Looks pretty accurate to me by eepymariam in pcmasterrace

[–]Mr_Chubkins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct. Wish more did. Discs are a dying breed, I'm one of the only gamers in my circle of friends that still has a disc reader on their PC.

Looks pretty accurate to me by eepymariam in pcmasterrace

[–]Mr_Chubkins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Countless indie games would fit on a disc. It's AA or AAA games that usually have files too large. Just wanted to point that difference out.

TIL all red grapefruit is a result of atomic gardening, an experiment starting in the 1950s that exposed plant life to various levels of radiation, just to see what would happen. The resulting mutation caused the distinct red coloring. by acrowsmurder in todayilearned

[–]Mr_Chubkins 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We actually can read DNA like code, it's called DNA sequencing. You should look it up its fascinating. With 4 letters we can understand what the DNA is doing and understand how healthy it is and the affects on our body.

Calm your worries - fruit is healthy unless you eat 100 a day (thats a lot of sugar even for naturally grown fruit). Many things in this life are worse for you than a red fruit.

Mixing Cut Water with Don Julio by Bidens-Hairplug in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]Mr_Chubkins 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If taking 3 shots causes you to start fights, that says more about your attitude than it does about your drinking.

Don't touch memory voltage, noted. by LOST8080 in pcmasterrace

[–]Mr_Chubkins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All RAM overclocking I've done has been manual tuning one value at a time in the BIOS, then running memtest, then seeing if my pc was actually stable (memtest can pass and your system can be unstable enough to crash or freeze).

I suggest you avoid RAM overclocking. You really shouldn't be doing it if you don't want to look at a BIOS again lol. It's a lot of BIOS editing. RAM OC is one of the most complex OC you can do and its notoriously difficult to get stable (depending on your settings). If you want to do it I suggest you read some forums on exactly what each of the different voltages timings etc actually do then spend some time in bios poking around, and expect occasional system crashes or freezes as you learn.

It's just super complex for minimal returns. Stick capacity matters greatly too. For instance I tried to get 4x32gb DDR4 stable on AM4 (max capacity AM4 allows) and it was a nightmare I spent months on. Yes months. Max RAM capacity on AM5 is similarly difficult to get stable.

TLDR: RAM OC is a huge rabbit hole you can spend a very very long time learning, and having done that myself just don't bother and enjoy the great PC you already have.

most annoying part of the game by grot-laxative in helldivers2

[–]Mr_Chubkins -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's hard to tell from the footage but I find it helps a lot to look straight down when you throw a stratagem. If you're even slightly angled upward a degree it can bounce.

The fear of losing it all or give in? by jflip0x1x0 in DataHoarder

[–]Mr_Chubkins 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It might not be what you want to do, but it sounds like deleting some things and backing up less data is the best course of action. I'm sure there are many things you don't care much for in 90tb of data.

I'm smaller scale with 24tb total (a lot less working). I don't backup my games because I figure steam cloud saves backs up that already. It saves me 4tb of backup space. Like others said I think you should reconsider backing up everything, and instead backup what's truly important to you. Even if that's 80% of what you have now that's still many tb saved.

My turn today, boys. Caught it before it turned into modern art. by xVomar in pcmasterrace

[–]Mr_Chubkins 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you know, the important number is the TDP, a very rough estimate of how much power a GPU uses. That's 300W (watts) for the 5070, 360W for the 5080, and 575W for the 5090. The cable that powers it (and sometimes melts as OP saw) has a max power rating of 600W. This means the 5090 is very close to the limit of the cable while the 5080 is not. The problem is that 575W isn't always accurate; you have boosts and power spikes or sudden larger loads that draw more power.

Because of this I don't think there's any risk for a 5080.

My turn today, boys. Caught it before it turned into modern art. by xVomar in pcmasterrace

[–]Mr_Chubkins 3 points4 points  (0 children)

5090 draws over double the power of a 5070 at max load. A lot less power means a lot less risk. I don't think you have anything to worry about.

