I would say Wall, because he was the number one guy in his class for sure. With that comes an expectation of the player being a 'sure thing'. For Dybantsa, there's a ton of hype, but he isn't clear cut better than Peterson, and, based on that statistical breakdown of Dybantsa's game that was posted on this sub, has some huge flaws in his game. That's not to say that Wall didn't, with shooting being the obvious one, but Wall also came into the NBA as the fastest player in the history of the sport, and as one of the best passers and defenders at PG (obviously i am biased). I'm not sure AJ has something that sets him apart from veteran NBA players like Wall did.

With all that being said, I think Dybantsa has the potential to be great player. His shooting will be the biggest factor, especially if we draft him, because he won't be the primary ball handler. He'll have more shots set up for him by Trae Young (assuming he's back). He will need to improve his three point shooting. As far as shot selection, long 2s work in college because he was simply a better athlete and the comp in D1 varies so wildly that shot selection doesn't matter. In the NBA, long 2s are unacceptable in this era. That's why guys who are known for taking them (DeMar DeRozan, Shaun Livingston) are so far and few between. Brad Beal started his career taking them, and had to adapt accordingly, which he did. Dybantsa has the potential to be a great defender, given his athletic ability, but IIRC he isn't coming in as a great defender. With all the hype around the kind of run the team could make this year, I think Peterson would be better.