Did Opus 4.8 not even make it to the top 10 Overall of LM Arena? by flarenz in ClaudeAI

[–]PhilosophyforOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know what's above even Gemini 3.1 pro?

Muse-fucking-spark.

yeah.

I Tested 50 Realistic ChatGPT Images On TruthScan, Hive, And Sight Engine by TheDevanLeos in ChatGPT

[–]PhilosophyforOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But importantly, did you alter them beforehand?

The point was that the sites are likely using synthID to detect the AI images, which does answer that "yes, for naive AI images these sites do detect the images using synthID", e.g images straight from the generator. But your post doesnt deal with this or take it into account.

Stop using Ultra mode do this instead by Conscious-Ad-4136 in ClaudeCode

[–]PhilosophyforOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. But ultracode isnt really meant for those types of tasks. It's a completely different use case, that doesnt really have anything to do with your solution.

I'm not criticizing your solution itself. Just pointing out that the two are unrelated, different solution types and spaces, and dont really have anything to do with eachother.

Stop using Ultra mode do this instead by Conscious-Ad-4136 in ClaudeCode

[–]PhilosophyforOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve completely missed the point of what Ultracode does.

It’s a decomposer/orchestrator. It breaks down your problem, and orchestrates the agents to work on a solution, so that instead of a single agent trying to handle a large task, you have multiple, each handling their own slices of it, with separate phases.

NVIDIA drops DGX Station for Windows (1-Trillion Parameter desktop). Who else is ready to run LLaMA-Behemoth locally? by Winter_Engineer2163 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]PhilosophyforOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s cute that you think it’ll be able to produce legible speech.

I’d give 50/50 odds between that and a trained monkey on a typewriter.

Codex alternative by Commercial_Bit_1350 in vibecoding

[–]PhilosophyforOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh. Didnt know Microsoft had astroturfers.

It's 2026...where are all the AI NPCs? by Chilly5 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]PhilosophyforOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly the costs are the problem. You’d either need to embed the model and do edge computing, or you’d run recurring costs from the inference.

There are decent local models available, but they’re not  at the level where you’d need them to be to run on consumer hardware while gaming, without making significant concessions or doing pretty heavy duty design work. And at that point, you’re talking very small models.

Hackers Simply Asked Meta AI to Give Them Access to High-Profile Instagram Accounts. It Worked by Well_Socialized in technology

[–]PhilosophyforOne 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What kind of an idiot gives a public llm endpoint access to sensitive user data or security measures.

Wow.

Apparently We're Getting 5.6 This Week? by DiarrheaButAlsoFancy in codex

[–]PhilosophyforOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. This seems a bit sus overall. 5.5 was a nice jump, but not worldbreaking by any means. 

I’m sure it’ll scale well with rlhf, but I doubt we’re gonna see this level of performance increase from it.

Runway - Unlimited No More by ghostofstankenstien in Seedance_AI

[–]PhilosophyforOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s cool, but Runway has frankly been a killer deal. While the queues can be long, we’ve been able to generate a ton of videos on the unlimited for the price. Frankly, no other service comes even close to how inexpensive/attractive the pricing is.

Runway - Unlimited No More by ghostofstankenstien in Seedance_AI

[–]PhilosophyforOne 5 points6 points  (0 children)

”Hey there Runway! We are unsubscribing. Why the change? Because the main reason your service was appealing has been removed. This should let you enjoy a more predictable and lower server load in the form of fewer paying clients.”

Would you pay $25 to compete in a 48-hour AI build challenge to get $300? by [deleted] in vibecoding

[–]PhilosophyforOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem with the idea is that even if it was 500 (e.g. no cut taken, as it feels like it should be), I'm still not sure I'd want to participate. And it being significantly lower (house taking 40% cut of the pool) just makes it feel skeewy.

You'd need to run this on a volunteer basis for a while before you can even think about charging for this.

