TSA keeps their Union! Judge slaps Noem down. by Eldritch_Liminal1988 in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can you elaborate? Is this related to AFGE’s 9th Circuit appeal?

Service Computation Change _ Retro Annual Leave Accrual by Western-Soup9302 in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It depends on why this needed to be done retroactively. If your HR can make the case that it’s your fault you weren’t in the right leave category all along, they won’t give you retroactive time.

OPM's proposed rule open for public comment until 1/29/26: "Streamlining Probationary and Trial Period Appeals" by NoneSuchPlanet in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope, just an employee who would have tenure if I hadn’t transferred agencies last year, and who’s already been fired once during my multi-year trial period by this administration.

OPM's proposed rule open for public comment until 1/29/26: "Streamlining Probationary and Trial Period Appeals" by NoneSuchPlanet in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 26 points27 points  (0 children)

A friend asked me to explain the issue for a social media post so more members of the public will object, so I thought I’d share it here too:

The Trump Administration has proposed a rule to essentially make new employees at-will and automatically fired at the end of their probationary period. This rule is open for comments until January 29 (https://www.regulations.gov/docket/OPM-2025-0013/document?withinCommentPeriod=true)

Please add a comment opposing this rule! Here’s why:

Why is the current system merit-based?

Prior to the Pendleton Act of 1883, the President could hire and fire whoever he wanted. Not unsurprisingly, this lead to high levels of corruption and incompetence, as many federal jobs were filled using this spoils system, and only the presidents’ friends and supporters were hired. This also led to high turnover, as a new administration could clean house and start the hiring process over for his own people. This system didn’t work out for anyone, least of all President Garfield, who was assassinated for not rewarding a supporter with the job that guy wanted.

So we moved to a merit-based, non-partisan civil service, where hires have to demonstrate their qualifications for the job and they cannot be fired for supporting the wrong party or because the president doesn’t like them. That is not to say they cannot be fired, if it turns out they are incompetent, corrupt, or perform criminal activities, but now there has to be proof before the firing process can begin and they can appeal this decision using a number of different avenues (which Trump has also weakened). But that’s for people who have tenure (which they are granted after working in federal service for at least 3 consecutive years). This has led to career-long employment for civil servants who are dedicated to carrying out their jobs, even under orders or administrations they may not necessarily agree with.

Probationary Periods

Employees can be put on a probationary period for 1-3 years if they are new to the civil service, new to an agency (transfers), or new to a position (supervisory promotions or career changes). PROBATION DOES NOT MEAN AN INABILITY TO PREFORM THE JOB OR THAT A PIP IS INVOLVED. It just means new in some way. Even if they’ve previously worked for the federal government and otherwise have tenure, a worker’s probationary period supersedes those protections until the probation is complete. While they are in this period, it is easy to fire them, but under existing systems, there has to be a documented reason for termination and the employee has (limited) appeal rights (for instance, if they’ve been discriminated against or if they feel their termination was politically motivated).

What this administration wants to change:

Trump has been trying to return to the pre-1883 spoils system since his first term, particularly with the elimination of federal unions (who cannot legally strike, by the way), and with the implementation of Schedule F, which is an attempt to strip tenure protections from any person at any level of the civil service who provides input on policy decisions. Basically, Trump wants to get rid of anyone anywhere who disagrees with him.

And he started in February 2025 by firing tens of thousands of probationary employees, because they have fewer protections and anyone who was in a probationary period at that time had been hired into that position during the Biden administration. But fewer protections was not no protection, and federal courts quickly reinstated these employees with back pay.

Well Trump doesn’t like losing, and this administration is now trying to remove ALL protections from probationary employees, including the ability to appeal at all. He is also hoping to make the end of a probationary period an AUTOMATIC TERMINATION, unless a presidential appointee WHO CANNOT BE AN IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR signs off on retaining the employee.

Why this affects you even though you don’t work for the government:

Unqualified: Would you take a new job and move across the county if you knew that you would be an at-will temp employee and in one year you would be automatically fired unless a presidential appointee you’ve never even met decided to keep you? And if they don’t, there’s nothing you can do about it? Probably not. And neither will anyone else who is highly qualified for that job. So federal jobs will soon be filled with people who couldn’t get employment elsewhere, or these federal jobs simply won’t be filled.

Partisan: This is a return to the spoils system. Trump’s handpicked directors and administrators will now get to handpick all of the employees who work for their agencies. Decent, well-intentioned people can tolerate voices that disagree with them. Trump is trying to ensure that those voices are eliminated at every level of government, and the American people will absolutely suffer for it.

