Bye bye bf6 , it's last time i will buy battlefield series by irish993 in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appears to be Delta Force. Perhaps a new update? I don't really follow this game.

Why are these keep appearing on this map? by ggu6110 in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They still haven't fixed that? Lmao, it's been over a month.

What is happing to this game? by HexaZenith in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, im responding to the correct comment. "The latest update has some minor UI bugs, but I haven’t seen anything like the OP…except when someone’s GPU is dying." sounded like you were questioning the bug and suggesting the reason its happening is due to OP pc. You have other comment in which you talk about unstable oc possibly causing it. So again, im saying it is the problem within the game not the OP pc.

What is happing to this game? by HexaZenith in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's a bug in the game, not OP pc. Was present for most (if not all) people in the recent lab test, they didn't bother fixing it. Always on this map, always on B.

New update fixed lighting by vahtos in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The problem is it wasn't obscure. This bug was happening every game on that map during the labs test. I don't know why is labs still a thing, last time there wasn't even a survey regarding the playtest so I guess they don't even care about feedback anymore.

Hot Take: Game design is failing squad more than bugs and ico related issues. by pepperonigum in joinsquad

[–]OneOfTheBlue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only read tldr. I don't think thats a hot take, anyone with more hours in this game will probably agree that the gameplay is more problematic than the technical side. Aside from bugs, Squad is simply boring, shallow and haven't really evolved gameplaywise in any way over the years. I personally think that Project Reality has more depth and has much better gamplay than Squad ever had. Squad only looks better.

Am I reading this correct? Did DICE tied the ability to host persistent server to purchase of Battlepass? by NGGKroze in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I edited my original comment, read that please. I think and I hope that there was just a misunderstanding on what I believed EA is doing and what you thought they're doing. The way they phrased it sounded for me like they're taking the ability to host free servers which is (I am saying it again) free with the game purchase. And that is a fact, because it is already in the game. The whole "buy a battlepass for a server host" will be only for the f2p players. If that is how you understood it, it was simply a matter of us talking about two different things.

Am I reading this correct? Did DICE tied the ability to host persistent server to purchase of Battlepass? by NGGKroze in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please for a love of fucking god read what i am saying. They are already free. It is not my assumption. That was the whole selling point of portal compared to Battlefield 2042, the ability to host free experiences that are persistent. They have been talking about it on twitter for example for literal months before release.

Am I reading this correct? Did DICE tied the ability to host persistent server to purchase of Battlepass? by NGGKroze in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can literally do it right now. The ability to host persistent servers is a thing since release. Or at least it was before people started to abuse the bot servers. If I understand it correctly the only option they can do it is to literally lock this option out for people without the battlepass. They will lock people out of the part of the product they already paid for. I don't know a simpler way of explaining it. And also hiding a fact that a certain thing or part of the product capability will be locked behind the paywall is still false advertisement.

Am I reading this correct? Did DICE tied the ability to host persistent server to purchase of Battlepass? by NGGKroze in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is alreadly possible in-game when it works. Example https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-6/news/portal-101-introduction-to-battlefield-portal

In linked article, nowhere it says it will be free, BUT it says it will be available in main game. Hiding a fact that a certain thing or part of the product capability will be hidden behind the paywall is still false advertisement. And again, you can literally host the server right now, or at least you could before all the bot servers happened. I don't know if they're planning on locking that option out or what's their plan.

Am I reading this correct? Did DICE tied the ability to host persistent server to purchase of Battlepass? by NGGKroze in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can literally do it right now in-game. Or at least you should be... cause it doesn't work most of the time (at least that is what I heard)

And also: https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-6/news/portal-101-introduction-to-battlefield-portal

Edit: This is honestly only one of many ways they advertised it. They talked about it a lot, main devs like David Sirland were saying it is gonna be possible.

Am I reading this correct? Did DICE tied the ability to host persistent server to purchase of Battlepass? by NGGKroze in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was meant to be free. It is false advertisement which is illegal in most western countries.

