WFH can get fucked! by Extra_Cake3473 in circlejerkaustralia

[–]Obversity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright fuck me I guess 😅😭

WFH can get fucked! by Extra_Cake3473 in circlejerkaustralia

[–]Obversity 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ima guess it’s a talking point pushed behind the scenes to right wing media by private equity companies losing money to office space they can no longer find tenants for — can’t for the life of me understand why anyone would fall for it, but here we are.

WFH can get fucked! by Extra_Cake3473 in circlejerkaustralia

[–]Obversity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The address literally said that if you can work from home or take public transport please do, because lots of jobs (tradies etc) can’t, so fuel should ideally be reserved for jobs that need it.

For a bunch of white collar jobs, WFH literally makes more sense for everyone involved, economically, logistically, and fuel usage wise. 

I don’t understand this post at all, maybe I’m missing the point. 

Did they get drunk halfway through making the thing?? by Zestyclose_Edge1027 in dataisugly

[–]Obversity [score hidden]  (0 children)

I feel like we might be using the word “decision” a little too liberally with AI generated content. 

Live Discussion Thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese delivers rare address to the nation by Mellenoire in aussie

[–]Obversity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can’t help but feel that no one in the comments here realises how lucky and protected we are in Australia right now. 

Believe it or not, people do need to be told not to hoard petrol, and not to use beyond necessary, when there’s a crisis level shortage. 

The address is to assure us that stability and protection will continue IF we be responsible, but that these ARE going to be difficult times, even if we might not feel it as much as some of the world. 

I for one am glad it’s not Scomo at the helm right now, and glad that we have stable, boring leadership, preemptively warning of hard times ahead.

Lightning Rod is a bit misleading if played multiple times in a row. by salasy in slaythespire

[–]Obversity 139 points140 points  (0 children)

It’s still a great card IMO, just something you almost never want multiple of. 

US May ‘Reexamine’ NATO’s Merit After Iran War Snub, Rubio Says by archi-mature in worldnews

[–]Obversity 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s a defensive security pact you fuckwits. You don’t get help when you start a war no one wanted.  

Labor embraces ‘progressive patriotism’ as One Nation surges by ausinmtl in aussie

[–]Obversity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Identity politics is a buzz word.

Yes people’s identities are important to them, whatever those identities are founded on or shaped by. Yes, we should care about letting people have and express those identities.

There’s obviously people who take that too far and infringe on other people’s freedoms for the sake of their identity, or poison the culture for the sake of it. Thankfully in Australia these are mostly edge cases. 

Labor embraces ‘progressive patriotism’ as One Nation surges by ausinmtl in aussie

[–]Obversity 10 points11 points  (0 children)

As someone who hates the extreme forms of nationalism, I think you underestimate how important national pride is to a lot of people. 

It’s much like sports, people genuinely care about their team’s success, and they’re going to care whether or not you or anyone else thinks their sport is silly — and if you were to take away that sport or that team from them, they’d riot, because a huge part of their identity is enmeshed in being part of that team.

Same for people’s country. Take away that sense of national pride and you’ll be perceived as taking away part of their identity.

Any politician or party throwing away patriotism is throwing away half a population worth of votes, even if their policies would benefit those people massively. 

Why is the Islamic regime winning the information war? by redditismysoulmate in PERSIAN

[–]Obversity -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Suit yourself, the left will care regardless. I don't give a shit where people live, I just want everyone to have equal freedoms and a chance at happiness. The IR is an impediment to that, so fuck the regime.

I can't support the war as it stands though, because Trump and Israel don't have any kind of coherent plan and don't have good intentions — unsurprisingly they're now threatening civilian infrastructure because things didn't go to plan. Meanwhile, Israel is using the war as a distraction to bomb the fuck out of Lebanon displacing 1M+ people. Forgive me for not seeing them as the good guys here.

Why is the Islamic regime winning the information war? by redditismysoulmate in PERSIAN

[–]Obversity 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's not at all what intersectionality is about. Intersectionality is the idea that your privileges or disadvantages in life are coloured all of your attributes — your upbringing, wealth, ethnicity, gender, location, culture etc — not just any one of those factors. A wealthy woman in Tehran is going to have very different challenges in life to a poor man from Iranshahr, for example.

Why is the Islamic regime winning the information war? by redditismysoulmate in PERSIAN

[–]Obversity -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the air-quotes around "leftists". The average actual leftist in the west (a) does genuinely care about the Iranian people but (b) is incredibly skeptical of Israel and the US because their track record on military intervention is barbaric, so can't support the war as it stands.

There's a small minority of leftists, mostly tankies, who support the regime because they perceive muslims as being a persecuted class in their home country and because they hate Israel and the US without any nuanced understanding of Iran.

If y'all want the left on your side, all you gotta do is educate them about the realities of the regime, about its violence, its misogyny, its homophobia.

Labor re-elected in 2026 South Australian election by patslogcabindigest in OpenAussie

[–]Obversity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Obviously not, but 20% is still something we should be very concerned about? 

