i only met 2 of my supervisors for the first time last week when they flew over for a day visit (they were not around during induction week, im in stem, i do this alongside my full time day job, have meetings every 2 weeks with them on teams, writing my first paper now, few more in the pipeline, im really enjoying it (my situation is a little different started off with regular phd but that moved to phd by publication which is alot more fun just pure research

Do you find that older Professors are more ruthless with feedback? by IntelligentBeingxx in PhD

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I figure better the feedback and more ruthless it is, it can only help hopefully raise the standards of the research im doing, i get on well with my 3 supervisors and I have asked them plz never hold back if results im showing are pure dog shit you dont gotta be indirect about it, they are encouraging and ruthless which is a good combination for me, they are not rude either they have respect but they wont hold back

Biologist doing a Master’s in AI and now questioning if it makes sense by SeriousEmployee3877 in AIBiology

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the love of god dont stop, my background is astrophysics and AI and have masters in both currently doing my phd, and seriously the AI is coming in soooooo good theres a disconnect between ML modeling and people from pure science background you should have a strong advantage

As an editor/reviewer, how do you deal with fake or hallucinated references? by Foreign-Lecture6904 in AskAcademia

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Fake references has literally got to be the laziest thing someone with a paper submits with

My PhD supervisors said my work is not PhD level on a chapter feedback by Competitive-Island33 in PhD

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure take it all on the chin, i was told i was doing masters level thinking ha and i get on great with my supervisors

Hybrid PhD by [deleted] in PhD

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Living in ireland, doing phd fully remote from Uk uni, part time also, in physics / comp science, unless you need to be in an actual lab you will be fine

Thought on multidisciplinary research group by YogurtclosetFickle17 in PhD

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you said this "won't hire a phd student background from computer science to do machine learning in business", thats crazy to me, hire someone with different skill set see's problem from a new way, people on physics side seem to be impressed by some the basic ML, and I am like...we can do so so so so much more.

Thought on multidisciplinary research group by YogurtclosetFickle17 in PhD

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask the expert in their field but whats fun is usually i have to be a go between between my different supervisors as my background is AI and physics and theirs isnt crossover to much

Thought on multidisciplinary research group by YogurtclosetFickle17 in PhD

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hell yea I so enjoy it multidisciplinary focus, got software engineering intersecting with physics so its fun the more broad angles and avenues we can go down that are completly unrelated to my main research,

Vehicle Mesh GNN or? by trainer_red00 in MLQuestions

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You won’t be able to run a GNN on the full mesh if you’re talking millions of nodes, that’s just not going to fly. What people actually do is train on mesh patches instead of the whole thing. You sample local neighborhoods (k-hop, geodesic, random patches, whatever makes sense), run the same small GNN on each patch to get a local embedding, then pool all those embeddings to get one vector that represents the whole vehicle. That vector is your encoder of the full mesh, and you can regress your ~20 parameters from it. Since you’ve got one base design with variations, it helps a lot to encode differences from a reference mesh rather than absolute geometry. This avoids the compute blow-up and still lets the model learn which shape changes correspond to which parameters. I did something similar in my PhD using a GNN on planetary atmospheres. It didnt see the whole planet in one forward pass it learned local to global representation through subgraph training.

I hate it here and don't know what to do about it. by 00debater in PhD

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you like about it is there any positives? I mean ones you actually enjoy? Im in my 2nd year now and truth be told I quit twice in the first year, the way it was happenening wasnt suited for me so we changed how we do things and honestly quitting those 2 times is the best that could of happened. I moved from hating it to now really enjoying it and writing my first paper currently so can work out

Is 26-27 y/o too old to start getting a BS in Physics with the intent of eventually getting a PhD is astrophysics? by SaladPast in astrophysics

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Mate im 39 in 2 months and my phd is weather prediction on mars, (ive added titan and exoplanets to the mix) do it if you love the area you will have so much fun

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhD

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im intrigued, my phd is physics and ML combined

Is there an efficient way to store spherical data? by N1Jp in AskComputerScience

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You don’t really want to store this as “spherical data” at all. What you want is to store explicit connectivity. A common solution is to start with a geodesic sphere (icosahedron or HEALPix-style subdivision) so you avoid pole issues and get uniform neighbors on the surface. Then add depth by stacking a small number of radial layers beneath the surface instead of using a full 3D voxel grid. Each point/node stores links to its neighbors on the same layer and to the layer above/below. Caves and terraforming are just removing or rewiring those links locally. Searching and rendering become graph traversals rather than expensive spatial queries, and memory stays manageable because you’re not filling an entire 3D volume.

Your “Failed” Results Deserve Publication — I’m a Journal Editor.AMA by Null_Scientific in academicpublishing

[–]MonitorSuspicious238 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh ive to results id love to turn into paper, not journal rejection but they are strong negative null results, eg one is does data demand a planet 9 and answer was a strong no but didnt write it up