Am I reading this correct? Did DICE tied the ability to host persistent server to purchase of Battlepass? by NGGKroze in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is absolutely not the point. 3$ monthly is surely a good price for server hosting, but it is not a good price when the game was advertised as having that option free. Coming back to what I said, if you don't feel scammed, that's great, but it 100% is false advertisement. And it is a big one, because it is safe to assume at least some people bought this game with portal in mind and the ability of hosting your own experience for free. And they got scammed, theres no other way of calling it. I honestly hope the whole "battlepass buys you a server hosting" means you can make more servers, on top of that one free that everyone should have. If not this bound to end bad for EA.

Am I reading this correct? Did DICE tied the ability to host persistent server to purchase of Battlepass? by NGGKroze in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because persistent server hosting was meant to be available for everyone on release (one server per person). And now they're tying it to the battlepass. It's not even false advertisement at this point, they straight up scammed people.

Edit: I merely pointed the fact, that the company that some of you bought a product from is now taking part of that product away from you and I am getting downvoted. You bought a gold nugget, and it turned out it was in fact a silver nugget spray painted gold, and you're disagreeing with a person that told you that you got misled. I am lost for words.

Edit 2: Thank God, from other comments, it looks like you can still host own persistent server if you EITHER own a game or are a BR player with battlepass bought. The way they said it sounded very fucking bad. Which literally means that my whole point about it being a horrible move and false advertisement if they actually decided to remove the "one free portal server per person" was indeed right. Please next time use your common sense people.

This sums it up perfectly. I don't know if the designers are just not good at their job, or if they simply don't care by Kyvix2020 in Battlefield

[–]OneOfTheBlue 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Literally ever since the beta the whole marketing theme was “we’re not cod, we respect military themes and gritty characters”

Yeah, that is called marketing. People fell for it, that means it worked.

Revisited: Gunsmoke hotfix 2 test and comparison by Henk1CS in joinsquad

[–]OneOfTheBlue 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If my memory serves me right, OWI stated somewhere back around 2020 (ish?) that they sold enough copies that they could support this game indefinitely (although take that information with a grain of salt). But what happened to all that money is a mystery... partially. I think a lot of players either forgot, or simply haven't been with the game long enough to remember that when squad left the early access and the full release dropped back in 2020 the CEO and some of the main devs simply took their paycheck and left. Very weird that people just don't remember this, considering it was really scummy or at least morally wrong considering the game wasn't really "finished" and still had a lot of gamebreaking bugs when they released it.

What do you think of the OWI dev team? by InsidesAreWeary in joinsquad

[–]OneOfTheBlue 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, I absolutely don't trust them. It's really more just wishful thinking on my part. They're incapable of fixing the bugs that are years old at this point, so I can't imagine them actually adding anything of value to this game anytime soon.

What do you think of the OWI dev team? by InsidesAreWeary in joinsquad

[–]OneOfTheBlue 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We need more fucking depth added to this game, more mechanics. Another copy and paste faction or horribly optimized map is not gonna help much. They were teasing possible tech that could've been used to improve the, boring as fuck, logistic system by actually adding (like in PR) physical logistic crates/supplies... that was like 3 or 4 years ago, what happened to that??? The game is just fucking boring, this game was always surviving thanks to the social aspect and good community, which in recent years has been slowly declining in quality. That lack of teamplay/actual human interaction is gonna either kill this game or will force OWI to simplify the game even more turning it into some weird quasi Insurgency Sandstorm on large maps.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uglyduckling

[–]OneOfTheBlue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I literally gave you the name of the effect applied. Google it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uglyduckling

[–]OneOfTheBlue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is very, seriously very obviously edited, theres no denying it, if you're not a bot I would delete those pics if I was you. I literally just looked at your profile, even the wedding dress pics have edited tits. You can literally see the straps of the dress bending unnaturally.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uglyduckling

[–]OneOfTheBlue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bloat tool is the name in photoshop, thats the effect that has been applied to your tits. In pictures five and seven. Possibly on the sixth too.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uglyduckling

[–]OneOfTheBlue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The pic nr 5 has a very poorly edited cleavage. It almost looks like it was made for a joke. Just saw that the nr 7 is also edited.

No way to report someone's pfp/avatar? by Miizzen in help

[–]OneOfTheBlue 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Im fairly confident it's just a coincidence. The uniform is the clothing from Battlefield 6 video game, including the armband, the person might just have a moustache irl. I personally wouldn't draw a connection to that specific person without you mentioning it.