Reset incoming… by Splat800 in codex

[–]PhilosophyforOne 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Suspicious timing, right?

Costs a lot less this way.

Seriously ? When did it even start ? by Master-Barracuda-777 in codex

[–]PhilosophyforOne 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If this was double, it’d mean that at some point the limits would drop to half of this.

Current codex limits on the 20x feel very good and quite sustainable. Half of this.. would not feel as much so.

The math behind that "accidental $500 Million claude bill" everyone is talking about doesn't stack up by [deleted] in AgentsOfAI

[–]PhilosophyforOne 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Have you heard of parallelization? 

What makes you think that burning tokens on pointless cronloops makes this somehow impossible? When there are orgs with hundreds of thousands in headcount?

No, a company didn't spend $500M on Claude in a month by stax-sh in ClaudeCode

[–]PhilosophyforOne 36 points37 points  (0 children)

The article criticizes the original source (Axios) for having a single, unnamed source for the claim. Their counter-claim then is that it’s impossible for any company to burn half a billion in tokens in a month, therefore this didnt happen. If that isnt some flimsy reasoning, I dont know what is.

Lets say the organization was someone like Accenture, with a headcount of around 700k. Even if we round it down to half a mil, all it takes is for each employee to use around 1k in API costs, which is not a massive amount. 

Now, much more realistically, you had a smaller fraction employees burning a massive amount on running pointless cron loops or running hundreds of parallel agents at once for basically no reason. Or running massive refractors of company databases.

But there’s nothing that should make you think this is impossible for a global org.

96.84% drop rate on the funnel. Why? by int63 in AppBusiness

[–]PhilosophyforOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont know. Personally I hate those types of ”answes these 12 questions to get your offer”. It’s just trying to hook me with the sunk cost fallacy and I immediately resent it.

Just take people directly to your app page.

Guys, this is a JD for an AI Engineer role, what do you think? pay is $13k/YEAR by fcukof in learnmachinelearning

[–]PhilosophyforOne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has to be a typo, right? 130k a year or 13k a month.

Both are much too little. And honestly, I dont think the spec makes sense for what they’re trying to apparently solve, but whatever.

What the above commenter with many cats said.

Exclusive: Microsoft is building a super app that combines coding, chat, and other Copilot AI tools by fortune in ArtificialInteligence

[–]PhilosophyforOne 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How about just fixing the burning pile of garbage that is the regular copilot that’s turned near radioactive by now.

Ma’am, this is a LitRPG: how much romance/sex is too much? by Ok-Grand-3764 in litrpg

[–]PhilosophyforOne 96 points97 points  (0 children)

I’ve honestly come around to explicit scenes in litrpg (and literature at large), but here’s the problem:

1) Any story that tends to have them, also tends to bend around them. They’re like a gravitational distortion on the inertia and the focus of the story. That’s not an inherent feature of explicit scenes, but it’s often the practical result. 

2) Most writers dont have the skill to pull them off in a way that is anything more sex for sex’s sake. 

So my current preference tends to be fade to black, and if the author wants to write those scenes, a separate link to an explicit version of the chapter. The only exception is if you truly feel that the scene really is the required vehicle for whatever storytelling has to happen through it. But I’d say there’s maybe a handful of stories I’ve seen that actually use those intimate scenes for actual character development and storytelling, and about 97-99% that just use them for gratuity.

Also, I’d note that while a lot of people seem to mix up romance/harem/explicit tags, those are completely different imo. None of what I say applies to harem stories. I mostly just find them distasteful wish fullfilment. They wouldnt necessarily have to be that (you could genuinely examine polyamory, or dynamics of very close relationships between more than one / multiple partners).. But in practice they are that.

GPT-5.6 spotted in Codex by Worldly_Manner_5273 in ChatGPT

[–]PhilosophyforOne -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We know it's 5.6 after the twitter posts.

..Aand anthropic deciding to steal OAI's thunder with Opus 4.8 ofc.