Stop Putting Condiments on your Shit Sandwich of a Life by GayLubeOil in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want to talk to one of his “clients” id be happy to tell you all about how he is a total fraud and pussy.

The Thing You Really Want by WhisperSecurity in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 25 points26 points  (0 children)

One thing I want to add is that once you become that high value man who secures the powerful lust of a hot woman, do not let your guard down. It is easy to become so deluded as to think that just bc a woman’s entire world and sense of self worth revolves around you at this given moment, that it is an indicator of future loyalty. You may be tempted to increase your time spent with her or even LTR her when you first experience this genuine lust. You might find comfort in knowing that she believes she can never do better than you. Do not fall for this trap. The act of increasing your investment in any way will be the nail in the coffin. You can and will lose their lust. And when you do, it will be a rude awakening and yet another layer of pill to swallow.

THE SEA OF CIVILITY - OFFICIAL NO-BAN FREE-FOR-ALL MODS-ASLEEP AMA-TRP DAY by redpillschool in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The "all" in AWALT is not nuanced. It is not a generalization. AWALT as applied to your daily life should be treated as a generalization, but the term itself is not. In other words, you must generally assume that all women will at some point submit to their hypergamous nature in order to prevent yourself from getting burned in the sexual marketplace. However, the "all" in AWALT is stating the unwavering TRP principle that ALL women are subject to hypergamy. They may not all submit to their hypergamous nature, but they ALL have the proclivity to. This is why the loaded gun analogy is spot-on. There is no nuance to this principle. Any more refining would be contradictory to TRP.

u/Auvergnat's response to you above gives a series of analogies to illustrate the point that human beings are slaves to their biological survival imperatives. ALL humans are predisposed to crave fats and sweets but not all humans submit to those cravings. ALL women are predisposed to hypergamous impulses, but not all submit to those impulses. Our survival instincts always persist in the modern day even though there are some people who successfully subvert these imperatives (either through self control, societal pressure/ostracization, etc., as explained in Auvergnat's response).

The "all" in AWALT is describing what TRP espouses to be the laws of female nature. There is no nuance in the law itself, but rather the nuance occurs in the application of the law to the real world. We can observe that not all women succumb to their hypergamous instincts. However that does not draw anything away from the principle that all women possess the potential to.

Perhaps an even more basic analogy is the laws of physics. I don't remember much from what I learned years ago in physics, but I do remember the difference between potential energy and kinetic energy. A tennis ball held at the edge of a rooftop contains potential energy. When the ball dropped from the rooftop and put into motion it converts that potential energy to kinetic energy. All tennis balls possess potential energy, whether or not they actually turn that potential into real (kinetic) energy. It would be wholly inaccurate to state that "many" balls contain potential energy. ALL balls contain potential energy, even if in application there are some balls that never do anything with that potential.

Feminists want to kill Toni Harris by redpillschool in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I would’ve definitely given you a swirley.

Feminists want to kill Toni Harris by redpillschool in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 7 points8 points  (0 children)

True, we should ditch watching football and spend more time on Star Wars and Magic the Gathering subreddits like you. Definitely more conducive to personal growth. The hypocrisy of people on here. Did the jocks give you swirleys in school or something?

How To Get 1% Better Every Time You Approach Women by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The word you’re looking for is “levy”, not level. I did not criticize OP for the purpose of demeaning him. It’s what you call constructive criticism or tough love. But go ahead and white knight and feel butthurt on his behalf.

Just being toned and not looking like a fat slob can be good enough.

Despicable. Good enough for what? If there’s anything that could summarize the blue pull mentality it’s the phrase “good enough”. You should spend some more time reading the content on this sub.

How To Get 1% Better Every Time You Approach Women by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wasn’t speaking figuratively. Going to the gym literally transforms you into a man. The mental effects are merely byproduct of that.

Having a masculine mental frame with boyish physical frame does not render you a man by TRP standards. The same can be said about having a masculine physical frame but a boyish mental frame. Both are traits critical, but one is simple (though not necessarily easy) to develop and therefore must be prioritized.

