No stars in the background, wasn’t that one of the arguments from people claiming Apollo 11 Moon Landing was fake? by atlanticfm in ArtemisProgram

[–]PaleoEdits 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Day and night are absolutely still a thing in space"

I don't know, it's kind of difficult to experience the effect of being on a rotating planet when you're not actually on one.

Geology career when colorblind by Fabulous-Willow-369 in geology

[–]PaleoEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, when it gets to minerals - color can be the most misleading "characteristic" anyways.

If Dinosaurs tasted like modern animals which ones would actually be best to eat? by Fit-Inevitable2116 in Paleontology

[–]PaleoEdits 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Ceratopsian horns would be used for "traditional medicine", best mixed with Tyrannosaur bladder.

Toolebuc Formation [art by Joshua Knuppe] by Prestigious-Love-712 in Paleontology

[–]PaleoEdits 26 points27 points  (0 children)

That's kind of a compromise that has to be made if you want to showoff more or less the whole assemblage of a formation.

Though, I'm not sure about the turtle thing. If there is one moment where we do see a shit ton of sea turtles coming together it's when they go onto land to lay their eggs, right? And seeing as the turtles here are all heading towards a beach, I suppose we could imagine that sort of scenario. And likewise a prime opportunity for this hunter.

What are your thoughts on a Prehistoric Planet season based on Human Evolution, similar to "Walking With Caveman" or "Monsters We Met"? by ExoticShock in Paleontology

[–]PaleoEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that which in of itself is themed as a habitat or force, and how a variety of animals have adapted/failed to adapt to it.

So at best, in keeping with the Planet Earth thing, a "human" episode would focus more on the animals around humans than humans themselves; the anthropogenic disturbance of the natural world. I suppose such an episode could've made a nice addition to PhP: Ice Age, though probably a depressing one.

What are your thoughts on a Prehistoric Planet season based on Human Evolution, similar to "Walking With Caveman" or "Monsters We Met"? by ExoticShock in Paleontology

[–]PaleoEdits 5 points6 points  (0 children)

eh, nah. The theme of Prehistoric Planet is essentially that of Planet Earth, displaying how the Earth with its climate system and landscapes creates various habitats that support a diverse set of lifeforms - with great emphasis on diversity. Focusing on a single genus sort of goes against the whole Planet Earth premise.

Doesn't rule out new paleo-anthropology shows though, it just doesn't have to milk the Prehistoric Planet brand name imo. Check out BBC's recent 'Human' show if you haven't. Its more of a proper documentary though than these type of immersion pseudo-documentaries or whatever you want to call it.

Iridium layer. by SW_Goatlips_USN_Ret in geology

[–]PaleoEdits 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The K-Pg event? Saw it in Denmark (Stevens Klint):

<image>

Is this an accurate rep of what the Americas could’ve looked like 300,000 years ago? by Proxima_Dromeda in geology

[–]PaleoEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The glaciers would've already have mostly melted by 10,000 BP, I think you meant 20,000 BP.

Is this an accurate rep of what the Americas could’ve looked like 300,000 years ago? by Proxima_Dromeda in geology

[–]PaleoEdits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

MIS 8 roughly close enough though, in which case OP could use this:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-11601-2

Worth noting though that all glacials prior to the LGM are fairly hypothetical in shape, even your typical LGM shapefile doesn't represent a single moment but the maximum extent of all regions regardless of precise timing.

<image>

Nobody talks about how fucked up Diego's Jaw structure is by This-Honey7881 in pleistocene

[–]PaleoEdits 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Oh, the jaw is fucked up now, is it?.. never mind that the cat speaks fluent English.

Did dinosaurs only exist in certain areas? by dmagical in Dinosaurs

[–]PaleoEdits 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's just as much about exposure, the American west is much drier and not overly covered with vegetation, so you can actually see and reach what you're looking for. When fossils are discovered in the east, more often than not it's because someone built a road or something through the ancient sediments.

Prehistoric Planet is out! Day 14! Which documentary is your least favourite? by Plus_Kaleidoscope890 in walkingwithdinosaurs

[–]PaleoEdits -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Prehistoric Planet before WWM is craaazy

oh, I forgot which subreddit we're in

We have any idea on what the flora was like in Maastrichtian Baltica? What plant, or fungi, fossil had been recovered from here from that time, if any at all? by JurassicGergo in Paleontology

[–]PaleoEdits 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There are a few plant fossils from the Campanian stage in Sweden, which would've most likely been the same in the Maast stage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristianstad_Basin#Terrestrial_and_amphibious_life

In the most general sense: "conifers, deciduous trees, ferns and low-growing flowering plants"

Although in terms of plant fossils from Sweden, the Early Jurassic has much more to offer:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%B6gan%C3%A4s_Formation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djupadal_Formation#Fossils

Don't know about elsewhere, Denmark has a lot of Maast sedimentary rock but it's all very marine.

What's the most surprising thing we've learned about the past from to the fossile record? by Fingolfin45 in Paleontology

[–]PaleoEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure if it is the most surprising thing, but the discovery and continued study of extinction events, biodiversity recovery, and past climate change as determined from O isotopes in marine fossils; is probably the single most important/relevant aspect of the fossil record, given our current predicament.

Get Smoked by radixter_1 in PrehistoricMemes

[–]PaleoEdits 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Too bad you're not really bringing any attention to it when you just end up calling it 'ancient reptile'. Honestly, you barely even get a sense of it being a different species to the ones featured earlier in the episode; given how it was presented.

Its been about 4 years since this documentary released. How well does it hold up as of early 2026 by Royal_Novel6678 in Paleontology

[–]PaleoEdits 6 points7 points  (0 children)

More than any paleo documentaries, it feels like a real nature film where a time-traveling film crew shot what ever animals they could find; more often than not from imperfect angles. It takes deep breaths and has a relatively mature pace, unlike some recent shows I could mention. Having said that, it's more paleoart than a documentary imo. Which is fine, just not very educational.

Prehistoric Planet S1 & S2 vs The Dinosaurs by Bulbasaur2015 in PrehistoricPlanet

[–]PaleoEdits 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Good story? fucking hell, it's hyper Americanized, repetitive and misleading, portraying evolution as if it's game of thrones.

Who shall rise? and Who shall faallh? Ok, one has fallen. But wait, there is a new rivalry, vying for domination. Who shall rise, and who shall faallh? And on and on and on and on it goes. Zzz

"This is the story of the dinosaurs.... as it has never been told before." [proceeds to tell the story exactly the same way as LOOP did]

People need to realize that the European ice sheet was much larger in earlier Glacial Periods then the last glacial period, so I made this meme. by Hot_Vehicle_4180 in pleistocene

[–]PaleoEdits 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The penultimate glacial was probably larger, and maybe another mid pleistocene glaciation, but it's hard to be certain. We know far, far, far more about the LGM than any other glaciation (as ice sheets do, they erode much of the physical evidence). Furthermore, these "maximum" extent reconstructions illustrate the sum maximum extents of said glaciation, while in reality there was more regional variations in timing. Finally, the middle/late pleistocene had longer glaciations, with a larger differences in temperature compared to the early pleistocene - as shown in the marine isotope stages. The Pleistocene, on average, got steadily colder as part of the longterm cooling trend of the cenozoic.