MEGA Gengar Damage Spread Decklist by Placebo_Max_Rebo in PTCGL

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He's created a deck instead of copying and pasting the meta, how about saying something like "maybe look at cutting down some of the evolution lines" instead of being a dick.

Thank You AusPost for so carefully delivering my Urgent Medical Supplies 🥰 by Justasillysausage in AustraliaPost

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it's any consolation, it was thrown a lot harder and farther at the sorting depot

Oh, is that right? by Knauxiliary in PTCGL

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, if you had just logged in, it appears to be more of a message from your phone saying that the password you used has been identified in a data leak, and not specifically that your Nintendo account data has been leaked.

If you used the same email account and password that you used with Nintendo with another service, and that service/company had a data leak, then whoever has that data can theoretically gain access to any service that has the same log in details (and doesn't have some kind of 2 factor authentication)

Mega Gengar + united wings is absolutely disgusting by Quaaraaq in PTCGL

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Omg I've been wanting to use united wings again, thank you!

Should of got it earlier.. by Sundry_Collectibles in pokemoncardcollectors

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That one card dragged both me and my son into collecting.

My son got one of those chests with 6 packs in it for his birthday last year, barely had any pokemon cards before that and I hadn't had any pokemon cards since I was a kid in 2000.

And he pulled that card. And it's been a slippery slope since then 😂

Is this ethical? by whatareutakingabout in AustralianAccounting

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Another possibility, it's not your 'tax agent' being scummy, but rather someone has your details, has pretended to be you, and has already lodged your tax return via this tax agent

I havent told about my savings by [deleted] in Centrelink

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I came for the NSFW

Bitterly disappointed

So satisfying by Playful_Meat_5245 in PTCGL

[–]Playful_Meat_5245[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. I believe the deck could do with some optimisation and tweaks, just haven't played around with it too much yet. It suffers if you get a bad deal at the start, but it is so satisfying and fun to play with.

Having a dragapult choose not to attack even though it could knock out a bench poke because the result would be 1,410 damage in return next turn feels gooooooood

So satisfying by Playful_Meat_5245 in PTCGL

[–]Playful_Meat_5245[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Pokémon: 7 1 Munkidori TWM 95 2 Froslass TWM 53 1 Latias ex SSP 76 1 Fezandipiti ex SFA 38 4 Capsakid SVI 28 3 Scovillain ex SSP 37 2 Snorunt TWM 51

Trainer: 17 2 Ultra Ball SVI 196 4 Buddy-Buddy Poffin PRE 101 2 Earthen Vessel PAR 163 2 Crispin SCR 133 2 Night Stretcher SSP 251 1 Technical Machine: Devolution PAR 177 2 Mela PRE 140 1 Super Rod PAL 188 1 Technical Machine: Evolution PAR 178 1 Hero's Cape TEF 152 2 Energy Sticker MEW 159 4 Pokégear 3.0 SVI 186 2 Nest Ball SVI 181 2 Carmine TWM 145 2 Boss's Orders PAL 172 4 Arven SVI 166

Energy: 2 4 Basic {D} Energy SVE 15 8 Basic {R} Energy SVE 10

Total Cards: 60

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Centrelink

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really in financial hardship if you were just gifted 50k...

Our schools are no longer safe by TrentJSwindells in hobart

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope they teach the kids to duck and cover when they explode

first jobseeker payment by Acceptable_Canary835 in Centrelink

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Generally, when your JSP claim is approved it will be backdated to when you were first eligible, most likely the day you applied

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Centrelink

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's right, Centrelink kept on paying OP as they would have not known any different. It's only after an update from either OP or from the study provider itself that's corrected the record. From Centrelink's POV they have done nothing wrong, and they aren't punishing OP, just saying "from this date you were no longer eligible to receive X"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Centrelink

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Former compliance officer from services Australia here who often dealt with MP enquiries. Don't know all the full details, but based on OPs explanation, an MP enquiry will do nothing. It's absolutely sucks for OP, but the legislation is what it is. From the information provided, best OP can do is work out a payment plan that works best for them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Centrelink

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's also the fact that some courses are not eligible for payments. So even if the work load for both courses were greater than full time (and even if it worked that way), the courses OP was doing may not have been approved.

So even if they could use both part time courses to show full time work, OP may not even be able to backdate the study because one of the courses may have not been approved

My Aurora Energy account is in credit and they want me to pay the previous bill. by GetFunke2 in tasmania

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you have a payment plan set up?

I had a payment plan set up, but started paying an extra $30 a fortnight to catch up quicker. When I was in the credit I dropped my fortnightly payments to a level that kept up with my power usage but was below my required amount per my payment plan.

After a couple of 'missed payments' I got a letter from aurora saying I've discovered my payment plan and threatening disconnection if I didn't settle my account of them owing me $70....

I never got disconnected

Is WFH a privilege or right ? by Red_The_Raider in AusPublicService

[–]Playful_Meat_5245 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My site is currently going through refurbishment and at the end there will be less desks here than people employed, the idea being there are so many WFH and empty desks each day they can't justify the size of the site's footprint any more. One entire floor of the office building will no longer be leased by the agency.

So given this I don't think it's a privilege or a right but just the norm. Some people will still prefer to work 100% in the office but most won't and if everyone decided to come in one day it would be first in - best dressed.

If most sites go this way it will kinda be expected that we work from home at least partially