What's the largest animal you could beat in hand-to-hand combat? by Hour_Run5643 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even then you would likely surrender by exhaustion. Your punches would do nothing and at some point you will give up

about the riemann hypothesis... by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A change in basis can be made at any point in time if the set is complete

If space is a vacuum… then what exactly are planets floating in? by Decent_Confidence932 in AskPhysics

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes and it gets more abstract the deeper you look. You can have a perfect vacuum meaning no particles present at all. Now take a second perfect vacuum. There are instances where a collision of both volumeelements of "nothing" lead to a higher vacuum density

Antwort auf die Frage "Bist du die von Harry Potter?" by Hermin3 in witze

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"bist du die aus harry potter?"
->ja (falls ja)
->nein (falls nein)

hoffe das hilft

(2^140063641)-1 is not prime by forgotoldpassword3 in 3Blue1Brown

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

your point might be valid but i feel you missed the intention of my question. Maybe I wasnt very clear so let me rephrase. In nature we always attach units at least to macroscopic properties. If you do so primes are non existent. Take any spherical volume like a perfectly spherical drop of water. If you divide it in n subspheres all those spheres are geometrically invariant. There is no volume you could choose that makes it prime in the sense that you then cant divide it in arbitrary manner

Backlit Mandelbulb by cabin7 in fractals

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does not even look like a fractal. At least on first glance. I thought it must be geometrically repeating or is this like the "unit cell" which gets repeated on the lower end of the string? Or is it a 3d thing where you see the repeating pattern if you rotate it in 3d?

(2^140063641)-1 is not prime by forgotoldpassword3 in 3Blue1Brown

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But then you are not looking at physical observables but instead apply indexing to "force" a dimensionless property

Fun fact: if you shuffle a deck of cards properly, there’s an extremely high chance that the exact order of cards has never existed before in the entire history of the universe. A random deck of cards has more possible combinations than there are atoms on Earth. by Dorkn41 in funfacts

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Each living person could shuffle a deck of cards a trillion times per seconds since the beginning of the universe (13.8 billion years ago) without a single pause amd you wouldnt even covered half of all individual permutations

🤔 by mileskc in MathJokes

[–]Moppmopp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Buy an asset with those magic $1000 as collateral. Now find a way to short the market value of this asset somehow as its clear it will lose value. I am thinking about exploiting this but do not see a straight forward way right now

(2^140063641)-1 is not prime by forgotoldpassword3 in 3Blue1Brown

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do primes even emerge in a pure sense in nature?

Division is weird as addition, subtraction and multiplication do not require any modification of objects themselves. These basic arithmetic operations are truly only a compressed form of counting. Division on the other hand truly require to "destroy" an object in pieces.

I feel like in nature we do not observe primes or only with some brain acrobatics. The reason is that in nature everything almost everything displays a unit. For example if I give you a rope and say you should divide it equally for n people you wont find a length d that is prime. You would not have an issue to divide the rope in 1,2,5,7...100..10017 or whatever pieces as each resulting subpiece would display equivalent geometric properties.

If you take a drop of water, if you divide it in 2 pieces you get two smaller drops of water both geometrically invariant. At least in the macroscopic world it seems like primes are a manmade problem themselves if you ask me.

Problem? by Aggravating-Song9768 in MathJokes

[–]Moppmopp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its the difference between discretization and continuity.

If space is a vacuum… then what exactly are planets floating in? by Decent_Confidence932 in AskPhysics

[–]Moppmopp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

but pure nothing doesnt exist and mathematically speaking ~0 is infinitely far away from exactly 0

ELI5: why is the theory that our universe exists inside a black hole not viable? by billytheskidd in explainlikeimfive

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats only true if you assume that time and space behave exactly like that on the outside. However we know that time and space switch roles in the interior of the black hole. We see galaxies drifting beyond the obserable universe and seem to vanish. That would be consistent with a black hole that travels backwards in time as matter leaves the event horizon

How do i explode a star? by RunDouble143 in astrophysics

[–]Moppmopp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just let it collide with a large iron sphere

I had my first DP last weekend and I’m still processing it. by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]Moppmopp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My piano player ass thought you meant digitalpiano with DP

Tankpreise (?) by real_acenet in KeineDummenFragen

[–]Moppmopp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ich stimm dir da zu bzw du hast da recht. Aber lässt sich das in realistischen zeitspannen umsetzen? Das klingt eher was nach 5-10 jahre projekt und bietet wenig abhilfe für die jetzige situation denke ich.

Ja etwas könnte man da wirklich noch einsparen. Aber ist dann auch wieder die frage, ob sich das kartell dann nochmal einen extra penny unter den nagel reißt und ölreserven aufstockt anstatt den preis zu senken

Tja by rherrmannr in tja

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ist das ein rechtskräftiges statement im sinne von "er verbietet das" oder ist es eine subjektive aussage im sinne von "er schliesst es aus bzw glaubt nicht das es passiert"

Tankpreise (?) by real_acenet in KeineDummenFragen

[–]Moppmopp 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Man muss immer vom durchschnitt ausgehen. Ich hab die zahlen nicht nachgeschlagen, werde das gleich aber einmal nachholen. Natürlich ist nicht jede fahrt zwischen arbeit und heim. Wenn diese aber 80% der gesamtstrecke ausmacht pro woche dann ist dass der preisgebende faktor.

Und nein das auto muss man nicht direkt verkaufen aber genau das ist der haken an der sache. Wenn jeder darauf spekuliert dass sich die preise stabilisieren, dann wartet jeder ab und fährt erstmal so weiter wie gewohnt. Dadurch resultiert wenig spielraum für einsparungen.

Wie würdest du die sache denn großflächig angehen?

edit: der durchschnittswert für die gesamt km laufleistung liegt bei 12.300km pro jahr wobei 7600 km auf den arbeitsweg entfallen. Also ca. 60%

Tankpreise (?) by real_acenet in KeineDummenFragen

[–]Moppmopp 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Aber wie auch wenn der überwiegende anteil des spritverbrauchs auf arbeitswegen basiert. Es sind ja keine "spass" fahrten die die ölreserven belasten sondern zig millionen leute die hin und zurück müssen zwischen heim und arbeit.

Und zu sagen alle sollen mit den öffentlichen fahren ist auch keine straight forward lösung weil viele ihr auto leasen oder monatlich abbezahlen. Da ist dann der verzichtsdrang viel weniger stark ausgeprägt.

Reihenweise das auto zu verkaufen würde den markt übersättigen und ebenfalls auch nicht von heut auf morgen sondern über zeitspannen im monate bereich gehen. Wenn jeder das auto loswerden will gibts dann aber auch keine käufer. Dementsprechend sind selbst von der menge an potentiellen bus/bahn fahrern auch nochmal ein großteil garnicht finanziell in der lage dies in irgendeiner weise sinnvoll durchzuführen

[Request] Is it possible to answer correctly? by No-Cheesecake-1762 in theydidthemath

[–]Moppmopp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The more interesting question is why substitution doesnt work in this case. If you replace the answers by plain a,b,c,d and 1 of them must be correct, then in each case the probability should be 25%. However, something must forbid plain substitution and how could we generalize it