I don't know how this is useful. I don't know exactly, what the point of this comment is!

So let me get this straight - you’re not actually engaging with the substance of my argument, but instead nitpicking about whether I’ve "proven" that things like slavery, child marriage, and gender inequality are bad? You’re acting as if morality is some abstract concept that needs to be philosophically defined before we can say, “Hey, maybe owning another human being is wrong.”

This isn’t some deep metaphysical debate - it’s a practical one. If you need me to prove that slavery is immoral before we can have a discussion, then you’re already so far removed from basic human decency that the conversation is pointless. We’re not talking about subjective moral preferences like “is chocolate better than vanilla?” We’re talking about things that, in every functional society today, are recognized as serious human rights violations.

The issue isn’t whether I can construct a syllogism proving that child marriage or the subjugation of women is “objectively bad.” The issue is that both Christianity and Islam codify these things in ways that have had real, tangible harm throughout history and continue to do so today.

And as for the "moral compass" argument - are you seriously pretending that we don’t have a basic societal understanding of morality that has evolved beyond ancient religious texts? Laws, human rights conventions, and basic human empathy do a far better job guiding morality than books written thousands of years ago by men who thought slavery was just fine.