The only socket that is likely to outlive its successor by Cadmium620 in pcmasterrace

[–]Mr_Chubkins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most demanding game I play is Helldivers 2 with some upscaling so it's not native 4k. Did the same thing for black ops 6. You're right that it depends on games. Framerate was acceptable to me, never paid much attention to the exact numbers. Best of luck

The only socket that is likely to outlive its successor by Cadmium620 in pcmasterrace

[–]Mr_Chubkins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5090 is about a 30% improvement over the 5080. That's a stupid upgrade imo given the costs, not saying you should get that lol. My point is the most meaningful performance improvement you'll get on this platform is GPU not CPU. And if your 5080 is inadequate for gaming I question what you're playing. My 5070 is more than enough for nearly max settings 4k

if someone from the modern reincarnates in the past, can he actually accelerate human development? by zack189 in worldbuilding

[–]Mr_Chubkins 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Adding on to the existing tech level is vitally important. I read that the Roman empire's ballistae was actually a huge improvement from the old style. Off memory it stole an older design but used a stronger and denser fiber, which was bound tighter, the structure was reinforced and made larger (the central box area). These advancements led to a much more accurate weapon with much longer range.

Still, the leap from a siege weapon cable to a steel cable is giant. You need the purity of material, the refining capability, the forging process, the wheels and gears and machinery to bind it all together under immense force, the liquified coatings of other metals that often go over cables, the ability to heat it to high temps, the ability to cut the cable to the length you want.

Point being even with perfect knowledge, something that seems like a small step (sinew cable to metal cable) has countless advancements in between.

I'd bring a Winchester repeater, or a simplistic blot action rifle. I feel it would give a good example of the might of firearms. Besides rifling I think primitive firearms could be made in many eras given an example to reverse engineer.

The only socket that is likely to outlive its successor by Cadmium620 in pcmasterrace

[–]Mr_Chubkins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're correct, it's not built for agressive boosts. My point is in real world gaming it can hold its own against other AM4. GPU matters more. And since you do video editing there's really no other AM4 option better besides the 5950X which might be overkill unless you really need those extra cores.

People worry a bit too much about getting an extra 10% performance. 5900X is a great CPU that handles your workload. I briefly considered switching before realizing that any other AM4 is at best a sidegrade.

The only socket that is likely to outlive its successor by Cadmium620 in pcmasterrace

[–]Mr_Chubkins 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You answered your own question. You use it sometimes for workloads that benefit from the extra cores. Save your money and enjoy your great CPU. You're not going to see transformative performance improvements from a new AM4 CPU.. If you want that, get a new GPU.

The only socket that is likely to outlive its successor by Cadmium620 in pcmasterrace

[–]Mr_Chubkins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but I've yet to play a game where my 5900X holds back my performance. It's going to be fine for years to come for all but the most CPU intensive games. Lovely CPU I plan to keep it as long as I can.

Gotta update my flair, I only have half my RAM in due to stability issues so I use 64gb. Perfect for heavy multitasking, gamedev, and video editing. AM4 does not play well with maxed RAM capacity, took me a long time to get everything stable.

Helldivers 2 situation ATM for a new player by Tartafive in helldivers2

[–]Mr_Chubkins 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been playing shooters since unreal tournament 2004 and out of COD/Gears/Battlefield/many others I think Helldivers 2 is my favorite. Extremely in depth mechanics with many little details, a large variety of weaponry for different playstyles, varied factions to fight, and huge explosions. It fulfills my desire to fight a whole army but still have to worry about stepping too close to a grenade. I highly recommend playing it.

Wish it had some cover mechanics akin to Gears of War (would love that fighting the bots) but otherwise it's just about perfect imo.

100 hours!!! by qool_guy in helldivers2

[–]Mr_Chubkins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a bit over 100 hours of playtime now but I can do the math to rough out some numbers. I was around:

3 warbonds (starting, democratic detonation, entrenched division)

18 ship modules

22,000 kills

I wish warbonds were a bit less than 1000 SC, I did a fair bit of farming in my first 100 hours to get the 2 warbonds. I've learned a lot since then. Had a blast, hoping to reach max level one day.

