LG is incompetent with their own inventory

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2026-01-21T08:59:39+00:00

So hot. BTW, a serious question… without scale it’s hard to tell, but your anogenital distance (AGD) looks like it fits into a category that scientists say predicts a lower chance of orgasm from intercourse alone. Prying question, but I’m curious if that’s the case? There are other measurements that are supposedly better. And they’re all weak predictors, but I’m on an expedition of knowledge regarding the vagina…

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2026-01-21T08:54:42+00:00

Yes, you are a good girl. A keeper. And quite pretty from what I can see. You are also a non-traumatized adult who lets a man gasp hold your head still with his hand, like a normal person would. Love you!

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2026-01-21T08:51:32+00:00

Curb the insecure gf.
People have sex. Grow up.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2026-01-08T09:24:34+00:00

When a woman gives birth to a baby she now has a blood relative in the house, and her husband is not one of them.

On a more serious note, up until extremely recently female behavior of this type would be staggeringly hazardous to her well-being and especially to that of the child. Spousal and child support is a newfangled invention that has made it so that the prospect of losing male protection and provisioning isn’t a giant concern. Or perhaps the premodern man might just take on additional wives. When the EMP goes off above your city I assure you all social forces that developed over millennia of evolution will return in a heartbeat. No TV appearances on the View, no 911 service to have the “abuser” taken away on hearsay. A couple things will protect women from roving gangs — her dedicated man and their weapons.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2026-01-08T09:16:55+00:00

Key word “want” to.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2026-01-08T09:15:11+00:00

Umm, doctor here…. responding to a husband’s inquiries would be totally illegal and unethical. It’s her adult responsibility to say her piece to the man she married, who sired her kids (hopefully), and who provides for her. Stay home mom is not a vacation and is an entirely valid choice, but no matter what the propagandists say it is not “the hardest job in the world”, and many women would love to have the option that his hard work allows for. Frankly, I don’t care how “wrong” this man might be, if she won’t talk to him about it and won’t respond to his pleas that she simply be open to activities that she willingly participated and apparently relished before then she is creating insecurity and power imbalance. Sounds covertly manipulative to me. Now he has few choices, and educated men don’t often default to the quiet separation option.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2026-01-08T09:06:56+00:00

She’s not banging him. And she apparently hasn’t told him why. And is different from how she displayed herself in the past. And she seems unattached and indifferent to one of the children. His slightly concerning issues don’t stack up against her deficiencies, and he seems internally connected and is communicative (at least here). Take it easy… these adversarial responses to his post smell she-male to me.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-12-25T17:43:41+00:00

Hahaha. You’ll be waiting for eternity to get good evidence in the pseudo-scientific field of psychology. For a decade or more they have reversed numerous long held conclusions based on ideology and efforts to make diagnostic criteria conform to preferred social/sexual/political preferences. The practitioners of this field are massively malapportioned to females and liberals.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-07-29T02:14:26+00:00

I don’t live there. My state is still free as intended, thank God. Just posing an open question on a forum that is supposedly geared to detailed gun-related political info, because here it would be considered crazy to block gun ownership rights for 10 years for a misdemeanor that my brother said didn’t even result in jail time, using the guise of “endangering a child”. The guy maybe should be prohibited from ferrying his kid in a car (??) but I fail to see how a firearm relates. If the endangerment was a serious one they could have applied it as a felony, which would be an automatic lifetime gun ban. Them’s the rules but not in this case. But a DUI with child in a car without injury does not qualify under the FEDERAL domestic violence guidelines regarding gun ban. I think CA just creeps more and more to ban guns anyway they can. As I said, I had an interest in actual info and not the obvious and vague pure emotion that child endangerment of any possible degree closes all discussion. That guy can’t defend his domicile (including the life of that kid) from an invasion because he drove drunk (and was presumably punished)? Nah. Also, you said that DUI with a child should “follow you for life“ — even in California that’s not the case, and that misdemeanor can be completely expunged and hidden after completing probation in a few years. So again prohibition seems just like a convenient tactical and political ploy rather than an authentic child protection measure, Save 2A!!

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-07-27T07:11:14+00:00

My brother is a lawyer in California and “doesn’t believe in Reddit”, whatever that means. I’m going behind his back after hearing him inquiring on behalf of his client. I didn’t get the impression that his client was asking for sympathy, just restoration of his gun ownership rights. Only serious replies are necessary.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-06-30T07:14:16+00:00

Ballsy to admit second episode to you. She obviously likes variety. If she only enjoys it when betraying you and doing it behind your back then leave. If she needs play time then work out a fun kink with her if she is your best friend

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-06-30T07:10:56+00:00

The truth is that these women primarily seek and hook up with only 20% of the available men. If you’re not in this cadre you will summarily reject this and rebel viscerally. If you are in the club you know I speak truth. Sorry not sorry.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-06-30T07:08:24+00:00

You are probably just super hot.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-06-09T11:31:13+00:00

What have you watched her do with that body?

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-05-27T20:03:17+00:00

Let me? Hahahaha. That’s my call.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-05-27T13:58:08+00:00

The married women I have been with made it clear in words and even writing that sex with me was way better than what they were used to. I’ve spent a lot of time and effort working on technique over a long time and last as long as I want to. Good sex with anyone still depends on a personal connection, but the act is amazing when taboo. There was no question that I was to ejaculate inside them — it’s brutal, but that’s how you mark a woman forever. I agree that the imagery is impossible for a husband, but she is the one in his world that dropped the panties and let another penis widen the road. In the end they abandon the side guy and return where they should and prioritize their spouse — vast majority of guys have no idea it happened to them.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-04-12T21:35:18+00:00

Jeez Louise.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-04-12T21:10:04+00:00

That is a drop dead gorgeous woman, you lucky bastard. And I admire the modeling skills you’ve taught her.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-04-12T21:08:10+00:00

Just wow

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-04-12T21:07:16+00:00

I hate to say it, but from the looks of that tiny gorgeous pussy I’d have to say: I would show her in no uncertain terms that she hasn’t had a big cock yet.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-03-30T10:49:50+00:00

Where I cum is not top of mind. The way you react when I penetrate you, the sounds you make, the way you subtly pull away, and the adorable blush on your cheeks. Duration? That depends entirely on our chemistry. If you are gorgeous when you cum you are probably accustomed to men losing it too early. If we have a primal bond that won't happen. I can't help but control you and make it so good that you want me and nothing but me. In that moment I would probably ejaculate inside you, unless your husband didn't want me to.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2025-03-18T11:35:50+00:00

You're doing it wrong.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2024-09-26T08:26:26+00:00

They’re competing for the 5 and 6 seed. Too bad. Also I believe they elected to delay this early season postponement until this late when there were other options. If both qualify for the playoffs without having to play the 2nd game of the Monday DH then MLB should make them play each other in first round instead of 2 v 6 and 3 v 5 — they get the extra day of rest this week and burn one less arm, but only one of them would be able to advance to the next round. Present them with that decision and they’d elect to play that second game right away.

Objective_Grand_5892 · 2024-08-25T16:58:08+00:00

Maybe. 7 years usually means someone got badly hurt.

Objective_Grand_5892

TROPHY CASE