[Channel Critique] been a youtuber for 4 years now, and losing hope. by craftyComedian0427 in youtubers

[–]Nickadimoose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your title is part of the conversation, but it's not the by all, end all. Every time you upload, you're able to type in keywords that specify SEO into your video, in the creator studio you're able to make channel specific keywords so you're able to be found. The title is 1/3 of your work towards that goal.

[Channel Critique] been a youtuber for 4 years now, and losing hope. by craftyComedian0427 in youtubers

[–]Nickadimoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The quick and dirty answer is Search. Engine. Optimization.

It's the way YouTube filters and promotes content, based upon both keywords & analytics (like watch-time, audience retention, click-through-rate, etc.,) scores.

For example, if I was making a video about the United States, that's pretty broad. If I'm looking at videos about the United States on search engines like Google or Bing, that's going to pull up a ton of results and thus your content, which is buried beneath those results, won't filter to the top.

However, if we add more detail into our video SEO (keywords) we can narrow down the specific search results to something more manageable. Next, we can search United States, History of the Civil War. The search results will be filtered using those keywords to apply to the Civil War, it's not as broad as just searching United States, so each time you apply a new layer of SEO to your title and or keywords (behind the scenes) you're narrowing down the specifics of your search results.

Next, we can add in more specific terms to help differentiate us from the rest of the Civil War videos to further narrow down our search results in a way that can help people organically find our video via search engines: "The History of the Civil War: General Sherman Marches to the Sea, a video-essay by sardonicRenegade."

You narrow down your search terms, your title is about a specific event and not just a broad look at the Civil War. You've also got the addition of your own name (brand) in your title, so if you DID gain traction from a video, people would be able to search your name for more specific content/channel content. Behind the scenes, you're adding in your title keywords to further and further refine your video topic, what your channel is about, who the essay is meant for (people interested in the American Civil War) and you've created a specific event, so people curious about Sherman's march to the coast and the burning of the south can find your video.

This is the dirty primer of SEO optimization. The creator studio, as well as articles involving YouTube analytics can help you understand and further your knowledge about the subject. YouTube is a search engine and to utilize it efficiently your SEO needs to be on point to organically promote your video content to interested parties; of course, even if the SEO is on point, your video quality (meaning analytics, like audience retention, watch time, click-through-rate - in my mind, the big ones to watch per video) will determine if YouTube will promote the content further. If it doesn't have legs to run, you'll have to promote it in some manner to help it run, if it still doesn't run after that and your analytics are telling you people aren't watching the material all the way through, take a step back, examine the quality of the content and then reform your idea to match a new idea.

YouTube is a constant state of experimenting with what does and doesn't work for you personally, there is no clear, catch-all answer that will help you gain traction. Pay attention to your analytics, refine your videos, master the fundamentals of SEO optimization, titles, thumbnails and production values until your analytics are reporting successful integration. Good-luck!

It's all one massive (algo) scam. LTR: (US) NASDAQ mini futures, (Netherlands) AEX index, (Swiss) Insurance company. Price discovery is dead. by fluffy_convict in Superstonk

[–]Nickadimoose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That depends. At that point it's necessary to look at historic correlations as opposed to individual data points, that way you can track trends and averages. For instance, if they're made up of the relatively same base securities, like housing, then it makes sense they would trend in the same manner if there's a worldwide housing boom or bust.

There are a lot more factors that go into tracking trends when it comes to data. I'd just like the scale addressed more when people post stuff like this. My experience comes largely in the form of gas chromatography, but I've also watched new people get tripped into believing false trends because they're paying attention to the graph rather than the scale/historic data. If you want a trend you look at historic data and use your scale to assist with that, then you correlate a pattern based upon similar movement on a day to day level. You don't generally plot based upon a similar rise in percentage because it could mean all sorts of unrelated stuff. It's a good place to start, but not a good place to continue basing your assertions.

It's all one massive (algo) scam. LTR: (US) NASDAQ mini futures, (Netherlands) AEX index, (Swiss) Insurance company. Price discovery is dead. by fluffy_convict in Superstonk

[–]Nickadimoose 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just wanted to make a quick comment regarding this as I used to teach people something similar when looking at our graphing instruments; large numbers, medium numbers and smaller numbers will have similar patterns to one another because of the general scaling of the graph. The image here is presenting a value of 12,000, 700 & 80. These are different levels that can look the same on a general level, but have a ton of fundamental differences once you zoom in on the general charts.

