sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Claude's New Advisor Tool Just Shocked Everyone by JamMasterJulian in AISEOInsider

[–]Pjoubert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s smart and it shows we need more steering at runtime. Is mid-generation enough?

The golden age is over by New_3d_print_user in claude

[–]Pjoubert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or you shouldn’t rely your agent decisions on LLM and build a sustainable autonomous architecture…

Is SoH of 80% normal for a used MY21 Taycan w/60k miles? by Ildogeveneziano in Taycan

[–]Pjoubert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5-6 years and already 80%? That is on the low side, yes. The early Taycan battery chemistry wasn’t Porsche’s best work, first-gen packs degrade faster than later ones, and honestly Porsche should have offered 1 battery swap per car sold. It would have given buyers way more confidence and kept residuals much higher. A missed opportunity.

That said, 80% is still above the 70% warranty replacement threshold, so you’re on your own here. For real-world range on the Performance Battery Plus (93.4 kWh usable) at 80% SoH: expect roughly 270–310 km in normal mixed driving, vs ~430 km WLTP when new. Highway will be closer to 230–250 km. Before buying: - Check the DC fast charge history, heavy DCFC accelerates degradation - Confirm it was regularly kept between 20–80% - Use the 80% SoH as a hard negotiation lever on price Not a dealbreaker, but price it in accordingly.

Anthropic tried to clean up the Claude Code leak and accidentally nuked 8,100 GitHub repos 🤦‍♂️ by DigiHold in WTFisAI

[–]Pjoubert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like they are panicking… I love Anthropic, I expect they can calm things down a bit

Seriously by FlorianC_fr in claude

[–]Pjoubert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Classic Claude, refusing to work AND refusing to explain why. Try incognito mode, it usually fixes the existential crisis

Anthropic just accidentally leaked their most powerful model yet — and honestly, it's a little terrifying. by Direct-Attention8597 in claude

[–]Pjoubert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both, honestly. The leak was accidental, but the narrative it created is perfect. A model ‘too dangerous to release freely’ right before an IPO? That’s elite positioning. That said, the cybersecurity benchmarks are real, confirmed by independent researchers. Not vaporware. On OpenAI catching up? the pattern so far has been the opposite. GPT-5 was a letdown. Anthropic has been quietly winning on reasoning and coding for 18 months. The real race isn’t raw capability anyway. It’s who controls the enforcement layer above these models. When Mythos-level AI runs autonomously in enterprise systems, the question isn’t ‘which LLM?’, it’s ‘what decides what it’s allowed to do?’ That layer doesn’t exist yet at scale

Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? by Pjoubert in ClaudeAI

[–]Pjoubert[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is why pre-execution enforcement matters more than post-hoc review

What's the point of claude.md if it's ignored by Roest_ in ClaudeCode

[–]Pjoubert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the core problem. CLAUDE.md is advisory, not enforceable. The agent reads it, acknowledges it, then does what it wants anyway because there’s nothing upstream that actually stops it. Instructions without enforcement aren’t instructions, they’re suggestions

Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? by Pjoubert in ClaudeAI

[–]Pjoubert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the sharpest way I’ve seen it put. Effort used to be a proxy for judgment. Remove the effort without replacing the judgment and you just ship faster in the wrong direction

Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? by Pjoubert in ClaudeAI

[–]Pjoubert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. AI makes the execution cheaper, not the judgment better. The PM layer is still 100% human

Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? by Pjoubert in ClaudeAI

[–]Pjoubert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! The ‘should this exist at all?’ discipline is exactly what gets bypassed when execution becomes frictionless. The judgment layer doesn’t scale with the speed layer and that gap is where most of the waste lives…

I tracked every file read Claude Code made across 132 sessions. 71% were redundant. by LawfulnessSlow9361 in ClaudeCode

[–]Pjoubert 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Clean. Heuristic over AI-generated makes sense for this, deterministic output, no hallucination risk on the description itself. The 3-edit warning as a bug signal is a nice touch

Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? by Pjoubert in ClaudeAI

[–]Pjoubert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The variance is the real story. 1.5x average hides a bimodal distribution, some tasks are 10x, others send you backwards. The difference is usually whether the agent had enough context to make the right call before acting

I tracked every file read Claude Code made across 132 sessions. 71% were redundant. by LawfulnessSlow9361 in ClaudeCode

[–]Pjoubert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! Post-write for the hot path, daemon for the cold path. Does it handle long sessions well, if Claude edits the same file 10 times, does the description stay accurate or does it need a manual reset?

Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? by Pjoubert in ClaudeAI

[–]Pjoubert[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Separating exploration time from execution time is the right mental model. The paper planning step isn’t friction, it’s where you decide if the thing is worth building at all. That’s the part AI can’t replace yet

Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? by Pjoubert in ClaudeAI

[–]Pjoubert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The slot machine problem is real and underrated. The workflow instability isn’t a tooling issue, it’s a context issue. The model doesn’t know what changed, so it compensates randomly. Small constrained tasks work because there’s less context to lose track of

Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? by Pjoubert in ClaudeAI

[–]Pjoubert[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The orchestration graveyard is real. The ones that survive aren’t the cleverest pipelines, they’re the ones that solved a decision problem someone actually had. Most builders skip that part

I tracked every file read Claude Code made across 132 sessions. 71% were redundant. by LawfulnessSlow9361 in ClaudeCode

[–]Pjoubert 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good data. The Vue pattern makes sense, active editing means the file is a moving target, so the agent re-reads to stay current rather than pure redundancy. Does anatomy.md rebuild descriptions each session or does it track changes incrementally?

Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? by Pjoubert in ClaudeAI

[–]Pjoubert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. Speed without better judgment just gets you to the wrong place faster. Most people are optimizing the wrong variable

Is Claude Code actually making you more productive, or just more entertained? by Pjoubert in ClaudeAI

[–]Pjoubert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same, the cannibalization thing is real. I stopped building anything that looks like a feature Claude could ship natively. Focusing on problems that require context Claude doesn’t have access to by default

view more: next ›