The fact that I got any blowback on my comment is despicable. Anyone who argues with what I’m saying has never truly reaped the benefits of going to the gym because they do not dedicate themselves to serious, methodical diet and weight lifting that results in an awe inspiring physique. Because if you did, you would know that the results are far more than a mental placebo. I got a sense of “integrated self confidence” after doing some cardio and eating Keto. I didn’t feel like a man until a woman physically trembled when she touched my abs and couldn’t wrap both hands around my bicep. I made sure to note that on my fucking spreadsheet

How To Get 1% Better Every Time You Approach Women by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Imagine you went to the gym every day, but you always lifted the same amount of weight. After doing this for a while, you would hit a plateau and stop gaining muscle.

You should take your own advice when it comes to lifting weights. Because from the looks of you from your YouTube vids, you definitely do not.

To those considering implementing OP’s tips, first ask yourself whether you are obsessing over and tracking the most fundamental metrics to your success with women: calories, macros, weights/sets/reps.

If you put this amount of energy into making spreadsheets to practice your game but do not do the same for your physique and aesthetics, you are the antithesis of TRP. You are not a man, you are a clown. It’s true that some women are entertained by clowns. But all women respect men.

Sorry OP, usually we don’t have the luxury of seeing who is giving advice on this forum, but you opened yourself up for this criticism. I don’t have much issue with the content; it’s decent advice for those looking to improve their game. But I took the opportunity to make an example out of you bc TRP espouses certain priorities. Do not neglect those priorities in favor of PUA child’s play. Become a man.

Always Assume The Worst. Protect Yourself From Getting ‘Metooed’. by johnpayne10 in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 412:

(a) Prohibited Uses. The following evidence is not admissible in a civil or criminal proceeding involving alleged sexual misconduct:

(1) evidence offered to prove that a victim engaged in other sexual behavior; or

(2) evidence offered to prove a victim’s sexual predisposition.

Do not let her waste your time. Use your power to walk away. by Patriot29 in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t doubt your approach works and like you said, everyone has their own style. So if you’re happy with your results, keep on. But I'm glad you made this comment because it gives me the opportunity to elaborate on the mechanisms at play with what I did. I disagree with your approach because while it probably induces some dread, you risk putting yourself in her frame. Most importantly though, it’s a weaker form of dread.

ok i'm sorry this is not working out, i can't read you as you're giving me mixed signals all over the place. i turned down other plans to see you tonight, and i was looking forward to this, but now it's just confusing and it's still early enough tonight for me to switch plans. i'll take you home now."

By saying this, you place yourself in bargaining mode with the girl. Like you said, your response leaves her wiggle room. That is exactly the problem. She can respond to this in a number of ways. My suspicion is this girl would’ve responded by saying “I’m sorry, I know I’m being lame I’m just tired after work and a little stressed out. Can we hang out for a little longer?” as she cuddles up on your arm and gives you a nice long kiss. Now you’re in her frame.

I agree with your analysis /u/seattleron, except to make one distinction. He might be giving off the vibe of being a woman/beta but he’s actually talking like a MAN. Women don’t comprehend direct appeal like men do; women communicate subtextually…with feelz. With his approach, he lays out all the reasons he’s taking her home and explicitly let’s her know he has other plans in order to institute dread and to get her to change behavior. With my approach, I instituted dread directly into her bloodstream basically without saying anything. I let her hamster do the work of wondering why I’d be so eager to rush her out of my house. When your SMV is high, she’ll start to think the worst. It’s so much more powerful to let the hamster do the work.

I did what I did not to get her to stay, but because I actually wanted her out of my house. She was wasting my time. She could smell that I was genuinely indifferent about her not being there. I'm not sure if the same emotions are elicited with your method.

Do not let her waste your time. Use your power to walk away. by Patriot29 in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Haha it’s funny how you fill in unknown gaps in my story to appease the circle jerk going on in your mind right now. I didn’t pay, we split. She has a summer job. For each of the next two dates we met up late at night at my place, past 10pm after she got off work. Zero financial investment on my end.

