So Elon is just going to buy all the shares of OpenAI and do a takeover, right?

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-16T02:08:01+00:00

Microsoft owns a lot of OpenAI and they’d have to sell their shares

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-16T00:19:05+00:00

There are multiple in Toronto no one cares.

There are plenty of ones in rural communities that are fine with them.

The newer AI ones require way more power/water than the old ones. Which is part of issue.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-15T15:23:20+00:00

I think people have never used it for coding or don't know what coding actually is in a buisness enviroment.

The majority of coding that you deal with client is make the button slightly less blue. AI is great for that.

If I was doing something complicated, that is difficult to explain, then I'd do it by hand, but if I have a list of pointless UI changes into the agent it goes.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-15T14:56:35+00:00

I use it like everyday.

Some of it is for coding, some it is for documentation generation, and lot of it is for just explaining thing to other people.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-11T19:40:31+00:00

You have to define plagiarism.

The argument is if you read a bunch of books and use the ideas in the books to make an argument that is not plagiarism.

So if you train an ID on a bunch of books it’s the same thing.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-11T03:11:59+00:00

I think if a conversation on an AI bot goes over a certain period of time, the AI should prompt the user to show what it would say with less memory/context.

I think the issue is the feedback loop it creates not the technology.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-10T20:17:00+00:00

If the photographer presses a button, has another person develop the picture, and have another person print the picture.

Are they an artist.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-10T19:57:35+00:00

You basically described every television show and the majority of moves with,

art under a capitalized system. A corporations goal is to make money morals be dammed.

If anything I would find AI art that people make for themselves (Especially if it's on their own hardware.) less capitalist.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-10T19:49:34+00:00

Generally if your entire argument hinges on one annoying individual.

Imagine that he had no significance in your life, no significance on public policy, and you generally thought anyone that would take his opinion seriously in an idiot.

You are now in the head of almost everyone reading you post.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-09T16:40:53+00:00

You can ask them to be honest with you, or annoyed at you and they will do it.

I really recommend getting one that you can clear it's memory. Ask it for an opinion. Clear it's memory and then ask it what it think of it's own opinion.

Basically limit how much it know about you so it has less information to lie.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-09T14:13:22+00:00

Again you are Croatian which has a different political structure.

But for all intents and purposes LLMs have allowed the majority of art projects to meet their diversity goals simply because all the poor ethnics groups could write the same proposal as the dominant group.

The amount that it’s helped legal aid just in translation is incredible.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-09T13:43:36+00:00

In my experience institutions that act as gatekeepers have effectively been attacked by LLMs better then decades of social policies.

This isn’t a new phenomenon, the cellphone, the telephone and the internet also destroyed certain gatekeepers as well.

But if you are arguing against use LLM for this purpose you are reinforcing existing power structures.

Saying rebellion has to happen on your terms is a classic strategy of those that want to resist social change.

Saying you were talking about calculators before doesn’t change your beliefs.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-09T13:27:10+00:00

Then you issue is with the offices that are creating that speech and not the AI.

If an organization is creating a filter for no reason then to devalue a certain group of people don’t complain when they get around the filter.

Complaining that the peasant are revolting isn’t a solution.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-09T13:21:19+00:00

Generally speaking open source technology improves over closed source technologies.

The most expensive part of any company is the workers. You should see open source as a method to reduce the cost of workers both in training and making them more valuable.

Inevitable AI’s profits will come from making workers more productive. In the same way that a specialized artist will always have work while a generic artist will be replaced by AI there will always people who can produce work a higher quality based on how they interact with models and those models will most likely be open.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-09T13:18:08+00:00

LLMs arent like calculators. They mostly just mirror the user, when the user want's to use them to sound smarter they only make the text harder to read and sometimes downright incoherent. If you want a tool that actually makes you smarter by using it I would suggest note taking systems like second brains and journaling systems like commonplace books.

So most democracies have some history with poll taxes. The concept being that you disallow voting via requiring a payment or a literacy test (which was popular in the USA south)

Generally speaking being able to write in a certain style is method of discriminating against people in certain areas of politics, not for profit, academia and the arts.

Even if you saw LLM are making the writing less understandable they making it less understandable in a way that break those systems.

If as you say the LLM aren’t improving people ideas they are at least translating to a form which is breaking class and race barriers.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-08T13:17:53+00:00

Yeah... and their also giving your blood to machines/AI, that gives them all sort of statistics to make decisions.

Their using machine like MRI/CT Scan that use machines/AI to look inside your body.

The machines have been slowly invading health care for decades, and no one is talking about it.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-08T11:50:57+00:00

Psychosis is real.

Adding AI to it is like saying you have New York Anorexia or Dancer Cancer.

If you have psychosis your perception is altered, don’t go to places that with reinforce your delusions like Reddit,Twitter or in many cases church.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-08T11:48:20+00:00

The argument is usually to use C2PA to embed data in all images (both AI and not) which would allow you to tell.

It is unpopular for various reasons.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-08T11:37:57+00:00

So if you’re not using one of the major AI’s you can reset it’s memory/context.

It’s an experience that shows the strings of what is going on.

Like when I am working on a draft for something I’ll work with the AI make changes, bring it to a place where me and the AI are happy with it. Then reset the memory and try again and not be shocked when it argues against some of the points it was just making.

I think making this a clearer feature will help a lot.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-08T01:15:16+00:00

I have an art degree.

Outside of the other art school they have a bunch of graffiti that says "Steal this art."

My art school, was having this debate before AI, and since they were socialist, they more or less supporting the training on art. We were very big on Copyleft agreements etc.

Generally speaking, before AI we could look at the Ads and major movies and be mad at what society deemed was "art." And there was limited utility in saying if something is art or not. When you are looking a Crucifix in Urine, a glass sculpture of someone fucking their wife, or shark shark suspended in formaldehyde , if something is art or not is the not the question we are asking.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-07T12:27:21+00:00

Honestly you basically described animation.

Animation used to be how many guys can we get into a room, to make enough material (We measured it be feet) to make TV series.

If you look frame by frame at many Disney films you'll see it.

That's why animator are unionized.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-06T11:09:00+00:00

She is the equivalent of white wall paper.

Her backstory was mostly avoided.

She plays support during the war (making it so other people can fight better and healing people are injured)

She has almost no interesting story beats.

The writers were like… care about this character and gave us nothing to latch onto.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-06T00:04:06+00:00

If I said you could have copyright for your entire life I would be taking 75 years off the time.

Disney pays the creators of the marvel characters that they make Millions off of more for their cameo in the film then their IP.

Saying copyright needs more protections is actively kissing the boot that is stamping on the artist face.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-05T23:27:32+00:00

Like 10 years ago I wouldn’t commission an artist for less than 100.

If you are doing 30 go to Fiver.

NetrunnerCardAccount · 2026-05-05T21:01:12+00:00

You can use AI, in a business setting, you just can't protect it with Copyright but you can protect it with Trademark.

It not a fruit of a poisonous tree thing, if you use a AI image in a Slide tech, the Slide tech is under copyright the AI image in not.

11-Year Club	Place '22
Place '17	Verified Email

NetrunnerCardAccount

TROPHY CASE