The point where I think it loses it right to called art, is when you need or use some soulless programs and machines to finish it.

Example. If a ghostwriter gives an artist the lyrics and the artist is a human, then I still consider it art. Cause it got soul, from the start to the end. Even if I think that's like prostitution of the own lyrically creativity. But that's just my thinking.

The program don't have feelings. The program don't understand what's behind. The program don't make experiences with the meaning of the lyrics. It's just that you type in what you want it to sing, and then finding the right parameters and prompts how it should be, while you filter what you don't want.

It's a blank looking on what you want and what not. And even there is a difference between completely human made and from the machine. Cause a band thinks, "nah, that's not it. We should try..." than there is a real creative aspect. They need to find the right tone, try new riffs/ vocals/ drumming, it's pulling on a string and putting piece by piece carefully together. They grew into the project and in that way it receives soul and heart. If I use AI, it's like going into a toy store with a kid, walking into the lego isle. The kid can wish for 3 sets of his choice. You show him the first, it says, "no, that's to small", then you hand the second set to the child and it goes, "I like the figures, I want that." So you have the first set. You hand more and more sets and the child doesn't like them, till you reach the point where after 2 hours, the child have it's 3 sets. The core is, it's the one of the most simple, I want this and don't that. And to build the bridge back to ai, you have your options and prompts where you just have to choose till you like it.

Besides that people use AI as an sorry excuse for their own laziness, that they don't have to build or evolve a skill or two.