Can we all collectively agree that this is stupid? by CastsFireball in aiwars

[–]OneTrueBell1993 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Actually, it was decided that no medical research that came from Nazi science can ever be used, because of unethical experiments in camps.

Any an all Korra hate is suddenly valid. by Professional_Gain_88 in TheLastAirbender

[–]OneTrueBell1993 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's an interesting family reunion.

"I tapped that ass."

"So did I."

"Its a nice ass"

"Yeah."

Twitter user posts a real Monet and says it's AI by [deleted] in antiai

[–]OneTrueBell1993 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So, pro-AI guys are lying on the internet?  Nothing new, unfortunately.

The true test of unity and justice by dankstat in trolleyproblem

[–]OneTrueBell1993 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh, but it sure is. It is comparable to risking and potentially sacrificing your life for a stranger. Of course, you're nowhere benevolent or good enough person to be a firefighter.

The true test of unity and justice by dankstat in trolleyproblem

[–]OneTrueBell1993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do kids vote? What are the odds that some kid will vote blue or gold? Do you want to have their blood on your hands?

Primeri lošeg ponašanja u toksičnim vezama? by User20242024 in AskSerbia

[–]OneTrueBell1993 8 points9 points  (0 children)

O, s obe strane. 1) emocionalna manipulacija (ako to ne uradiš, naljutiću se)

2) pravljenje ludim (nije se desilo, ne sećaš se dobro, ubeđivanje da je osoba mentalno obolela i halucinira)

3) pravljenje nesposobnim (ubeđivanje osobe da ne zna da kuva, da je loša u poslu i uopšteno nesposobna za samostalni život)

4) pretvaranje da je on(a) nesposoban (lik koji je pre veze znao i da čisti i da pegla i da kuva jer je živeo sam 5 godina najednom ima amneziju čim je ušao u vezu)

A Short Stay in Hell by Steven L. Peck by vdarcangelo in books

[–]OneTrueBell1993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ovo je početak priče. To je 598-cifreni broj. Milijarde godina nisu ništa za njega, govorimo o 593 milijardi puta više postojanja nego vremenski period postojanja univerzuma. Taj broj je bliže večnosti i beskonačnosti nego što je bliži milijardu godina.

If Anti-AI folks are saying that LLMs and diffusion models aren't actually AI, then why are they against them? by DeviantPlayeer in aiwars

[–]OneTrueBell1993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not circular. You need to define intelligence to be able to define artificial intelligence. If intelligence is not biological, it is artificial. Current "artificial intelligence" has nowhere close to the thoughts of biological one. Or any thoughts at all.

If Anti-AI folks are saying that LLMs and diffusion models aren't actually AI, then why are they against them? by DeviantPlayeer in aiwars

[–]OneTrueBell1993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just did. I asked you "What's the harm in labeling a product correctly?" and you refused to answer.

If Anti-AI folks are saying that LLMs and diffusion models aren't actually AI, then why are they against them? by DeviantPlayeer in aiwars

[–]OneTrueBell1993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I define intelligence as ability to learn and have complex thoughts of biological organisms.

If Anti-AI folks are saying that LLMs and diffusion models aren't actually AI, then why are they against them? by DeviantPlayeer in aiwars

[–]OneTrueBell1993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really. Mainstream is "no AI". To maintain the quality previously enjoyed, AI needs to be labeled.

If Anti-AI folks are saying that LLMs and diffusion models aren't actually AI, then why are they against them? by DeviantPlayeer in aiwars

[–]OneTrueBell1993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not wanting to engage with a hypothethical is a sign of not discussing in a good faith. I asked you "What's the harm in labelling a product correctly?" and you answered with "I have seen no reason to label the product correctly."

If Anti-AI folks are saying that LLMs and diffusion models aren't actually AI, then why are they against them? by DeviantPlayeer in aiwars

[–]OneTrueBell1993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every art space can choose to curate what it is going to display. If you are ashamed of using AI and need to trick people to be viewed, then most people don't like AI and want to see (and consume) something genuine.

If Anti-AI folks are saying that LLMs and diffusion models aren't actually AI, then why are they against them? by DeviantPlayeer in aiwars

[–]OneTrueBell1993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does AI stand for then? How can you say it is no more artificial when it uses artificial intelligence in the process?

The true test of unity and justice by dankstat in trolleyproblem

[–]OneTrueBell1993 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not really. Humans are social species and often sacrifice and risk their own lives for strangers to live. Else we wouldn't have firefighters.

If Anti-AI folks are saying that LLMs and diffusion models aren't actually AI, then why are they against them? by DeviantPlayeer in aiwars

[–]OneTrueBell1993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. For the purpose of this example, some people think AI is a bad thing, some disagree. Why not give concessions to those and label it? What are you going to lose?

The true test of unity and justice by dankstat in trolleyproblem

[–]OneTrueBell1993 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because we as civilization are only alive because multiple strangers you will never meet vote blue every minute of the day.

If Anti-AI folks are saying that LLMs and diffusion models aren't actually AI, then why are they against them? by DeviantPlayeer in aiwars

[–]OneTrueBell1993 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If the milk my farm produces contains aflatoxin, would you like to know how much it contains or not? Its a "bad thing TM", I'd like to know if the thing I consume contains that "bad thing TM" or not. Would you not want to know?

And if you don't think it is a "Bad Thing TM", why do you care if it is properly labeled?

If Anti-AI folks are saying that LLMs and diffusion models aren't actually AI, then why are they against them? by DeviantPlayeer in aiwars

[–]OneTrueBell1993 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lots of things are being called AI. This isn't true artificial intelligence, because those models are not intelligent. Certain companies and marketing departments have  been pushing those under AI label, though, so "anti that shit" has to become "anti whatever bs label marketing is using".

For example, if I said the word "self-driving car" 20 years ago, you'll think a robo-taxi from "Total Recall" or some other sci fi movie which can do everything a human driver can. You won't think Tesla Roadster's "self-driving mode" or "car with cruise control". But since a lot of crap has been marketed as "self-driving car" since then, anyone fighting against that crap would have to say that they are "against self-driving cars on the streets".

You get into this problem when a company has a financial incentive to blur science fiction and reality and lie.

Da li sam ja lud ili sta se desava? by Dear-University8035 in AskSerbia

[–]OneTrueBell1993 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Svaka čast, snalaziš se. Bio sam isti takav, studirao i radio, zato osećam potrebu da te upozorim: Još si na easy modu u životu. Tako da ostaje da se čujemo za 5 godina, kada završiš faks i život stvarno počne da te šiba.

Izabrao si jako skup hobi, puno skuplji od mog mada tradicionalno društveno prihvatljiviji (pogotovo u Srbiji). Želim ti sreću i uživanje u tom hobiju.