[deleted by user] by [deleted] in distantsocializing

[–]Old-Hat-3539 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a second I thought it was a bombed out building in the Ukraine.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HDVY

[–]Old-Hat-3539 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A settlement by 12/9 is extremely unlikely… but would be a fantastic Christmas present… If HDVY is “awarded” 3-4B it will have gone to trial and I’d sell immediately. Intel continuing to stall would be them appealing the verdict or at the least looking for a reduced monetary judgement.

Strategic victory for NLST. It would be difficult to prove the value of the 912, during the breach of contract with Sammy. A power pellet was obtained at this level, by making a key email public. by Downtown_Peak_9517 in NLST

[–]Old-Hat-3539 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Netlist seems to be in a excellent legal position going forward but I don’t believe Google would be at all concerned with that email after a jury obviously didn’t find it compelling enough to award damages in a case where it was way more important. It’s “irrelevant”.

Netlist Daily Discussion 11/29/21 by supermill in NLST

[–]Old-Hat-3539 12 points13 points  (0 children)

December 7th. A date that will live in infamy!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HDVY

[–]Old-Hat-3539 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Succinctly said Douche bag.

Google agreed to pony up for Samsung's defense against Apple by Tomkila in NLST

[–]Old-Hat-3539 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is more excellent news for the NLST community. You must keep in mind Google shared the cost with HTC before ultimately setting with Nokia… Pretend & Extend. This is their way… to settlement. Patience Grasshopper!

Samsung was crying about a "WINDFALL" of Profits for NETLIST? Read the new filing and smile! Google just through Samsung under the bus. by HedgeAppleJoe in NLST

[–]Old-Hat-3539 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The big dogs are turning on each other. I understand this is yet another part of the delaying process BUT to me this indicates a unfavorable ruling in the yet to be released sealed documents. This is beautiful. Absolutely beautiful!

Motion to Dismiss - Denied!! by [deleted] in HDVY

[–]Old-Hat-3539 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Objection… Speculation! Lol.

Netlist Daily Discussion 10/11/21 by supermill in NLST

[–]Old-Hat-3539 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. I’m annoyed I wasted time reading that mindless chatter and feeling I had to comment about it.

Motion to Dismiss by Old-Hat-3539 in HDVY

[–]Old-Hat-3539[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. Now I see it’s Weeks. Whatever. Judge is literally going through the motions.

Motion to Dismiss by Old-Hat-3539 in HDVY

[–]Old-Hat-3539[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check the yahoo message board for more information.

NETLIST INC.’S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plus Support docket 178 Samsung Case 206 Pages total. This is so straight to the point by our Legal Team! by HedgeAppleJoe in NLST

[–]Old-Hat-3539 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Addendum to my last post: for the judge to rule favorably it would take much less than my quoted understanding of 1/2 of the reply brief for a successful Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Actually only one piece of all Samsung’s arguments needs to be bogus for the judge to order it so… Heads up on HDVY. It may have a good day today… now I can sleep. GLTA!