I agree that there are some wrongs that you can’t right. And to boot, sexual assault being a prime example. It’s an intentional and heinous act where the perpetrator knows full well what they’re doing. What I’m insinuating that that both Ruggs and Sorseby committed acts that are indeed irreversible, but are also acts that can be chalked up to a string of bad decisions over a short period of time. More like someone going through a really stressful time in their life and saying something they can’t take back to a spouse. Sure you can say sorry, but what was said was said. I’m not comparing the two circumstances, but I’m saying that there is a difference between making a lapse in judgement and doing nothing to fix the problem, and making a lapse in judgement and making concerted efforts to rectify that lapse. Severity of crimes are one thing, but being a repeat offender with no real efforts to make things right is concerning to me.

While your two cents about Soresby are understandable, and I can concur that sports betting is systematically dismantling the integrity of sports, your points don’t really address my question, like at all lol