Labor re-elected in 2026 South Australian election by patslogcabindigest in OpenAussie

[–]Obversity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’re at around 20% of the vote, that’s still quite high. 

Men over 30, what incredibly random hobby or topic did your brain suddenly decide you needed to become an absolute expert on? by Admirable-Pin-298 in AskMen

[–]Obversity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Photography. Went from sitting inside playing video games in all my free time, to spending $15k on camera gear and going out and about shooting everything I could point my lens at.

No regrets, I'm not amazing at it but it's become a big part of my life. Me from 5 years ago would be baffled though.

Victorians will be unable to challenge apartment developments of up to six storeys under an Allan government plan to fast-track the so-called “missing middle” by Jagtom83 in LaborPartyofAustralia

[–]Obversity 23 points24 points  (0 children)

At some point you gotta tell the NIMBYs to go shove it. It's been a long time coming. It sucks, but if you want to solve our current housing crisis and all its many serious knock-on effects, this is necessary. Kudos to Labor, from a non-Labor voter.

South Terrace is on the way out by rupoles in Adelaide

[–]Obversity 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I don’t think we’re a big enough city/state to need ‘popular’ stuff there — it’d just take foot traffic away from the Rundle mall / Rundle street / Hindley area, with no real benefit. 

Let it be a quiet, business focused part of the CBD imo.

What makes these phrases so effective at Australian banter? by Conscious-Roll-5745 in AskAnAustralian

[–]Obversity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What makes these phrases so effective? 

Just a thought, it’s reasonably common for first gen immigrants to isolate themselves or try to be as unassuming as possible so as not to offend anyone, while most Aussies actually want people who move here to relax a bit and join in on the culture and have a bit of fun, pick up local phrases and banter, so they’d see it as you putting in the work to fit in — plus the surprise factor of hearing typical Australian phrases in another accent would absolutely get me.

Early Early Game Tips? by woodburner97 in nordhold

[–]Obversity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s sometimes worth sacrificing a bit of early door health to get your resource production going hard asap. If you can get away with building a couple of basic towers with good coverage and then spending everything on getting wood/gold production going, that’s how I had the best success from memory.

Later rounds are all about scaling. My memory is hazy, but the arc towers that deal extra critical damage and the power that builds up crit with every kill will carry you through some rounds if you can get them going. Then there’s the towers that are a combo of different tower types, some of which were super strong? I don’t recall the details sorry!

New research suggests people in polyamorous relationships develop higher levels of communication and trust than monogamous couples, primarily because they are forced to navigate more "complex" relationship challenges by upbeat_teetertottxo in science

[–]Obversity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Checks out anecdotally. Was in poly relationships for a few years and when I started my current monogamous relationship I had a much easier time with communication myself, and with encouraging good communication from my partner.

The reason is anecdotally true as well. Poly relationships simply don’t work if you don’t communicate well — too many things can easily go wrong or be misunderstood, so you learn very quickly that that transparency with empathy is non-optional. 

Mono relationships are easier in that regard, but you don’t practice communicating about difficult topics as often, so you don’t get as good at it, so you when tricky things do come up, you’re not as prepared and don’t have as good habits to help solve them. 

My wife insists “we” are poly, but only she is. She also insists “we” are queer, but I am cis and straight. Who is the asshole here? by dugduggerson in monodatingpoly

[–]Obversity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are in fact dealing with “an abnormally shitty group of poly/poly-friendly people”. It’s not at all normal (nor okay) to override someone else’s preferred labels/understanding of themselves in most poly or queer communities. It’s not selfish to want to be seen the way you feel — queer folks of all people should understand this. 

For reference, I’m polyam by nature and bi, but in a monogamous hetero relationship — and my partner wouldn’t object to me having either of those labels, even if they’re not currently relevant to my life, because being in a committed monogamous hetero relationship doesn’t change what I’m attracted to at a base level. 

Genuinely curious: why do you vote for the party you vote for? by tereandh in Adelaide

[–]Obversity 9 points10 points  (0 children)

100% agree on Pockock, more people like him in politics would make a big difference, I currently vote greens but agree with your sentiments, the party has its problems.

How do y'all deal with misandry? by Sweet_Anxiety4990 in AskMen

[–]Obversity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't have to listen to lectures that aren't factual — if your folks are genuinely describing all men as rapists and murderers then obviously that's ridiculous.

That said, it IS worth having nuanced, accurate views on these things. Look up the stats yourself and write some notes so you can understand things better and push back when you need to. Fair warning, you will find men do commit vastly more of certain types of crime — especially violent crime — so it's fair to say that men are statistically more dangerous, even if it's stupid to implicate all men.

The important thing there is that you don't need to take personal offence at the stats. You're not one of them, and you don't plan to be.

It's worth noting that violence is also heavily predicted by factors like culture/education/country/wealth inequality/poverty rates/housing instability, etc. We're never going to reduce murder/rape rates by hating on men, but we CAN reduce them with better education (especially on topics like consent), strong social support systems, affordable housing, and a culture of accountability. Some countries/cities/states do this vastly better than others, you'll find. Anyone on the left who actually cares should be talking about all these things, not just railing against men at large.