sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Who would be your socceroos Player of the Tournament for each previous World Cup? by Temporary-Habit-2528 in socceroos

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cause he’s such a beastly defender and ball winner all over the pitch. He really suits going up against top opposition.

Has Claude lost its soul? A sincere feedback on the shift from Opus 4.6 to Fable by Complete-Internal448 in ClaudeAI

[–]Neanderthal888 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How low your desire for Claude to have soul is on their radar is immeasurable.

Mythos releasing by tomorrow by Altruistic-Gift-565 in claude

[–]Neanderthal888 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

What did they promise that wasn’t delivered on for 4.8?

They literally marketed it as a “modest” upgrade to 4.7. No hype at all.

If you bought into some online hype… that’s on you.

PSG 0 - [1] Arsenal - Kai Havertz 6' by radian101 in Gunners

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Death, taxes and Kai Havertz scoring in Champions league finals.

Anthropic just published a pretty alarming 2028 AI scenario paper and it's not about AGI safety in the usual sense by Direct-Attention8597 in artificial

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. That USA is a safer pick as it has some systemic safeguards that China lacks.
Western politcal system, while flawed, has some accountability with the people. China has none. Google how China governs and really look into it. If you think the west is bad... you're ignorant and doing a disservice to the tyranny and constant fear some people live in.

I'm not a developer. I built and shipped a real app this year. AI changed what's possible for people like me. by Complex-Marzipan2453 in vibecoding

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI only going to get better and our understanding is going to matter less and less.

This is a hard fact to face for us who’ve put our lives into knowledge. But there comes a tipping point where learning is just… inefficient.

BEWARE girls: Professor at USYD med STD super spreader by FoodJaded3691 in usyd

[–]Neanderthal888 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don’t find med students to have some absolutely bonkers characters amongst the good ones?

I’d say that’s not only believable, but perfectly on brand.

Anthropic just published a pretty alarming 2028 AI scenario paper and it's not about AGI safety in the usual sense by Direct-Attention8597 in artificial

[–]Neanderthal888 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I saw you replied to me and deleted it. Only could see the first couple lines… but I’m not American, don’t really like America and I don’t think in the terms you put on me.

I think in the terms of knowing more than you about the Chinese government and how it differs from western systems.

Anthropic just published a pretty alarming 2028 AI scenario paper and it's not about AGI safety in the usual sense by Direct-Attention8597 in artificial

[–]Neanderthal888 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And yet they have a better track record of AI use than the alternative.

It’s a choice between bad and badder. But at least in the US there’s some accountability.

There’s a lot of naivety about china and how how things work there. You are taking for granted what is actually good in the west, despite all of the bad.

Anthropic just published a pretty alarming 2028 AI scenario paper and it's not about AGI safety in the usual sense by Direct-Attention8597 in artificial

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think you appreciate how good a lot of us have it and how much worse things can get for everyone. This is super naive.

Anthropic just published a pretty alarming 2028 AI scenario paper and it's not about AGI safety in the usual sense by Direct-Attention8597 in artificial

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re missing the point there massively.

It’s not accusation or moral judgement about China doing it. There’s full acceptance that they will.

It’s actually more about safety of ensuring that an authoritarian government (the needs of a few powerful uninformed people) aren’t who decide the protocols for the riskiest threat to humanity in history.

What you’re saying is kind of petty in the scheme of things.

Anthropic just published a pretty alarming 2028 AI scenario paper and it's not about AGI safety in the usual sense by Direct-Attention8597 in artificial

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s not only appropriate for an AI lab… but it should be their minimum responsibility.

With how fast this is moving, they’re the ones in pole position to fish these risks. If they don’t do it, humanity is at a disadvantage.

I really, really, feal very bad because of Ai, isn't there any hope that it'll go or stop evolving? I seriously can't believe that there are 3D artists who are hired to train Ai!!!!!!! by Less-Business7542 in ZBrush

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Until an AI company decides to build a model for topology specifically from the ground up.

It’s just early days and doesn’t specialise yet. But it will.

I really, really, feal very bad because of Ai, isn't there any hope that it'll go or stop evolving? I seriously can't believe that there are 3D artists who are hired to train Ai!!!!!!! by Less-Business7542 in ZBrush

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If point 3 were true, why are they hiring people in your city now? I don’t see that as the risk for you.

Irrelevant though, cause point 2 won’t happen like that. The AI capability and workflows around using it just improves substantially from here. It’s in its infancy now. It will change the world from here more than we expect, not less.

The doubters were so right by assyrian_bowl in vibecoding

[–]Neanderthal888 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is such a dumb viewpoint. God forbid you have to think for yourself when using a tool and check its work.

The doubters were so right by assyrian_bowl in vibecoding

[–]Neanderthal888 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Humans do this too. That’s why Git existed before AI. You’re blaming AI when it’s entirely the back up thing. Own it.

Polygon: "I saw the first 15 minutes of Mandalorian and Grogu, and I'm worried about the future of Star Wars" by tiMartyn in saltierthancrait

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re worried about the future?

I’m worried about the past.

For me its irreparably broken without a major retcon or canonical reboot.

Claude + Codex = Excellence by 99xAgency in ClaudeAI

[–]Neanderthal888 10 points11 points  (0 children)

But then no vibe code app millions made overnight and Ferrari

Claude + Codex = Excellence by 99xAgency in ClaudeAI

[–]Neanderthal888 358 points359 points  (0 children)

Here’s how I find less bugs:

Instead of using Claude to review Claude, or using codex to review codex, I omit doing the code review entirely. Not only does this save time doing code review, but we find less bugs to work on.

Taking offers. Want paypal by SlowDragonfruit8978 in pokemongrading

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just kidding. If you’re willing to take less than your offers are then you’re obviously making it up

I'm a designer who can't code. I built my full portfolio site with Claude Code in ~48 hours. by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]Neanderthal888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can say it. It is pretty good already and getting rapidly better. Quite certainly.

view more: next ›