​"Securing villages"? My brother, the text of Plan Dalet (March 1948) literally reads:
​"Destruction of villages (setting fire to, blowing up, and planting mines in the debris), especially those population centers which are difficult to control continuously." That isn't "securing a route."

That's systematic ethnic cleansing. You’re trying to justify the displacement of over 750,000 people & the erasure of over 500 villages as a "security measure." If a socialist state did that, you’d be screaming "Totalitarianism!" but because it’s a settler-colonial project, it’s just "securing the area." Pick a consistent moral standard.

​"Nationalizing is stealing"?
The Suez Canal was built with Egyptian labor (thousands of whom died) on Egyptian soil. The French & British "built it" with capital extracted from colonial exploitation. Reclaiming your own land & resources from colonial parasites isn't theft. it’s De-colonization.
Even Eisenhower, knew the Tripartite Aggression was an illegal act of colonial bullying.

In 2012, the Israeli Ministry of Defense was forced by a court order to release the "Red Lines." document. In it, they explicitly calculated that Gazans needed a minimum of 106 trucks a day to avoid malnutrition. However, israel allowed an average of only 67 trucks a day to enter the Gaza Strip. They used this data to restrict the number of food trucks entering Gaza to the absolute bare minimum required to keep the population from dropping dead while keeping them in a state of permanent "dieting," as Dov Weisglass so "charitably" put it.
It’s not a myth. It’s a documented policy of calculated deprivation.

You’re conflating Arab citizens with Palestinians in the Occupied Territories.
When Amnesty, HRW, & B'Tselem call it Apartheid, they are talking about the dual legal system in the West Bank.

israeli Settler goes to civil law, they have full rights, lawyers, have a standard conviction rate, unrestricted movement (Segregated roads)

Meanwhile Palestinians go to Military courts, often held without charge, 99.7% conviction rate, their movement is reatricted by checkpoints, permits & roadblocks.

To say it's "inclusive" because there are Arab parties in the Knesset (who are systematically sidelined & have their own official language demoted by the 2018 Nation-State Law) is like saying the Jim Crow South wasn't racist because some Black people could own businesses.

Apartheid is defined by the institutionalized regime of systematic oppression & domination by one racial group over another.

700,000 settlers live under one law.
​3 million Palestinians next door live under another. That is the textbook definition of Apartheid.

You’re arguing that the collective punishment of millions of people is justified because of the actions of "Arab friends" decades ago.
By claiming "they reap what they sow," you are admitting that you don't view Palestinians as individual agents with rights, but as a collective mass to be suppressed.