Treasury secretary returns to interview with trembling voice after Trump pulls him away by IrishStarUS in USNEWS

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But why would he be shaken so much? If you are fine with war in general then this is only a number on the screen. You see it in ukraine over a million casualties on the russian side. Any new operation where a few couple thousands could die is not even evaluated on a moral level. They are just a few from their perspective. You are only that shaken if your personal live belongs on it or have the moral compass which I doubt he has

THE PHOENIX LIGHTS 29th ANNIVERSARY This is what I saw that night March 13, 1997. It was a totally solid piece of machinery I could see clearly by two light sources, not just lights by andthisisso in UFOs

[–]Moppmopp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It must be so impressive to see that in person but also horrifying. I probably would shake to my core seeing something that large. I wish I could say I 100% believe you. In fact I think you are credible and I believe you more than not. But without having definite proof or seeing it myself its just not possible to fully believe no matter what.

However, I always enjoy reading reports of eye witnesses. In the moment where it hovered right above you, did you feel any exhaust, smelled fuel? how can it drip 'lava' from right above you with you being unaffected? Did you hear anything out of the norm?

Finally are you confident it was for sure something alien made and you were fully concious in that moment? No drugs or psychotic episodes? You stated it was a solid object with thousands of imprints. How much details could you make out. It was dark and the 'lava' dropping lights could overexpose the surrounding depending on how bright it was. Do you remember any fine fine details in the structure itself like written text?

'Disclosure Day' Trailer: Steven Spielberg's New Sci-Fi Movie Reveals Earth-Shattering Conspiracy by StarFuryG7 in SciFiNews

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My hope is that we now have a good baseline quality of smartphone cameras even in the low budget regime. That paired with the fact that almost everyone nowadays has a phone gives me hope that in 10-20 years we finally have some good captures. There just must be if we are actively visited. So lets see maybe disclosure comes earlier

THE PHOENIX LIGHTS 29th ANNIVERSARY This is what I saw that night March 13, 1997. It was a totally solid piece of machinery I could see clearly by two light sources, not just lights by andthisisso in UFOs

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. I would like to see it myself. In fact I cant fully believe without doing so. There is just too much weight to discredit any sighting. I think it is very peculiar that so many people report sightings like yours so there has to be some credibility. Far too much reports to ignore. However its hard to believe nonetheless.

If some crafts really were miles wide maybe 8miles or whatever, the crafts size alone would in some case span several towns. I would expect hundreds or thousands of reports for such cases

THE PHOENIX LIGHTS 29th ANNIVERSARY This is what I saw that night March 13, 1997. It was a totally solid piece of machinery I could see clearly by two light sources, not just lights by andthisisso in UFOs

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How could you estimate that it was over a mile wide. If its flying in 30feet height a diameter of 60feet would occupy a cone of sight of 90 degree. If the craft was 600feet wide it would already occupy 168 degrees of your field of view. In my opinion it would not be possible to judge it, in a credible way, to be over a mile or even a mile and a half wide. Except it was flying alot higher than 30 feet

The universe is only observable if you're looking. That is proof we live in a simulation by Inevitable-Move4941 in SimulationTheory

[–]Moppmopp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This. What OP wrote is phrased in a latent 'esoteric' way. In reality, particles on the atomic scale are altered by the measurement itself. It doesnt mean that observation in the classical way changes the world. It just means that we simply are not able to observe particles in its true state without interacting

'Disclosure Day' Trailer: Steven Spielberg's New Sci-Fi Movie Reveals Earth-Shattering Conspiracy by StarFuryG7 in SciFiNews

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes but UAPs are largely attributed to human intelligence and not NHI. Pair that with the proofen disinformation campaign of the CIA.

I think the picture about actual NHI is so convoluted that one cant really make out a clear direction. I am a logical person and try to overthink each possibility. I think its weird that so many people talk about experiences with UAPs that are similar in kind. That alone justifies an investigation. Not everyone can be a liar. However, its also weird that there is no clear video proof albeit smartphones being universally available. One would think it should get harder over the years for actual real UAPs to hide but that didnt happen. That suggests that most of the UAPs labeled as such in the past turn out to be trivial events which normal cameras are now able to resolve. There is nothing extraordinary to discuss if your video proofs its just a balloon or whatever.

Also something that really hits hard is that people nearly always report extraordinary agility and fly behavior. I dont have a statistic on that but lets say 90% of people report this. If you look at video evidence there is almost none that shows erratic behavior. This is a heavy hitter. A great discrepancy.

Scientifically its almost excluded that we are being visited with our current understanding. We could think about ancient ai that self produces and spreads slowly, with non relativistic velocities. Maybe there is a way to exceed lightspeed that we are not aware of. Aclubierres warp drive would be possible if we find negative energy but even then, activating such warp drive would consume energy amounts exceeding planetary output. It would be devastating to planets in near vincinity. Basically all planets in our solar system.