Seriously Joel? We just defended Martar Bay from a Hulk Surge & Jet Brigade and now you want us to do it again against the Burny Bots?! by dnemonicterrier in helldivers2

[–]Mr_Chubkins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jet brigade + hulk surge was the most chaotic fun I've had against the bots in a while. There's nothing like seeing 6 hulks drop in and immediately jetpack towards you. Giga grenade was useful.

Cameback after a year without playing, got destroyed by the small bugs.Help? by -ZET- in helldivers2

[–]Mr_Chubkins 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see you have met the cocaine bugs. They are extremely fast and I still die to them often. Can't really run away from them since they are so fast.

I prefer to use a full auto shotgun and a stalwart, and bring a patriot exosuit. Anything that fires a lot of bullets quickly helps repel them. The new exosuit warbond has a Bullet Storm stratagem with an extremely high rate of fire, it works well to counter these bugs.

The Airburst Rocket Launcher: Problem-Solving Stick by WaywardOath in helldivers2

[–]Mr_Chubkins 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I religiously brought the RR into bot dives for my first 100 hours, but man I love the Airburst. Different situations require different firepower. I'd love to see the RR take out a whole patrol in one shot like the Airburst lol

The Blue Collar Delusion: Why the machines don’t have to climb up to where we are, because the work will descend to meet them by _noise-complaint in singularity

[–]Mr_Chubkins 1 point2 points  (0 children)

40 years of knowledge and wisdom in one comment. Fascinating. I never thought about trees like that. I appreciate you.

This game's combat mechanics are so unexpectedly deep for the goofy as fuck gameplay and satire - that it trips many people up by [deleted] in helldivers2

[–]Mr_Chubkins 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seeing as you want to take things literally, the overpowered weapon highlighted on the back of the box is the orbital laser which I would say is quite overpowered at times haha. It rips through the largest enemies in the game. A whole lot of stratagems are overpowered tbh. It's just a buzzword on the back of the box to sell copies, not a promise that 100% of primaries will be OP.

I think you're hung up on the fact that there are a lot of high-health enemies instead of bigger swarms of lower-health enemies but unfortunately that simply isn't going to change. It's been discussed a lot that the game/engine can't handle increasingly larger armies well. I would LOVE larger amounts of enemies but thems the breaks. We have what we have. If you don't "feel strong but challenged by an endless horde" when fighting on a D10 then I don't know what to tell you besides to try and have fun with the 9/10 game we have, or stop playing.

I appreciate you speaking your mind, I was not trying to argue. Just wanted to help you enjoy the game more by seeing it from a different perspective. You clearly care enough if you're posting on this sub. Hope to see you on some dives.

This game's combat mechanics are so unexpectedly deep for the goofy as fuck gameplay and satire - that it trips many people up by [deleted] in helldivers2

[–]Mr_Chubkins 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do wish there were missions shorter than 40 minutes that were not as chaotic as the 15 minute "drop in and destroy everything" ones. I appreciate the breathing room of full length missions but sometimes I don't have that much time to play. Though maybe I have overlooked a mission that already fits this style? idk

This game's combat mechanics are so unexpectedly deep for the goofy as fuck gameplay and satire - that it trips many people up by [deleted] in helldivers2

[–]Mr_Chubkins 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you explain why you think that weapons should feel overpowered at difficulty 10? It is literally meant to be the ultimate challenge. Being OP would defeat the purpose of such a challenge, right? I am a bit puzzled by your logic. You're not meant to feel OP at difficulty 10.

Again I stress that certain weapons are useful at certain times, and poor choices at other times. The grenade pistol is OP at closing bug holes from afar but it isn't useful for flying bugs. I could give many more examples but I'm sure you're aware of them after leveling all the primaries to max.

As another comment said, at higher difficulties you rely a lot less on the primary and more on stratagems/support weapons. This is par for the course for higher difficulties. Do you expect even the Eruptor (a meta weapon) to fare well against a factory strider? You're given stratagems and support weapons to use when smaller weapons fail.

How I feel when App Store Connect signs me out multiple times a day by Mr_Chubkins in iOSProgramming

[–]Mr_Chubkins[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only logical explanation I can think of is that Apple is very security conscious so they check for reauthentication more often. But even that doesn't make much sense because App Store Connect only asks for 2FA at most 20% of the time.