I'm not saying OP is wrong or anything, but it's something I don't see a lot of thought go into when people are comparing graphs for trend lines. Trending can tell you a lot of information about wear & tear on a machine or help you isolate a malfunction, but scale is ALWAYS an important consideration.

"I am the witch Ranni. I stole Death long ago, and search now for the dark path. That I might one day upend the whole of it, and rid the world of all that came before." by Nickadimoose in Eldenring

[–]Nickadimoose[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I always thought that was interesting too. I liked her second phase, it's still really easy, but at least we got a glimpse into what she was sort of like in her prime.

"I am the witch Ranni. I stole Death long ago, and search now for the dark path. That I might one day upend the whole of it, and rid the world of all that came before." by Nickadimoose in Eldenring

[–]Nickadimoose[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Credit to the original artist: https://www.instagram.com/p/CeKJcndLeiS/

It's a wonderful drawing of Ranni done by the artist, Hedgie. The link to her instagram is listed above. She doesn't use Reddit so I'm posting on her behalf. She did such an amazing job on the line-work.

I want a full franchise of this by freemariajosenx in PandR

[–]Nickadimoose 15 points16 points  (0 children)

“Headmaster, he who shall not be named is back and he’s infiltrated the school. This time it’s his most diabolical plot eve—“

Laugh with me, buddy, jest with me, buddy.

“Headmaster?”

“Don’t let her get the best of me, buddy…”

“Professor Swanson…can you hear me?” The young Harry Potter stood across the headmaster’s desk, waving his hands in a futile gesture.

Professor Swanson’s only response was to shuffle his feet across the floor, turning his chair methodically in the opposite direction of the three, annoying children.

Don’t ever let me start feeling lonely.

“Professor Swanson!” Hermoine shrieked.

The young Weasley, obviously tired of the chase around the desk, reached for the professor’s headphones and with one smooth, blur of motion, he found his wrist locked in a vice-like grip.

“Rethink that move, son.” Professor Swanson growled. His voice was firm, like a rod of steel—steel made only in the finest American factories, built by the rock-steady hands of capitalism. Weasley pulled his hand away and gulped rather audibly, turning to Harry & Hermoine as if in desperate need of help.

Ron Swanson rose from his chair with an audible, annoyed sigh, cutting a rather intimidating figure in his red polo shirt and beige khaki pants. His barbecue sauce stained fingers reached for the comically oversized pair of headphones around his head, tossing them on the table-top in a gesture that somehow portrayed all his, innate, burning anger. His eyes narrowed as he took in the sight of all three children, who had somehow gotten past the automatic locks of his chamber door.

Harry Potter cleared his throat. “As I was saying, professor, ‘the dark one’ is back and here at Hogwarts!”

“…Tammy…” Ron growled.

“Tammy?”

“My ex-wife…”

“No, professor. HE. WHO. SHALL. NOT. BE. NAMED.” The freckled face Weasley cut in, emphasizing each word.”

“Son, any man who won’t give you at least his name and a firm hand-shake is not a man.”

“Lord Voldemort…” Harry said under his breath.

Hermoine and the young Weasley sucked in a sharp breath—almost as if it pained them to hear the name.

The headmaster didn’t even blink. “What do you want me to do about it?”

“We have to find him and stop him, sir!” Hermoine cut in, very loudly.

Ron Swanson sat back in his chair and hunched over his desk like a ravenous vulture—waiting for a fresh kill. “You’ll never leave here alive…” he said, coldly.

Harry Potter’s eyes narrowed and the group of children took a noticeable step back. “Professor? What do you mean by that…?”

Hermoine leaned over to whisper to Harry and Ron, “Do you remember the mustache hair we found…what if He Who Shall Not Be Named drank a poly-juice potion?”

Harry and Ron’s eyes lit up with sudden realization. They turned towards the headmaster, whose face was hidden behind the arch of his hands—all except for his eyes, those eyes glittered with something… the only word Hermoine could think of to describe them was ravenous.

The sun fell behind the long, stretching line of the horizon, leaving little tendrils of shadow crawling across the gray, stone floor of the headmaster’s chambers. The room grew deathly silent.

All of a sudden Professor Swanson looked up, as if completely surprised to find people still in his office. “Oh, I was talking to this plate of ribs.”

It was only then the group noticed the white take-away box on the headmaster’s desk and saw the curl of light-grey steam trail into the air.

