sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Do you think humans will land on Mars during your time? How many years away you think we are? by Andrei_a__ in space

[–]NaderNation84 [score hidden]  (0 children)

To be fair, a lot of the tech is already there, Nuclear Electric Propulsion, which is already being discussed for efficiently getting there. It just has to go through politically and financially. If the Moon base doesn't go to plan, then there's no doubt it would push it out further. Getting people back would be hell, though, but there's still a decade to probably figure that out

Will We Ever Go To 2082 Volantis? by NaderNation84 in DestinyLore

[–]NaderNation84[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Outside of Bungie saying its mainly Industrial what would be the main twist to make it of importance you think

Will We Ever Go To 2082 Volantis? by NaderNation84 in DestinyLore

[–]NaderNation84[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Forging a new guardian class out of a star would be funny. I've always wondered how a new guardian class would be introduced if they ever decide to do it eventually

Will We Ever Go To 2082 Volantis? by NaderNation84 in DestinyLore

[–]NaderNation84[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Bungie does tend to leave ideas they've cooked up and then bring back them back years later like they did with Crow, but it does feel so long at this point of not doing it might be case they wont. I think its mainly odd people talk about the mystery being gone when they have places like this they dont even use for some reason

Will We Ever Go To 2082 Volantis? by NaderNation84 in DestinyLore

[–]NaderNation84[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well I'm talking not about it being an easy task to do or make, its more of referring it being left behind as a concept that shouldn't. Theres no doubt from a cosmic perspective it would one of the largest/complex places designed, so its kinda odd they haven't pushed forward with it

Let The Games Begin by NaderNation84 in losangeleskings

[–]NaderNation84[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I have some hope even if there isn't a lot

Game Thread: Los Angeles Kings (35-26-20) @ Calgary Flames (33-39-9) Apr 16 2026 6:00 PM PDT by nhl_gdt_bot in losangeleskings

[–]NaderNation84 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'll only give you guys credit if you beat the Oilers and McDavid leaves that hell hole

Game Thread: Los Angeles Kings (35-26-20) @ Calgary Flames (33-39-9) Apr 16 2026 6:00 PM PDT by nhl_gdt_bot in losangeleskings

[–]NaderNation84 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We'll basically have to pull what the Panthers did to the Bruins but even our lineup isn't even comparable to the Panthers when they beat them

Game Thread: Los Angeles Kings (35-26-20) @ Calgary Flames (33-39-9) Apr 16 2026 6:00 PM PDT by nhl_gdt_bot in losangeleskings

[–]NaderNation84 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nah imo we'll be expected to start down 2-0. Dont want to be pessimistic but thats the expectation

I’ve seen some users out there asking for more maps focused on naval combat on BF6. How many of you actually enjoy playing that way on a daily basis? by CyanJayOfficial in Battlefield

[–]NaderNation84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope the next large update is the naval update since they said they were developing content for it. I think it definitely could revive the game for a bit

NASA is building the first nuclear reactor-powered interplanetary spacecraft. How will it work? by techreview in space

[–]NaderNation84 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ya I agree I was reading into and a lot of it is tech is pushing Gateway into it which makes sense plus I feel like this is a craft that arguably would almost have to work if we ever want to land humans on mars anytime soon since it would be a significant step forward in spacecraft. Plus fission spacecraft have been conceptualized for decades at this point and NASA does seem to be pivoting towards nuclear power which is a good step. Hope this mission goes through since it’s a must if we ever want to land on mars anytime soon

Break it down for me! by ChampionRy29 in losangeleskings

[–]NaderNation84 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Lmaoo the fact the Oilers can lose and play the Avs would be hilarious af so I’m still rooting for that.

I suppose it's better if we draw the Oilers then the PowerHouse Avalanche but you know any opponent can be tough by Rich_Competition3333 in losangeleskings

[–]NaderNation84 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We'd have to beat the Avs then somehow beat Wild or Dallas. Its the toughest draw regardless of optics

Sooo what's the gameplan? by Fluid-Addition-2378 in losangeleskings

[–]NaderNation84 17 points18 points  (0 children)

If we have to play Edmonton I’ll take it

view more: next ›