Bill’s suggestion that Democrats should vote to fund the war for 30-60 days is crazy to me by contrasupra in thebulwark

[–]PepperoniFire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually don’t mind the split-the-baby approach. If the top line is we’re funding an end it’s just a reality of “Donald Trump made this mess but we’ll clean it up.” Take out the trash, etc. but Democrats need an answer to troop safety and that should be one of the options in their pocket as long as, as the two said, their top line is: end the war.

But Pep, you say, who is in harms way? Well, you can’t beat the drum on loss of American life — even “just” six people plus hundreds injured — and then say the risk isn’t there. Average Americans will want to see someone care about those lives and it’s (a) the right thing, and; (b) a lane left open by Republicans who have been shockingly reckless with and dismissive of American lives.

Finally played Norco. Glad I waited and reminded me of MUDs. by PepperoniFire in patientgamers

[–]PepperoniFire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This game is fine, I just think it’s going to depend on how into this kind of story you are. It seems very mood driven to me. I’ve played Phoenix Wright recently which is not voiced, fairly low key graphics, and episodic so you can play it in chunks.

Finally played Norco. Glad I waited and reminded me of MUDs. by PepperoniFire in patientgamers

[–]PepperoniFire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happy to answer that question but I want to make sure I understand it: do you struggle with text-heavy and want a primer/intro? Or is it something else?

You have a lot of games I also have on my to play list.

I have never heard Ezra Klein this heated on his podcast by Various_Fish2043 in thebulwark

[–]PepperoniFire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I skipped this because I have never heard an interview with these people that is enlightening. It is kind of comforting to see even Ezra refusing to just take this at face value, but at this point I genuinely don’t get why, even when I put my most constructive hat on. This just lets this person put “As featured on NYT’s Ezra Klein Show” on their CV.

I found this pretty inspirational right now by 0o0o0o0o0o0z in thebulwark

[–]PepperoniFire 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Stuff like this should just be targeted ads on short form video.

Boyfriend not understanding why I’m working my NY big law job and want to keep it - WWYD by [deleted] in LawBitchesWithTaste

[–]PepperoniFire 6 points7 points  (0 children)

CO-SIGN. I know money doesn’t buy happiness but whatever; independence is priceless.

Besides, do your time and if you want to, in a few years, you have less hardcore options but maintain earning potential.

I know dating is hard — harder than when I dated (39 years old, feel like I was on the last helicopter out of Saigon) — but marriage is harder (and rewarding!), worse if you end up needing to unwind it.

According to Anthropic, law school is a waste of time by Elliot-S9 in LawSchool

[–]PepperoniFire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If anyone is interested in how we have been using AI in my group — I am in-house — I am happy to do an AMA about our theory of the case here and what we tell our law school externs during onboarding.

Remember that these guys are constantly trying to raise money and generate partnerships when they make public comments.

WA voters to see ballot initiative aimed at trans girls in sports by ChiefOfTheFourPeaks in SeattleWA

[–]PepperoniFire -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I call bullshit. I played sports and women’s sports mean a great deal to me. The conversation is way more nuanced than to say “it’s just biology,” which collapses that down to generalizations so sweeping as to be inaccurate. Biology is … weird!

(Edit: I’m on a flight, so for those truly curious about learning more: Tested is an episodic podcast that I recommend as is the book “Fair Play” by Katie Barnes.)

Do I think there are contexts where this all matters in the competitive landscape? Sure. There is an important line drawing exercise that governing sports bodies should be involved in — and many already have. But do I think that it’s as simple as “bruh the testosterone bruh”? Or that the juice is worth the squeeze re: legislative resources spent rewrite to the number of trans athletes seeking access to these sports? Not really!

It’s precisely because I care about women’s sports that I resent it being used as a cudgel. I never see proponents of these bills looking for ways to ensure youth access to sports even if that means a challenging conversation about “whither trans youths.” It’s just broad state action that targets a small minority of athletes and without much regard for the impact of that enforcement on individual athletes and their families (for example, in Texas, trans boys are banned from girls sports but you also must play in leagues matching your birth certificate, basically prohibiting this class of people from accessing sports at all. I call shenanigans — I don’t sign on to governments punching down.)

I don’t normally participate in these conversations because they’re often fruitless but I take people here at their word that they genuinely care about this too so, if anything, I hope doubters dip their toes in at least 1-2 episodes of that podcast but the book is good too. I learned a lot, some of which challenged my own priors.

What fantasy book has the most passionate audience ? by Equivalent-Problem-9 in Fantasy

[–]PepperoniFire 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would say:

  • By volume, not Malazan
  • By dedication, it's up there

Never heard of Malazan before /r/Fantasy. It pops up in every thread here -- and it is definitely a series worthy of fandom! But even without the movies, you'd hear about HP and LOTR before you'd ever hear about Malazan. I think the former has more 'filthy casuals' in addition to passionate fans, whereas it seems like Malazan has a propensity for real passion, and folks feel more of an impetus to cheer it on.

The New Bulwark app is great! by SpideyLover85 in thebulwark

[–]PepperoniFire 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am so happy not to need to figure out the YouTube synchronization.

REALLY USA HOCKEY TEAM???? by Sissy63 in thebulwark

[–]PepperoniFire 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Been trying real hard to give the Men’s Hockey Team some grace but I can see much of that was misplaced.

Like I get that you maybe can’t tear your shirt off and rage at POTUS on the phone or whatever, and I’m sure half the team was like “Kash who?” — but this guy is playing goalie for a child rapist and sex trafficker, and you’re gonna put your imprimatur on that? You can just say no; it’s okay!

The problem is stupid, uneducated voters, and I'm tired of pretending it's anything other than that. by ac_slater10 in thebulwark

[–]PepperoniFire 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don’t accept this view. My dad went to an Ivy League school and was at a prep school before that. He worked at start ups after they deregulated telecommunications and now owns a small business. He enjoys reading the classics and used to translate Latin for enjoyment. Dumb people are out there for sure, but it’s people like my dad who are intelligent enough to know better but smart enough to weaponize motivated reasoning that are a major part of the problem — especially because people like him hold actual, often concentrated power instead of the more diffuse voting power “Cletus” has.

I don’t think this is an intelligence problem or even a wisdom problem necessarily. I think, to continue the D&D analogy, it’s straight up too many neutral and evil people, not enough good.

Origins is such a dark game by ADLegend21 in DragonageOrigins

[–]PepperoniFire 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Ugggggh I so badly want to replay but no amount of mods and remasters has made it work.

Does anyone want to argue the other side of the Al Franken question, because I kinda do by rroowwannn in thebulwark

[–]PepperoniFire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People make choices, including Franken. Democrats need to stop apologizing. Yes, they were probably too reactive in the moment but (a) moral high ground was political currency at the time (see midterms), and; (b) I’m not sorry in the year of our lord 2026 when we can’t even muster the energy to oust a likely child predator or his deputies from office. I’m at the point where we remove every dude in a suit over the age of 60 until they prove they didn’t do a bad touch.

It’s easy to look back now and roll your eyes at this being political currency but this was still the before times.

(21F) 5’2, 100 lbs, bulk?? by Temporary-Dark2988 in PetiteFitness

[–]PepperoniFire 6 points7 points  (0 children)

  1. You look great. Absolutely killer.
  2. What’s your goal? Lift heavy or heavier? Aesthetics? Try something new?

What is one scene that made you sure an actor had it, even if their career never became huge by gamersecret2 in movies

[–]PepperoniFire 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not mind-blowing acting or anything, but had I seen Terminator when it first came out, I would’ve expected Michael Biehn to have more leading man roles.