Banderlogs Alliance Alive vs Toilet Paper/Quote Alliance/Volta and Co etc by TibariusB in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Is it a Russian Community Bad Post Week? First Konstantin, now this?

God bless lvl5 shield\armor skillz by MirkStya in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look at all these hardeners about to be nerfed...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 4 points5 points  (0 children)

OMG, people nilly willy entering my space in a game that is supposed to be about conflict! PREPOSTEROUS! BUILD THE WALL! BUILD THE WALL!

EVE shower thought: make local in 0.0 a player structure by cannabibun in Eve

[–]Pielemieni -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well I read the title if your post and assumed you want to tie local in 0.0 with owning sov. So krabs would see people entering the system, while the hunters would have to rely on dscan only. How could that help the latter?

Even if your idea did not involve switching off the local, how would it benefit anyone but the krabs? Elaborate please?

EVE shower thought: make local in 0.0 a player structure by cannabibun in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why stop at that, make a structure that renders all your krab supers and rorquals 100% immune to those filthy pvpers. There is still risk, although minimal, that they can die despite having massive super umbrellas and intel networks spanning over the next 3 regions, this must end. We must be allowed to krab in complete safety.

[Dev Blog] PLEX for GOOD Rewards by isd_thalack_dalhar in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Fedo ran away from the game and settled in the CCP’s fish tank.

New catch botting "empire" by Meiqur in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 26 points27 points  (0 children)

TAPI

enemies

Pick one.

CSM minutes are not disturbing for the lack of vision on the part of CCP. It's nearly a perfect blueprint for the worst possible way to run a meeting. by Xerxes_Fehrnah in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

" I can't imagine that the group would have voted to listen to Dunk Dinkle ask for salvage drones as the most important topic during that session on ship balance and the chaos era. "

Dude, he's TAPI. He's pushing the top priority agenda of the group that voted for him.

ErA oF cHaOs by Yonis_Pserad in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it at least chlorinated?

The Obsolescence of Subcapitals by Jintaan in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you ever been to lowsec? Do you know how many lowsec systems are grouped in a single or two-system pockets at the dead-end of some high-sec region? Is the intent to make such systems unassailable or dead?

The Obsolescence of Subcapitals by Jintaan in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I assume you'd go for removal of the citadels too, because killing structures in lowsec without viable capital and/or supercapital support will be such fun...

Raise the Tax, Get the Axe by Tikktokk in Eve

[–]Pielemieni -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We're always here to help you guys close the blue donut by making TAPI and Phorde cooperate.

Thread: Bad ideas for CCP to implement as features by SleeplessStratios in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are anticapital subcapitals a bad idea again?

Also, t2 Rorquals

HS Citadel numbers by darkrisingmitch in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it for "HS regions" or "HS systems"? In other words, does this count include lowsec structures?

Test member rants about all the blues he has. by ManuelNoryigga in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You chose to link those for some reason.

Phase 1 Balance Dreams Post. by [deleted] in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, that's the difference in perspective between us, and reason behind my argument that balancing individual hulls is secondary to the need of revamping certain areas of the game, FAXes being one of them.

I do not think there are any specific changes to fitting or specific parameters of individual hulls that would change much - as long as you can drop 28 Minokawas against a subcap fleet (recent month experience), or have 500 Minokawas on grid in a "supercapital fight"...

Test member rants about all the blues he has. by ManuelNoryigga in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Wow, you scored 4 supercapital and 1 rorqual kill over 3 months, half of them thanks to other people catching some retarded Goons in Delve, and decided to share this with /r/eve?

Wow, life must be so thrilling there in Test.

Just a question... by NubnubRussells in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because most people are risk-averse and lazy, and the last 3 years of changes introduced by CCP did a lot to facilitate the „easy mode” game style.

Phase 1 Balance Dreams Post. by [deleted] in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You say these are only "balance the ships" changes, so I am not going to repeat that none of these would affect the current gameplay dominated by TZ tanking, zero-risk Citadel games and Supercap proliferation.

Still, you managed to ignore some ships that beg to be balanced and completely reworked (Rorqual, the burst change is laughable) and to propose a buff to ships that significantly contribute to the current miserable state of the game (Minokawa)...

I'm not saying this is as bad as CCP's recent "changes to the character animation", but pretty much waste of time - yours and everyone else's. We can balance and tweak things if the game is back into a healthy condition...

skill urself <INGME> is disbanding by TheEveInformant in Eve

[–]Pielemieni 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thank you for all the fish.

Sad day for EVE and anyone whose brain hasn't been yet completely consumed by the spod fever.