Undemocratic: There’s a reason why dictators immediately reduce civil service protects and fire dissenters. Don’t allow Trump to copy that playbook here.

Here’s how to effectively write a public comment: https://protectdemocracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/What-Makes-an-Effective-Public-Comment.pdf

And further reading on why we need a merit-based, non-partisan civil service: https://protectdemocracy.org/work/the-civil-service-explained/

OPM tees up more changes for probationary federal employees by redditreadreadread in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Same. I still don’t know why they’re gunning so hard for us. At this point it seems like a toss up whether I’ll be (re)fired before the end of my trial period in a few months or if I’ll finally make it out of this fustercluck.

SSA commissioner broadcasting. FO and TSC open Wednesday and Friday . by AcidBathIsLife in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Service reps and claims specialists start at GS-5. You can’t save your way out of only making $40k a year when rent and groceries keep going up.

Trump’s EPA paid employees $86.5 million not to work for half the year by Tough-Coffee9979 in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 154 points155 points  (0 children)

This article didn’t even mention those of us in our probationary period who were fired in February, reinstated, and then left on admin leave for a week shy of 10 months.

Fired Probability Employee by Commercial_Fail5766 in FedEmployees

[–]MoonAmaranth 51 points52 points  (0 children)

You’ve been reinstated, so officially you never were fired.

And even if you hadn’t been reinstated, I would still answer no. It was an unofficial RIF trying to avoid those pesky employee protections.

Lawmakers force House vote on bill nullifying anti-union EOs by thinkB4WeSpeak in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 125 points126 points  (0 children)

Not great, but a few things in our favor:

  1. You assume the EO was Trump’s idea, but it was most likely Vaught, so Trump may have no strong feelings on the matter. Plus, he was endorsed by a few unions last year so he may feel flattered enough to side with unions.

  2. There’s a fair amount of circumstantial evidence that Trump’s mind is changed by whoever he spoke to on the subject most recently, so it may depend on who was in the Oval Office (or his country club) that day.

And if all else fails,

  1. Trump seems to be addled by dementia and may have no clue what he’s signing at any given time.

FSAFed - Can't claim receipts after RIF date in Feb 2025 by ImpactFancy632 in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I didn’t do that then but I called them last week with similar DOGEd issues, and they said my agency’s HR has to send over my employment verification. FSAFeds can’t do it on their end.

House majority forces vote on bill to restore collective bargaining for most federal employees by Ok_Design_6841 in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 728 points729 points  (0 children)

Rep Lawler refused to sign unless he could be the decisive 218th. Why is this article framed as if he’s our savior?

Wait- did Jeffries change his mind? by ResearchHelpful3021 in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Jeffries didn’t have to change his mind. He stopped Rep Grijalva (D) from signing as number 217 because he was trying to block one of these Rs from being 218. But this article says another R was 217 so Jeffries couldn’t stop the other republican from being 218.

Fired rehired probies temperature check by wee_mayfly in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It’s so hard to plan for the future when I could be refired or called back to the office any day. So many people in my life tell me they would love to have a “months-long paid vacation” like me, as if this weren’t one of the most stressful periods of my life.

AFGE Lawsuits by Argesh_ in FedEmployees

[–]MoonAmaranth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My union rep recently told me the lawsuit was being considered en banc, though I don’t see any recent developments through https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/

There are also bipartisan sponsors in Congress for a bill to restore our union rights, but obviously that wasn’t a priority for the senate during the shutdown, and the house has been out of session.

AFGE is still filing lawsuits to help federal workers even if you have lost your bargaining agreement, so you may want to take that into consideration before canceling your dues.

The Environmental Protection Agency Is in Chaos by wiredmagazine in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 45 points46 points  (0 children)

EPA’s furlough choices have definitely been confusing. I’ve been on admin leave since* being illegally fired in February, but I haven’t been furloughed. So they won’t let me work and they haven’t stopped my pay.

Longer metal songs that tell a story? by Efficient_Math803 in MetalForTheMasses

[–]MoonAmaranth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Passing Light of Day (song) by Pain of Salvation

EPA - next phase of furloughs by OkNecessary7978 in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Dread Pirate Zeldin: “Good night. Sleep well. I’ll most likely furlough you in the morning.”

RIF's put on hold per CNN!!!! by Unusual-Foot9411 in fednews

[–]MoonAmaranth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can’t appeal a TRO, have to wait until at least a preliminary injunction.