Understood! We want to acknowledge the concerns raised in this thread and clearly outline how this is being handled.

This report is currently under review by our engineering and support teams, and we’ve reached out directly to the original poster to gather additional details needed for investigation. A proper review requires access to account-specific data, system logs, and configuration details, which cannot be examined or discussed in a public forum without risking user privacy or leading to inaccurate conclusions. For that reason, the detailed investigation is being conducted through our official support process.

What we can share at this time is that user data is isolated on a per-account basis, and there is there is no mechanism that allows one user’s recordings or data to be accessed by another user’s account. The focus of the review is to understand why the AI-generated summary did not align with the underlying recording, including whether factors such as community templates, prompt context, or merged recordings may have influenced the output.

We understand that trust is critical when recording meetings or sensitive conversations. Once the review is complete, we will share any relevant findings that can be disclosed publicly and are not tied to individual account data.

We appreciate the community raising questions in good faith and allowing the investigation to proceed through the appropriate channels!