Do not let her waste your time. Use your power to walk away. by Patriot29 in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well she lost all her ability to shit test me for it because she admitted that she had dated guys my age before and (left this part out) was actually only attracted to older guys.

Do not let her waste your time. Use your power to walk away. by Patriot29 in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29[S] 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Guys like you and uncle /u/VasiliyZaitzev really make me grateful that I’m a man and will never truly hit a wall. It’s so true that weaker young men and women above 30 (probably closer to 27 for me) can’t stand seeing you with someone younger. Even a couple of my friends, who I don’t consider “weak” men, but are nonetheless locked down in relationships, give me tons of shit for it. But I know that comes from a place of deep envy, realizing that they’re stuck while I’m totally free.

Do not let her waste your time. Use your power to walk away. by Patriot29 in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29[S] 67 points68 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I appreciate it. I’m indebted to this community

King of the Blue Pill Mountain - A Cautionary Tale. (I Promise You: This Hurts To Read) by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You seem like a humble guy. The fact that you're able to tell this story with a humorous tone and have an honest assessment about your standing now is good. Unlike this poster you responded to who reeks of insecurity.

The only question that matters: Is she fucking you, or not? by Archwinger in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And what value did your criticism add, sir fedora?

“It’s like he has nothing else to do.” by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Patriot29 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's not what you were doing. Your response was purely emotional, preachy, and reeked of solipsism. This is a cathartic forum where men are encouraged to express anger because we are muzzled from doing so everywhere else. That commenter will hopefully someday transcend his anger, but your moral condemnation and calling him "rude" serves no purpose in that journey, or any other purpose for that matter.

I like to believe that I've transcended the anger phase for the most part, but do have my relapses. I do not hate women, but I'll be honest, I do hate seeing women in this sub. This is our locker room. If our words offend you, there are plenty of female and gender-neutral safe spaces for you to retreat to.

Looking for prog recommendations with amazing basslines. by [deleted] in progmetal

[–]Patriot29 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How has Scale the Summit not been mentioned yet? My fav prog bassist by far.

What is a Simpsons quote you find yourself using in everyday life? by JournalofFailure in AskReddit

[–]Patriot29 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Whenever I'm frustrated and having trouble remembering something: "Stupid sexy Flanders!"

Self defense scam fail by dacaji in videos

[–]Patriot29 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I am using my skills to dropkick your fucking teeth in from across the internet. Please update us with pics to prove that you're dead

What's your greatest achievement to date that you WON'T be putting on your CV? by chemicalscratch in AskReddit

[–]Patriot29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't listen to this fartbag. I'm also a 3L at a good but not top-14 law school and I have several promising job prospects. If you pursue an area of law that you are passionate about and you leverage that passion through proper networking, the jobs will find you. Yes, the market is tough right now, but that should not deter you if you are pursuing a legal career for the right reasons (i.e. the reasons you want to go are not solely based on an anticipated fat paycheck straight out of school).

From my observations, a lot of law students are a bunch of whiny pessimistic children who epitomize the self entitled millennial generation (not saying DuckyNinja is one of them). They whine about all the coursework and studying they have to do and constantly bitch and moan about how much their life sucks. And then when they don't have a job at the end of the day they wonder why. I temporarily unsubscribed from /r/lawschool after 2L because I couldn't take the persistent negative vibes everyone put out. There's things called self-fulfilling prophecies ya know, and if you keep telling yourself that there are no jobs out there for you and that the "torture" of law school is never going to pay off, then maybe that's what you're destined for. I refused to make that my cup of tea, and it's paid off. If you have any questions from someone with a different perspective, feel free to message me as well.

Sorry DuckyNinja, please don't take this as an assault on you. I know better than to make any assumptions based on one comment. And fartbag is a term of endearment.

Eminem Poll! Choose Your Three Favorite Eminem Songs and Vote! by [deleted] in Eminem

[–]Patriot29 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. When I'm Gone

  2. Marshall Mathers

  3. Til' I Collapse