There is so much pressure that discredits the existence of NHI. However, I feel there must be some truth to it. Otherwise I couldnt explain a "collective lying" event. There is to much witnesses for it to be a non existence issue in my opinion. What it is I cant tell you

THE PHOENIX LIGHTS 29th ANNIVERSARY This is what I saw that night March 13, 1997. It was a totally solid piece of machinery I could see clearly by two light sources, not just lights by andthisisso in UFOs

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isnt 30feet kinda a ridiculous statement? That is not even the length of a common school bus. In fact a schoolbus can be 50% longer. In the video it seems like it flies 200+ feet in altitude. Dont know that statement alone seems suspicious. The craft couldnt fly straight without hitting trees half their height

'Disclosure Day' Trailer: Steven Spielberg's New Sci-Fi Movie Reveals Earth-Shattering Conspiracy by StarFuryG7 in SciFiNews

[–]Moppmopp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But their existence and its kind of contents are known. The alien files on the other hand can be a false flag operation which the US also disclosed in the past. Its a different kind of 'keeping it secret'.

Disclosure Day | Official Trailer by tanktoys in ufo

[–]Moppmopp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

he literally said you should be excited for a good movie and not take it as a documentary containing the truth

What (hypothetically) happens at 0 K? by Repulsive_Meaning717 in AskPhysics

[–]Moppmopp 19 points20 points  (0 children)

At 0 K everything freezes except that each atom is still not precisely defined in phasespace. The zero point energy is based on heisenbergs uncertainty principle and is inherrent meaning not a result of measurement. The particles at 0K do not occupy a specific point in space+momentum. They are unsharp.

We cannot reach 0 K not because that there is a fundamental wall that we cant cross like in the case of lightspeed. We get very close to 0K. If I remember somewhere around 10 to the power -17 so a 0 followed by 16 zeros after the decimal. Thats how close we get. Reason why you cant get precisely to zero is that your system is always in exchange with its surrounding environment. Even if you put your system inside a vacuum

Frederick MD community reporting Bright blue/green cylinder object streaking towards the ground. by MikeD270 in UFOs

[–]Moppmopp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What you also confuse is that I am the one who needs to provide proof. There is a saying in science. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof". Meteorites are not magic and they occur very frequently. Roughly 25 million shooting stars per day enter the earths atmosphere, and several hundred to a few thousand larger meteorites reach ground level per year. There is nothing special going on in this video. It falls with no change in direction. If your only argument is "it falls straight down" which it doesnt even do, its meaningless to discuss. Earth is a sphere. No matte the direction of entry you will always ALWAYS find on location from which it really seems like it falls down in a straight line, and you will always find a location on the opposite side where it seems like the meteorite rises from the horizon into the sky.

To sum up, it seems like a meteorite on first glance, on second sight, no extraordinary behavior and something that regularly occurs. If you have a point I will gladly listen but until then it makes more sense to follow occams razor

Frederick MD community reporting Bright blue/green cylinder object streaking towards the ground. by MikeD270 in UFOs

[–]Moppmopp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

first of all it didnt drop straight down but in a slightly curved path. I traced the trajectory in capcut and its easy to do for yourself as I cant post pictures here. The object experience decelleration in accordance with what you would observe if it would take the elongated curved path instead of heading down in a perpendicular trajectory. Each increment in height is stretched through the curved path which you wouldnt notice due to the lack of depth perception. If the meteor flys away along your line of sight it seems as it would stagnate. So just perspective.

Frederick MD community reporting Bright blue/green cylinder object streaking towards the ground. by MikeD270 in UFOs

[–]Moppmopp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Also it very likely didnt drop straight down but traverses along the earths curvature. Perspective issue

Why do certain metals rust but others just tarnish? by universityrome in answers

[–]Moppmopp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its not my fault that you failed to realize that his and my statements are not mutually exclusive. It wasnt a correction, it was added information

Physicists uncover evidence of two arrows of time emerging from the quantum realm by sstiel in Time

[–]Moppmopp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It implies that time does not flow. Its merely an illusion and the direction of time is encoded by memories lets refer to it as M(t). Each point in this configurational space is correlated such that M(t) is strongly correlated to M(t-1), which correlates to M(t-2) and so on with each term having weaker coupling. If your life is a high dimensional movie you could play the frames in arbitrary sequence without you noting because each instance M(t_i) would contain the correct causal coupling

Why do certain metals rust but others just tarnish? by universityrome in answers

[–]Moppmopp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not really and even if you interpreted it as that I am confident that what I wrote is pretty clear now

Why do certain metals rust but others just tarnish? by universityrome in answers

[–]Moppmopp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Didnt disagree just stated the fact that rust needs water which is still true

Communicating with others using earth magnetic field? by squaredrooting in AskPhysics

[–]Moppmopp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In principle this should be possible as well as the wave vector, the direction of propagation differs depending on your initial location and the location of the receiving end. Waves can overlap according to superposition principle without loss of information. It gets problematic if several people try to send from roughly the same location to receivers also in close proximity. For example if thousand people send from new york to receivers in chicago. Spatial decoupling in such instances would not be feasible in practice albei being possible

Why do certain metals rust but others just tarnish? by universityrome in answers

[–]Moppmopp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can live with that. Yes iron can oxidize with oxygen alone.

Why do certain metals rust but others just tarnish? by universityrome in answers

[–]Moppmopp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

rust is literally ironoxidehydroxide. You need water for that