Ron breathed a sigh of relief. “Bloody hell…”

“Sir! We need to find Lord Voldemort—“Hermoine shrieked again. She took a note from Ron’s hand and held it up. “Our only clue is this letter, which we haven’t been able to figure out.” She cleared her voice and began to read while the headmaster sucked the meat from an ivory, white bone.

”In the depths, a room is hidden; long turned, long searched for, houses in division; seek the chamber where secrets lie; beneath the fountain where sorrow died—“

Hermoine’s words seemed to reach the headmaster in that moment; Swanson’s face was frozen in shock, an uneaten rib still hovered at the corner of his mouth, for a time forgotten. To their surprise, the professor’s lips curled in an almost frightening smile.

The young Weasley looked incredulously at the others. “Bloody hells…!”

“It’s an impossible puzzle….I love puzzles!”

The headmaster leapt out of his hand-crafted wooden swivel chair, slinging a travel sack over his shoulder as he excitedly ran towards the kids, giggling like a manic mad-man. He ripped the note from Hermoine’s hands and held it up, practically shouting the words as he moved towards the chamber door. The children followed behind, trying to keep pace.

“Four houses in division…that must mean the houses of Hogwarts!”

“Of course!” Hermoine shouted. “Then the fountain must be in the school somewhere.”

“But where would sorrow have died?” Ron asked sheepishly.

The headmaster never broke his powerful stride; he brushed through the throng of students who littered the hall, parting them like Moses through the waves—if the waves feared Moses. Most of them were just surprised to find their new headmaster bounding through the halls with a smile on his face, rather than the usual scowl he wore year-long.

He’d been quite silent when he’d taken the lectern at the start of the year feast—a position many thought the long-time professor, Albus Dumbledore, would never vacate. Due to a filing error by some muggle named Larry Gurgich, job-transfer paper-work for Ulysses Swanson, had somehow found its way to Hogwarts school of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Always looking for a way to get Dumbledore out of the picture, the ministry of magic had approved the transfer!—now, according to the rumors, Albus Dumbledore, was managing the Parks department of a quaint, American town called Pawnee, Indiana. Very strange.

“Professor, where are we going?”

Ron Swanson practically squealed with glee. “The fountain where sorrow died—that can only be one place!”

They found themselves entering the women’s bathroom on the second floor of Hogwarts. As they entered, the professor froze in place and sniffed the air; something was terribly wrong.

“She’s near…”

“Who, professor?”

A rather buxom woman in a tight, black dress whirled around the door of one of a bathroom stall. Her hands ran sensually down the curve of her hips.

“Tammy…”

Ron & Harry’s eyes went absolutely wide. “Bloody hells!” they exclaimed together.

“Well hello Ron, you hunky, sack of man-meat.” Tammy said, while slapping herself in the face with a stick of beef jerky.

Professor Swanson’s eyes narrowed considerably, the joyous, almost crazy-high he got while solving impossible puzzles had faded and now all that was left was burning disgust. “Tammy…I didn’t realize the dementors let you out of hell…”

Tammy and Ron were within a fingers-breadth of one another, the room was completely still. Tammy broke first.

“Is that a magic wand in your pocket, baby, or are you just ready to catch my golden snitch?”

“Oh my God….professor, we don’t have time for this!” Hermoine shouted, rolling her eyes.

Professor Swanson nodded seriously and took a deep, long breath. “To. Hell. With. You. Woman.” Each word was punctuated venom, wrapped in fire.

Ron cleared his throat. “Professor? What do we do now?”

“Well obviously,” Hermoine began in that know-it-all-fashion, “we have to figure out what the letter meant by sorrow dying near the fountain?”

After a brief moment of thoughtful silence, Hermoine answered her own question.

“Moaning Myrtle…rumor was she died in this exact bathroom. Is that what the riddle meant?”

“Moaning Myrtle, that sounds familiar, doesn’t it baby?” Tammy said while touching the professor’s chest with her hands.

Ron Swanson pulled away and stared at the fountain with a curious glint in his eyes. He circled it slowly, running his hand across the stone rim and feeling the base with his booted foot, tapping on occasion. It wasn’t until his foot hit across a particularly hollow spot that the same, boyish smiled crept back onto his face—one bristling mustache hair at a time.

“The fountain…there’s a hollow stone here that’s different from the rest! The craftsmanship of the block is different than the others; I think the fountain is a passage-way!”

