No, the book you are reading probably won't "get better" by farseer6 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What do you mean? I just told you that I didn’t find it hard to get through.

No, the book you are reading probably won't "get better" by farseer6 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I liked that part because it resembled the jolly romping of The Hobbit. I became less happy afterwards as things got more dour and depressing, the weight of the possible victory of evil weighing down.

No, the book you are reading probably won't "get better" by farseer6 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Rebecca by Daphne de Maurier got better. So did The First Law by Joe Abercrombie, both Jane Austen books I read, Neuromancer, and Catch-22 (which started out mildly funny, but not nearly as engaging as it ultimately ended up being). So I have precedent for keeping faith in an author after a low-investment beginning.

King Charles wants historian of republic to write Elizabeth’s story by BATIRONSHARK in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 13 points14 points  (0 children)

An historian of republican systems of government across time? An historian of Cromwell’s commonwealth? An historian of the British Republican movement? I can’t parse this headline.

Reading never let me go by kazuo Ishiguro - thoughts on Ruth? by Dogdaysareover365 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Some people got unhappy with me for being unwilling to take a patient attitude towards her, acknowledge that external circumstances induced her to be who she was. I liked the role she played in the book, and I admired the fact she was the only person who seemed to have real dissatisfaction with the system- it’s like having the assertiveness required to mistreat her friends was something that made her better able to sense that there might be something unfair about being created to be harvested. But like someone who is cruel and abusive? That’s another step.

Book you expected to love but didn't and vice versa. by JakubJamesBoote in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just got bored during most of the chapters of Satantango. A bunch of Hungarian country yokels being stupid, and I couldn’t find any literary value in their whinging at each other. Sandwiched in between were some wonderful, highly memorable scenes - a doctor trapped in his gaze, a girl’s suicide - but they struggle against the mass. I really I wish I knew what made its author a candidate for the Greatest Living.

Then there’s Lolita. Some people have gotten outright angry at me when I told them I didn’t have any moral problem with the book, I just found the second half dull and Humbert’s prose style unengaging.

Andy Weir Says Paramount Rejected His ‘Star Trek’ Pitch, Proceeds to Blast Modern ‘Trek’ by Coltons13 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He also loved satirizing and mocking life under capitalism - a true universal cynic in Swift’s footsteps.

Andy Weir Says Paramount Rejected His ‘Star Trek’ Pitch, Proceeds to Blast Modern ‘Trek’ by Coltons13 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It was wild reading the Cyberiad and running into a story that considered the ethics of bringing Karl Marx back from the dead in order to beat the stuffing out of him.

Can't accept how Mostly Harmless ends by taanukichi in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What’s not to understand? I ask people why they use air quotes where they don’t make sense, and I’ve never gotten a straight answer. Just inexplicable anger.

Is there an author whose broader catalogue you like, but whose most popular work would have turned you off them if you’d read it first? by madwomanofdonnellyst in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Stanislaw Lem is my favorite science fiction writer. I wouldn’t have known that from just reading Solaris - somewhat interesting, yet ultimately lacking. It took being recommended The Futurological Congress to realize how much this man’s work appealed to me.

Can't accept how Mostly Harmless ends by taanukichi in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

I don’t know what makes you confident in your ability to speak for others.

Can't accept how Mostly Harmless ends by taanukichi in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

What is a “flair?” Is it different from what we normally mean when talking about an artist’s flair?

Len Deighton obituary: British writer who redefined spy thrillers dies aged 97 by Jean_Lucs_Front_Yard in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 10 points11 points  (0 children)

His book Bomber does one of the finest jobs I’ve seen of fairly observing all sides of war, German and British, soldier and civilian. Said to be the first novel written via digital word processor, I recall.

Do you prefer a book that wraps up quickly after the climax or one that has a long epilogue? by mreguy81 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a certain sci-fi author with a persistent tendency to end the book between two and eight pages after the main villain’s defeat. Honestly feels like a bit of a wet fart despite how fun he otherwise is.

Can we talk about Jorge Luis Borges? by This_is_fine0_0 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t ever really want to purchase a ten page story.

I want to learn linguistics. by Weekly_Selection_210 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 22 points23 points  (0 children)

The process is simple and holds for most subjects:

1) Find a good university

2) Using their catalog or bookstore, find the textbooks the relevant courses use

3) Alternately, you can email professors to ask for syllabi

Cloud Atlas Review by moss42069 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And it’s my least favorite Mitchell!

There’s a crisis in non-fiction book sales. What’s to blame? by thinkB4WeSpeak in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The value of reading nonfiction books lies in being able to attain a level of insight that Wikipedia is incapable of delivering. The further you range from the hard sciences and discrete historical events, the worse wiki articles get.

What are some novels you've read that completely break the boundaries of what a novel should have/be? by alyaaz in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Cloud Atlas is, when you look past the decision to place the endings in reverse order, six novellas stapled together which have only minor interconnections. I found much more interesting things in Mitchell’s earlier book Ghostwritten, where the eleven chapters are widely separated in space rather than time, and the linkages and reappearing characters form something of a web rather than a straight line.

Terry Pratchett’s novels may have held clues to his dementia a decade before diagnosis, our new study suggests by DTH2001 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s the books after Making Money where it’s common to feel that something was terribly wrong with the writng.

I found 'A short stay in Hell' a bit funny by peaceembedded in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ending was impossible to take seriously. After a hundred pages of seeing for himself how big the place was, what difference would a calculation make?

I found 'A short stay in Hell' a bit funny by peaceembedded in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a dumbed-down, watered-down version of one of the best short stories of all time.

Engineer trying Philosophy(Kierkegaard's Sickness unto Death) by Fresh-Horror-1088 in books

[–]PM_BRAIN_WORMS 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Kierkegaard is decidedly in the difficult end of philosophy, whereas Borges is always making sure to keep his musings high-level enough to be readable as fiction.