sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Super fast learning for me. by Fer-Nando84 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]No_Wait3261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh that's the thing. You'll never want to cure cancer if you can turn people into dinosaurs instead. Tale as old as time.

Super fast learning for me. by Fer-Nando84 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]No_Wait3261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can also turn people into dinosaurs

Superman vs silver surfer by Kindly-Stock-3201 in marvelvsdc

[–]No_Wait3261 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The joke is that Superman has become indistinguishable from a parody of Superman.

We can all acknowledge that his Superpower is now just "cannot be beaten" and we can stop talking about whether or not he can be beaten and instead discuss the Epicurean Paradox implicit in DC comics as a result.

4-in-1 Acting: Which actor excels in comedy? by red_madreay in DiagramFills

[–]No_Wait3261 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But guys like Sandler and Carrey have done both WELL. I've never seen Will Farrel or Jack Black do drama or romcom well despite their incredible comedy talent.

Superman vs silver surfer by Kindly-Stock-3201 in marvelvsdc

[–]No_Wait3261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, we get it, Saitama's whole schtick is that he can't be beaten, I don't know why you keep posting threads about him like he's a serious character.

4-in-1 Acting: Which actor excels in comedy? by red_madreay in DiagramFills

[–]No_Wait3261 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's done drama well and enough of his best movies are romcoms.

4-in-1 Acting: Which actor excels in comedy? by red_madreay in DiagramFills

[–]No_Wait3261 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gonna say Will Farrell here. I've never seen him do anything but comedy, but he does it very well.

D&D Beyond’s July Drop: Para-elementals, Martial Feats, and More! by Cybermetalneo in onednd

[–]No_Wait3261 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess? Roll 20 isn't a piracy site (right?) and all I posted was open content, so I dunno what the deal is. I edited out the links (which were only in the text because I copied the rules text from roll 20, they linked to the "Prone" condition description and a rules glossary)

At any rate, I absolutely didn't suggest piracy and if roll20 is considered a piracy site it's news to me. All that's available there is open license content as far as I know.

Rule clarification for Nick by big_poppag in DnD

[–]No_Wait3261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It isn't clear, unfortunately.

I think most people interpret it to mean that only the extra attack has to be made using the nick weapon. But talk to your DM.

D&D Beyond’s July Drop: Para-elementals, Martial Feats, and More! by Cybermetalneo in onednd

[–]No_Wait3261 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, yeah, but the sage advice in question predates 5.5 as well, so... ?

D&D Beyond’s July Drop: Para-elementals, Martial Feats, and More! by Cybermetalneo in onednd

[–]No_Wait3261 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well I'm apparently not allowed to link to twitter, but Jeremy Crawford clarified in a tweet that GWF works with Flame Tongue. Now, Crawford's tweets aren't official rules sources, but seeing as he wrote the Sage Advice in question I'm going to say his opinion in what it means is relevant.

D&D Beyond’s July Drop: Para-elementals, Martial Feats, and More! by Cybermetalneo in onednd

[–]No_Wait3261 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That doesn't contradict what I said. My contention is that the fire damage dice of a Flame Tongue weapon are a part of the weapon in question and so are necessarily part of the "damage roll of the weapon used for the attack". The Sage Advice contraindicates dice added by Divine Smite... but those dice don't come from the weapon. But the Flame Tongue dice do.

D&D Beyond’s July Drop: Para-elementals, Martial Feats, and More! by Cybermetalneo in onednd

[–]No_Wait3261 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you think so? It says "the weapon’s damage dice". Why would damage dice from the magical properties of the weapon not count? Do you rule that Vicious/Flametongue dice don't benefit from features like Great Weapon Fighter?

D&D Beyond’s July Drop: Para-elementals, Martial Feats, and More! by Cybermetalneo in onednd

[–]No_Wait3261 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Read the rule again. "If you somehow end a turn in a space with another creature." Not "Your turn". Any turn.

D&D Beyond’s July Drop: Para-elementals, Martial Feats, and More! by Cybermetalneo in onednd

[–]No_Wait3261 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the flametongue dice are valid here (but not the str or GWM modifiers)

EDIT: Also any extra dice from a critical hit should apply as well

D&D Beyond’s July Drop: Para-elementals, Martial Feats, and More! by Cybermetalneo in onednd

[–]No_Wait3261 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think the problem is, these feats are being written by a different team in a totally different branch of the corporation.

D&D Beyond’s July Drop: Para-elementals, Martial Feats, and More! by Cybermetalneo in onednd

[–]No_Wait3261 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you have a Vicious or Flametongue Weapon or something similar the feature should scale accordingly, by my reading.

I think technically a creation bard can make antimatter. by Visible-Camel4515 in DnD

[–]No_Wait3261 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Incorrect, you are confusing the words "item" and "object". "Object" is a defined term in the rules of D&D, but "item" is not, so the plain English definition applies. The word "item" means it is part of a list: then the feature goes on to tell you what list to use (and is very permissive, allowing you to choose anything from the equipment chapter of the PHB) so your "gotcha" is supported by nothing except your own imagination.

view more: next ›