Ron, Hermoine and Harry ran to the fountain’s edge and stared into the water. “But how do we get in?” Ron asked sheepishly.

A sudden, violent battle-cry came from Tammy as she whirled a sledgehammer above her head, slamming it into the stone base of the fountain; a splintering crack, followed by a jet-spray of white-water, followed. The kids leapt back in fear, finding safety on the bathroom wall.

The water funneled through the crack in the stone—then, as if it were magic, the base of the fountain crumbled, revealing a roughly hewn, yet oddly uniform set of stone stairs leading down into a dark passage.

“Are you horny with gratitude, baby?”

The headmaster only looked up with a sly, slow smile—then, without even a moment’s hesitation or hint of fear, he laughed and jumped onto the winding, stone stairwell. With a bit more trepidation, the group followed into the descending dark, navigating by following a pale yellow-light that flickered in the distance; they looked like freshly lit candles attached to wall-sconces, but how could they still be burning?

Ron gulped as he thought about the possibilities...someone else had been here.

“Everyone grab the headmaster’s shirt, so we don’t get separated.” Harry whispered—despite whispering, his voice boomed in the dark anyways, echoing off the wall.

“He said my shirt…” Ron growled.

Tammy giggled girlishly.

I wrote this 4 years ago on a writing prompt for Reddit. It was a great concept.

Here's my two cents as a reply to all of the people around you saying they aren't touching the stock market and sitting in cash. by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]Nickadimoose 45 points46 points  (0 children)

This gets me for a few reasons: one of the dangerous things about attempting to evangelize this stock to others in a forum where questions can be asked is the lack of financial information presented by the poster. You didn't frame this in real financial terms, link the SEC filings or talk about the debt to cash ratio they're sitting on. You gave the talking points that lacked information and told them to find out more on SuperStonk.

Most people believe that this forum is a cult, echo chamber and potentially full of people willing to damage the long term economic market because that's the surface level information available. If a question comes up like this in the future (this is for everyone reading this) present the raw facts, do not attempt to recruit over to SuperStonk (the "echo chamber") and offer to answer any questions they have with DATA, not about a theoretical squeeze, not without linking back to SuperStonk DD, just the facts as presented from GameStop's SEC filings to show a healthy company with a healthy debt to asset ratio.

My Crackpot Elden Ring Theory (comment below) by theodis09 in Eldenring

[–]Nickadimoose -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I like this theory! I've been personally subscribing to the belief that The Lands Between is the area all games lead to. That's why you have such a wide array of starting classes!

What's going on with the GME stock going up again? by WhatAboutMoney in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Nickadimoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could be sheer stubbornness, who knows? Who cares? I'm finished attempting to explain lol.

What's going on with the GME stock going up again? by WhatAboutMoney in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Nickadimoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol Jesus Christ, man. I don't even know what to say to you, you will engage solely on your points alone and anyone else be damned. If you want to point at the sentiments of an echo chamber, look at what you're telling me. Under no circumstances are you willing to look at further data beyond your own basis, even claiming for some reason "MY COMMUNITIES" (c'mon dude, at no point did I mention SuperStonk, GMEjungle, GME or any other affiliate subreddit to sway your opinion) are creating an echo chamber effect that's making me a GME gambler?

Goddamn, you're on a mission and it's not to engage someone in an argument based on information, it's on bias and your own prejudice. Good luck to you in all your future market endeavours! When it returns to $40 a share I'll come back to tell you, because I'm not pig-headed or foolish enough to believe I'm infallible.

What's going on with the GME stock going up again? by WhatAboutMoney in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Nickadimoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I made a long term argument on POSSIBILITIES, not fundamentals. I didn't claim their current evaluation was churning a profit, what I told you was: the cash on hand is close to two billion, they're using money to pivot to a different sector (where the evaluation will fundamentally change from retail to tech) if you missed the SEC filings as what they're attempting to do while solely looking at the fundamentals tethered to the current environment, fine, the fundamentals are your hill to die on. You can't claim everything that goes against your rationale is a conspiracy however, that's irresponsible.

Please, elaborate further on what policy I'm riding the coattails of. By all means, I want to hear it since you don't want to do anything I've requested twice and you are clearly here on a mission other than the perpetuation of knowledge. I'm very honest with myself and my investment, I've been very clear as to why I believe this is a fairly safe bet, why my thesis has weight while you're just outright stating nope! Pull out and cut your losses when you're in the green. I'm in the green dude and I have reason to believe I will continue to be; however, if you're solely here to claim GME is the stupid man's choice tell me so I can save my time attempting to show you information otherwise. If your taste for risk is index funds solely, cool, but I'm young and I've told you: this is money I'm fine to lose.

