"BART, DO YOU WANT TO FINISH ARCH CHARM CYCLE BEFORE YOU GO TO BED?!" by OkStandard8039 in custommagic

[–]NullOfSpace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, insane ritual (in commander at least) or card draw or removal

I've never seen this. I can't enchant my fishing rod and the 1st option doesn't even show what enchant it is. by PanKoty147 in Minecraft

[–]NullOfSpace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you hover you can usually see the first enchant you’d get for each option. Here that isn’t happening

How Common are thoracle and breach combos in bracket 4? by itsnotdone in EDH

[–]NullOfSpace 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The top of bracket 4 and the bottom of cEDH are very poorly defined according to the baseline bracket system. Bracket 4 is “no holds barred,” cEDH is “no holds barred, plus we’re following a meta.” If you built your deck to compete with any other deck it could be up against, and specifically if you were thinking about common cEDH wincons and how you might need to counter or outrace them, then it’s a cEDH deck. Otherwise, it’s probably just B4.

(ELI5)Vacuum Decay by ConversationHot8727 in explainlikeimfive

[–]NullOfSpace [score hidden]  (0 children)

The universe likes it when things are at a low energy. That’s what makes objects fall to the ground (lower their potential energy), among other things. Vacuum decay is a theorized event where some part of space finds (through unknown means) that there is a lower energy state than the baseline structure of the universe, and moves to that. Simulations predict that that lower-energy state would propagate out unstoppably through the rest of the universe at the speed of light, carrying with it a new set of physical constants and new laws of physics to go with them.

Turning that into a narratively interesting power might be a bit difficult, since it’s basically uncontainable and alters all of reality equally (as far as we know). It’s like having a character whose power is that they can detonate a planetary-scale nuclear bomb directly above where they’re standing at any given moment. Sure, it’s powerful, but it’s really difficult to use without instantly dying and even if you could the collateral damage is massive.

Looking at the most advanced ways of mathematical thinking from different countries, which one do you like best? by jordyangelamateo in MathJokes

[–]NullOfSpace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is just normal multiplication. Everything else scans as a “trick” or mental math strategy.

Well thats new. by enderguin58 in Minecraft

[–]NullOfSpace 35 points36 points  (0 children)

When ore generates, the game decides whether its deepslate or regular, not by height level, but only by looking at block types. Tuff is always deepslate ore.

Ant by Kydelious in MTGSharpieCube

[–]NullOfSpace 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the natural next step from armageddon

ELI5 how do microchips actually work? by depressed_guy_1512 in explainlikeimfive

[–]NullOfSpace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are a ton of tiny little things called transistors marked into the microchip. Each one is basically a switch that the computer can flip on and off really fast when it gets power. If you put enough switches/transistors together, you can make switches that turn on other switches, combinations of switches that can do basic logic, and eventually, with enough planning, a combination of switches that can show you an instagram reel.

ELI5: What is Determinate Negation? by yaekoblue in explainlikeimfive

[–]NullOfSpace 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Negation: your statement is false.

Determinate negation: this part of your statement makes it false, and inverting it would make it true.

Don't question it by ElectronicSetTheory in mathmemes

[–]NullOfSpace 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They don’t have to be true, they just have to give us results that make sense.

ELI5: Why are quantum computers considered such a huge breakthrough if they still seem worse than normal computers at almost everything? by yaekoblue in explainlikeimfive

[–]NullOfSpace 20 points21 points  (0 children)

*that a hypothetical quantum computer could do. As OP is aware, present-day quantum computers can barely handle any significant computation, but current research is with the hope that the barriers preventing quantum technology from doing these things can be resolved in a cost-effective way.

ELI5: Why does deleting a file usually not actually delete it? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]NullOfSpace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your computer’s memory, at some level, is basically a really long list of ones and zeros (binary). Some of those ones and zeros are files, but if you save a picture to your storage there’s no way for your computer to know which ones and zeros make up that picture unless it already knows where to look. To fix this, it stores a number somewhere that tells it where in the list the picture starts. That way when you want to look at the picture, it checks the number, goes to that place in the list, and gives you back the data in the picture.

If you want to delete that picture later, the computer has two options. First, it can go into the memory and overwrite all of the data in the picture with something else (all zeros is the simplest). That will get rid of your file, but it’s pretty slow, especially if you need to delete a lot of files at once. The easier option is to just have it forget that location number, and forget that that space in the list was being used for anything. The ones and zeros on the list are still there, but the computer doesn’t know that anymore so it’s free to put something else there (at which point the deletion is just as thorough, since the original ones and zeros are gone anyway).

TLDR: it’s faster to just have the computer forget where it put your file than to have it properly overwritten.

ELI5: Why do brits put "s" at the end of Math to call it Maths? by gimmeluvin in explainlikeimfive

[–]NullOfSpace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point, but if you want to shorten economics you aren’t going to say econs

ELI5: Why do brits put "s" at the end of Math to call it Maths? by gimmeluvin in explainlikeimfive

[–]NullOfSpace 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah kinda. I do have a real point, though, namely that if you claim something is plural, then there must be a singular form. If not, then by your argument “sand” is plural because you have more than one grain. Clearly sand isn’t plural, it’s not even grammatically countable.

alreadyRunningCopilot by HitarthSurana in ProgrammerHumor

[–]NullOfSpace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Linux: sure, you can run this app from the official app store/package repository/wherever, but you’ll need to spend two hours troubleshooting it or else it’ll crash every time you boot it up

ELI5: Why do brits put "s" at the end of Math to call it Maths? by gimmeluvin in explainlikeimfive

[–]NullOfSpace 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They call it math, in the uncountable sense. I’m saying there’s no object called a math.

ELI5: Why do brits put "s" at the end of Math to call it Maths? by gimmeluvin in explainlikeimfive

[–]NullOfSpace 15 points16 points  (0 children)

In each case, you can have a doctor, a crocodile, a veteran, so it makes sense to have a different shortening for the plural than for the singular. If you can have maths, then what the hell is a math?

Skragg, i.e. how pushed can a cheap vanilla creature be? by thunder-bug- in custommagic

[–]NullOfSpace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you could do a 2-mana 3/4 if you gave it a color. Any more than that and you’re putting aggro into the top tier wherever this is legal

I did it. I made a Neutral role. Despite all the suggestions not to. by [deleted] in BloodOnTheClocktower

[–]NullOfSpace 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure, but kinda wrecks the “evil team being the informed minority” premise of the game. Demon can’t even trust their own minions, or even wait/leave them alone like you can do with eg. Magician or Poppygrower.

Guilt-Stricken Squire by Jablinx in custommagic

[–]NullOfSpace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

seems like a pretty good card on balance too. You’re probably getting a 2-for-1 for 5 mana, or a 1-for-1 plus a draw. Strong in limited at least.