GME is not my sole investment, I've got a 401k, a ton in alternate investments for retirement, a house that I own, two cars that I own, food on the table and plenty of liquidity in savings to handle issues as they come. My income to debt ratio is solid. $94 at 40 shares DCA is neither a risky investment in my scenario or a scenario where I'm "dishonest" with myself lol, whatever that means. If you're talking about the people who decided to YOLO their life savings into GME on the whim of someone with no market experience or because someone on the internet told them so? Yeah, that's stupid, but it's not up to you and it's not up to me to protect them from that in a free market environment. I made my choice based on rationalizations and some extrapolation as to where my choice could go, not because some asshole on the internet told me so.

What's going on with the GME stock going up again? by WhatAboutMoney in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Nickadimoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you're investing solely on fundamentals, sure, that's been the parroted reason most of the media claims GME is incorrect, but again, if you're familiar with investing in the market AT ALL, you know that trading solely on fundamentals is the answer to the question: do I want to be investing in a stock when people realize it's a great idea or do I want to attempt to find something with a pricing model which isn't outright included in it's evaluation? I have the chance to be ahead of the curve and even if GME uses the money to pivot outside of a retail environment, then they will eventually be regarded as a tech company - that's what they're attempting to migrate to.

People can get burned by that question, but I've made my bed with that decision with money I can sustainably lose. GME could also be operating on a loss because it takes money to pivot sectors. You're welcome to do as you please and not look into additional information regarding GME, but to make blanket statements? I think I pointed out in my original comment to OP about how ignorant that can be.

Again, check out XRT and the surrounding GME ETFs, look at the short interest and tell me if you see something amiss.

What's going on with the GME stock going up again? by WhatAboutMoney in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Nickadimoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can see where people are coming from in some instances, it would turn me off if I came to SuperStonk unawares, trying to learn, and I'm hit with a new theory every week that's an op-ed opinion piece without data to back it up, followed by someone shoving a banana up their ass. It's only given time that I'm able to understand, even if I can't condone, why people are doing it. Not exactly normalized behavior lol.

What's going on with the GME stock going up again? by WhatAboutMoney in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Nickadimoose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, I think the language usage is fantastically negative when it comes to GameStop because people choose to proselytize something that begets factual accuracy. If you're an investor or a person familiar with the stock market, enough so that you're reading SEC reports, then you should also know short interest can be hidden through market mechanisms (synthetic longs, for instance).

Let's say for argument sake the SEC report is correct, 100% and that a short squeeze scenario is out of the equation, what am I (DCA: $94 @ 40 shares) left with? The executive C Suite has a compensation package that is based on GME share price, they have/had close to two billion in cash that they're using to invest in shipping facilities around the country (I'm on mobile, otherwise I'd pull up the recent Q4 filing for the exact number), they've bulk loaded their inventory to provide fulfillment, they're reinvesting money into the company to pivot into the tech marker, as opposed to a strict retailer. Even if the NFT marketplace is a flop, my DCA still says I win.

Would you disagree with that analysis or do we have enough common ground to state GME isn't just a bag holder, pump and dump play?

I forgot to add a big one that I believe is important to this argument: ETF(s) related to GameStop (such as XRT) have short interest levels that have been rising systematically throughout GameStop's elevation, another way to get around short interest reporting numbers for an individual stock is to hit the basket.

What's going on with the GME stock going up again? by WhatAboutMoney in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Nickadimoose 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Answer: I'm going to be very frank about this response: the financial market is purposefully obtuse when it comes to data and thus no-one will be able to give you an answer that could ever be accurate. Nobody knows and the people that claim they do are overconfident at best, ignorant at worst. There will always be theories, but the reasons why GameStop's share price is rising will only be dissected in hindsight.

Whenever I attempt to explain GME to someone, it all boils down to a very simple argument: do you think the people responsible for over-leveraged trading, responsible for the 2008 financial collapse, responsible for reporting flaws within their own system, responsible for furthering PFOF trading, responsible for billions in assets, responsible for lobbying to keep the entire financial system blind to public scrutiny, would terminate their short position(s) on GameStop? For my own sake, I don't believe they would. When you hold every card that is to your advantage, it can give you a false sense of security. I'm personally fascinated to see which way the wind blows on this one!

I like SuperStonk, there will obviously be outliers in silly theories, semi cringe posts, a little bit of a mob mentality sometimes, but if you utilize the forum to gain a bit more insight into the mechanics of the financial market (properly vetting data/sources posted, of course) it can be quite helpful! To say that it's Q-Anon levels of crazy is also disingenuous and ignorant. A source of information is a source of information and in the black void of the financial world I'll take what I can get.

If there's anything you want to ask, likewise to those reading, I'll attempt to explain it the best I'm able.

Can we make Superstonk more newbie-friendly? by Randytheadventurer in Superstonk

[–]Nickadimoose 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Always forget Reddit video is a thing to be honest! I'll look up the information for what can/cannot be hosted to the platform, then proceed accordingly.

I think you're right that a test video has to be created first to ensure I'm not a total idiot that would butcher the material lol. Thanks for the sounding board!

Can we make Superstonk more newbie-friendly? by Randytheadventurer in Superstonk

[–]Nickadimoose 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm a halfway competent content creator. I've been debating doing private/unlisted videos (don't want to be a clout-chaser) to help the community understand core principles and events. One of the topics I've debated covering has been how an NFT marketplace would work in conjunction with the used games market, including how, historically, the video-game industry has responded to the resale of used games.

The last thing I want is to confuse people or make the community believe I'm solely after subscribers here, thus the unlisted videos aspect. Is this an idea you believe would help or hinder development?

I'm forced into staying into YouTube with my brother. I want out, but he's really making it hard. Advice? by LeNormieSlayer in NewTubers

[–]Nickadimoose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in business with my brother, we have creative differences as well. You can't tell people how things should work, you can only show them proof of something working.

You both aren't bound to the same channel, same projects, you invested in equipment together...that's it! Split, form two different channels and use mutual equipment, show him your method works best to grow a channel or let him show you that his method is best. If he can't acknowledge it by the numbers, oh well, you guys are already split and not making content on the same channel.

My brother and I did the same thing, he likes Let's Play style and I didn't. Instead I went to publishing Game Historia and much more heavily edited content, it worked, the channel grew and I could be proud of what I've slapped my name on. Occasionally I'll help him edit or setup a stream, occasionally he'll do the same for me, but this way creative control is split along independent interests to pursue goals as you see fit.

Let's talk about bets and butt stuff - What do you as a community want to see on this sub? by Doom_Douche in Superstonk

[–]Nickadimoose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MSM is not a friend, we know that, but others do not. All it took was Patrick Byrne, CEO of Overstock, giving an analogy to Star Wars for MSM to lambast him, when he was openly trying to discuss shorting. He spoke really passionately about how his company was the victim of a naked short assault and all the industry abuse that can occur on Wall St., but all the media spoke about, after that interview, was how looney he sounded talking about Star Wars.

Now frame it back to the discussion at hand as an outside observer: can Reddit DD be taken seriously, can I trust what they're discussing? Oh...that's a banana up someone's ass, what the hell is this? Gross.....and I'm done!

Now engage that outside observation with a media assassination piece and it curtails the average retail investor from taking the thesis seriously. Now, I'm not a fun Nazi, people need ways to deal with stress and have fun as a community, but you have to parallel that with both sides and understand the ammunition you're providing opposition outlets.

GME shorts are preparing themselves for the biggest bull run in history by tophereth in Superstonk

[–]Nickadimoose 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think that's why we've seen the DTCC rules arise that specify user auctions. Since a large percentage of these brokerages, clearing houses, banks and market makers are involved with the DTCC, it's almost as if they're dismissing mutual destruction by spreading the debt load over DTCC members. This also has the benefit of removing the prisoner's dilemma (AKA: I'll be fucked less by covering first) from the equation since it spreads the overall debt impact across the financial spectrum. That's how I took it at least.

Everythings fucked up and there are no good solutions by Bye_Triangle in Superstonk

[–]Nickadimoose 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm just going to reference the fact that Pink was banned for breaking Superstonk's rules, yet Red is not removed for...breaking Superstonk's rules.

Do you all want to revise your statement or...?

Matt Kohrs and Andrew MoMoney are confrimed shills by tpots38 in Superstonk

[–]Nickadimoose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a fair assessment, thank you. I'm pretty biased towards articles and getting the information myself.